USPTO Examiner WARDEN JILL ALICE - Art Unit 1798

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17126317MULTI-STAGE TARGET CELL ENRICHMENT USING A MICROFLUIDIC DEVICEDecember 2020May 2023Abandon2810NoNo
16982016FLUID DEVICESeptember 2020September 2024Abandon4830NoNo
17015293METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING FOR TESTING PERMEABILITY AND RETENTION OF COMPOUNDS ACROSS BIOLOGICAL BARRIERSSeptember 2020March 2024Allow4221NoNo
16994163Systems and Methods for Automated AnalysisAugust 2020February 2024Allow4220YesNo
16967153DEVICE FOR THE AMBIENT-TEMPERATURE STORAGE OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIALAugust 2020July 2024Abandon4731NoNo
16939509INTERFACE MODULE FOR ROBOTIC LOADING AND UNLOADING OF A SAMPLE MANAGER FOR LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHYJuly 2020February 2024Allow4330YesNo
16889676Apparatus and method for collecting multi-tiered particles from a biological sampleJune 2020April 2022Abandon2310NoNo
16768136THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING ANALYTE CONCENTRATIONS IN SAMPLESMay 2020November 2024Allow5340YesNo
16851555DETECTION METHOD FOR CONGENERS OF SHORT-CHAIN CHLORINATED PARAFFINSApril 2020September 2024Abandon5340YesNo
16725183Peristaltic Pump Microfluidic SeparatorDecember 2019June 2022Allow3000YesNo
16660546REAGENT COMPONENT DISPENSING CAPS FOR REAGENT CONTAINERS USED IN AUTOMATED CLINICAL ANALYZERSOctober 2019January 2024Allow5031YesNo
16559641MICROFLUIDIC CHIP FOR SORTING SPERM AND SPERM SORTING METHODSeptember 2019December 2022Abandon3920NoNo
16487545Automatic AnalyzerAugust 2019July 2024Abandon5961YesNo
16524851METHOD TO CONTROL A PROCESS VARIABLEJuly 2019February 2025Allow6030NoNo
16457602METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SAMPLE PREPARATIONJune 2019September 2021Allow2710NoNo
16425796Microfluidic guillotine for splitting cellular structuresMay 2019May 2023Abandon4700YesNo
16389382BIOSENSORApril 2019August 2021Abandon2810NoNo
16342890ELECTRONIC DRIVING CIRCUIT FOR DRIVING ELECTRODES OF A MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE FOR MANIPULATION OF PARTICLES, AND CORRESPONDING ANALYSIS APPARATUSApril 2019May 2022Allow3711YesNo
16377395Incubation System and Method for Automated Cell Culture and TestingApril 2019January 2024Allow5831YesNo
16284845PROCESSING DEVICE FOR PROCESSING A HIGHLY VISCOUS SAMPLEFebruary 2019March 2022Abandon3601NoNo
16311557Assay Device and Method for Assessing Blood CellsDecember 2018October 2021Abandon3410NoNo
16141896SCANNING APPARATUS AND METHODS USEFUL FOR DETECTION OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ANALYTESSeptember 2018October 2019Allow1321YesNo
16110481Solid-Core MagnetAugust 2018March 2022Abandon4321NoNo
16072590ANALYSIS PLATE, ANALYSIS METHOD, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ANALYSIS PLATEJuly 2018March 2022Abandon4431YesNo
16033437NANO-SENSOR ARRAYJuly 2018September 2022Abandon5121NoYes
15991677METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF HEMOSTASISMay 2018October 2018Allow510YesNo
15757642Devices and Methods for Mesofluidic and/or Microfluidic ProcessesMarch 2018November 2022Abandon5731NoNo
15564447PROCESS CHALLENGE DEVICE FOR AUTOMATED ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOROctober 2017August 2023Abandon6060YesYes
15699567CELL SELECTING APPARATUS AND CELL SELECTING SYSTEMSeptember 2017February 2019Abandon1700NoNo
15656336SAMPLE EXTRACTING, DILUTING AND DISCHARGING DEVICEJuly 2017December 2018Abandon1710NoNo
