Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18769624 | MIGRATION OF NETWORK TRAFFIC BETWEEN LICENSED AND UNLICENSED SPECTRUM | July 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18123634 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PDCCH SKIPPING AND SCHEDULING REQUEST | March 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17928912 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING SENSING IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17934520 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MULTI-STAGE DCI FOR UPLINK PRECODING | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17941209 | CODEBOOK FEEDBACK METHOD, NETWORK DEVICE, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17901413 | Communication Method and Device | September 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17897125 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, CONTROL DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17797354 | Dimensioning Granular Multi-Timescale Fairness | August 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17875994 | METHOD AND SYSTEM TO PREDICT THE INGRESS INTERFACE OF INTERNET TRAFFIC | July 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17792143 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17756751 | TECHNIQUE FOR PERFORMING MULTILINK COMMUNICATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | June 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17824783 | ACCESS POINT CHANNEL SELECTION | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17742454 | CYCLE-BASED PER-FLOW PACKET DROP COUNTING | May 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17732668 | PACKET SENDING METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM | April 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17772072 | WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM, ACCESS POINT DEVICE, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD | April 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17727195 | TECHNIQUES FOR SENDING A COLLISION INDICATION VIA A PHYSICAL SIDELINK FEEDBACK CHANNEL | April 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17765247 | TERMINAL AND COMMUNICATION METHOD | March 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17765263 | Timing Advance for TSN | March 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17762810 | METHOD FOR REPORTING CHANNEL FAILURE | March 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17762675 | LINK ADAPTATION CONTROL FIELD TRANSMISSION FOR LOW LATENCY | March 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17760604 | COMMUNICATION METHODS AND APPARATUSES | March 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17654715 | PHASE TRACKING REFERENCE SIGNAL (PTRS) FOR RANDOM ACCESS | March 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17694274 | MULTI-ELEMENT ROUTING SYSTEM FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS | March 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17637354 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING AUDIO QUALITY USING FEEDBACK CONTROL | February 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17635328 | METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIDELINK SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | February 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17648867 | APPLYING UNIFIED TRANSMISSION CONFIGURATION INDICATION STATES TO SIGNALS OR CHANNELS ASSOCIATED WITH CONTROL RESOURCE SET POOL INDEX VALUES | January 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17648860 | APPLYING A UNIFIED TRANSMISSION CONFIGURATION INDICATOR STATE INDICATION TO CHANNELS OR SIGNALS ASSOCIATED WITH A CONTROL RESOURCE SET POOL INDEX VALUE | January 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17628954 | Burst Traffic Detection Device and Method | January 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17627424 | LINK-ADAPTATION POWER BACKOFF | January 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17574972 | RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FOR REPORTING SIGNAL-TO-INTERFERENCE-PLUS-NOISE RATIO | January 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17556085 | Adaptive TTI Bundling Configuration | December 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17618629 | USER EQUIPMENT, BASE STATION, AND METHOD FOR TIME SYNCHRONIZATION | December 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17643120 | CROSS-LINK INTERFERENCE REPORTING IN FULL DUPLEX | December 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17538907 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COVERAGE ENHANCEMENT OF TERMINAL IN COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | November 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17533177 | Automotive physical layer (PHY) cable fault diagnosis | November 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17612847 | METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | November 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17530047 | APPARATUS AND METHOD OF UPLINK BEAMFORMING IN WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK SYSTEM | November 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17526821 | HIGH ORDER DIGITAL POST-DISTORTION PROCEDURES | November 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17522236 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR DETERMINING AND RECEIVING V2X MESSAGES | November 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17520247 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING DATA IN COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | November 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17515004 | DIS-AGGREGATED SWITCHING AND PROTOCOL CONFIGURABLE INPUT/OUTPUT MODULE | October 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17470323 | METHOD AND USER EQUIPMENT FOR HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST PROCESS OPERATION IN NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK | September 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17443926 | DOWNLINK CONTROL INFORMATION SIZE CONFIGURATION FOR MULTIPLE CARRIER SCHEDULING SCENARIOS | July 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17359539 | LOAD BALANCING AMONG OUTPUT PORTS | June 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17323563 | PHYSICAL LAYER PREAMBLE DESIGN | May 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17220731 | METHOD FOR SENDING RANDOM ACCESS PREAMBLE SEQUENCE, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM | April 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner MARKS, RACHEL ELIZABETH works in Art Unit 2412 and has examined 45 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 95.6%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.
Examiner MARKS, RACHEL ELIZABETH's allowance rate of 95.6% places them in the 87% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MARKS, RACHEL ELIZABETH receive 1.33 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 27% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MARKS, RACHEL ELIZABETH is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 27% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +8.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MARKS, RACHEL ELIZABETH. This interview benefit is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 66.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.