15613562Mechanical Separator for a Biological FluidJune 2017December 2018Abandon1930NoNo
15486236SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC SYSTEM FOR MEASURING WATER QUALITYApril 2017May 2018Allow1420NoNo
15481698MULTI-LIQUID QUALITY CALIBRATION SINGLE-USE CARTRIDGEApril 2017January 2022Abandon5841NoNo
15513078CONTAINER ASSEMBLY AND CONTAINER ASSEMBLY KITMarch 2017June 2018Abandon1510NoNo
15463771SPECIMEN CONTAINER FOR BIOLOGICAL MATERIALSMarch 2017September 2018Abandon1810NoNo
15454819SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED PREPARATION OF CYTOLOGICAL SPECIMENSMarch 2017April 2018Abandon1300NoNo
15308330FLEXIBLE OPTICAL BIOSENSOR FOR POINT OF USE MULTI-PATHOGEN DETECTIONNovember 2016September 2022Allow6031YesYes
15290973INDUSTRIAL DESIGN OF STAND-ALONE ASSAY SYSTEMOctober 2016December 2021Abandon6031NoYes
15302794SPECTROSCOPIC SENSOR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEOctober 2016December 2021Abandon6080YesNo
15182506Method and Apparatus for Producing Platelet Rich PlasmaJune 2016December 2018Abandon3101NoNo
15150676WASH MONITOR AND METHOD OF USEMay 2016August 2018Abandon2710NoNo
15098800TEMPERATURE CONTROLLING SURFACES AND SUPPORT STRUCTURESApril 2016May 2020Allow4941YesNo
14972404ADAPTER FOR BLOOD SAMPLE DISPENSING, AND DISPENSING KIT AND NEEDLE KIT PROVIDED THEREWITHDecember 2015August 2018Abandon3210NoNo
14971947APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR SAMPLE HANDLING AND PROCESSINGDecember 2015August 2018Abandon3210NoNo
14953703GAS CHROMATOGRAPH INTERMEDIATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHNovember 2015June 2018Allow3120YesNo
14949385PROCESS FOR ULTRA-SENSITIVE QUANTIFICATION OF TARGET ANALYTES IN COMPLEX BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMSNovember 2015November 2022Allow6081YesNo
14779446Peristaltic Pump Microfluidic SeparatorSeptember 2015September 2019Allow4821YesYes
14729760SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS DEVICESJune 2015May 2018Allow3620YesNo
14629584Mechanical Separator for a Biological FluidFebruary 2015July 2018Abandon4140YesNo
14607769Beverage Preparation Machines and Methods For Operating Beverage Preparation MachinesJanuary 2015January 2017Allow2410YesNo
14599659METHOD FOR LASER MICRODISSECTIONJanuary 2015December 2019Allow5931NoYes
14550657METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTROL OF GENERAL PURPOSE MICROFLUIDIC DEVICESNovember 2014October 2019Allow5941NoNo
14524666DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYZING A LIQUID SPECIMENOctober 2014July 2018Abandon4540NoNo
14371339SENSOR CARTRIDGE FOR DETECTING COMPONENT OF AT LEAST ONE SAMPLEJuly 2014August 2016Allow2520YesNo
14308489VALIDATION TECHNIQUES FOR FLUID DELIVERY SYSTEMSJune 2014August 2015Allow1421YesNo
14298995SYSTEM FOR TREATING NOx-CONTAINING GAS STREAMSJune 2014May 2017Abandon3540NoNo
14295619SYSTEMS FOR RECOVERING NITRIC ACID FROM PICKLING SOLUTIONSJune 2014May 2017Abandon3540NoNo
14247796PYROLYSIS AND GASIFICATION SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND RESULTANTS DERIVED THEREFROMApril 2014January 2017Allow3420YesNo
14347541IN SITU SENSING OF COMPOUNDSMarch 2014August 2018Abandon5241NoNo
14197451INTEGRATED ACTIVE FLUX MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES AND METHODSMarch 2014May 2016Abandon2610NoNo
14194730MOVING PYROLYZING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR APPLYING THE APPARATUSMarch 2014March 2017Abandon3610NoNo
14187979LIQUID MIXTURE USED TO TEST AND VALIDATE TEST DEVICESFebruary 2014April 2015Abandon1420NoNo
14130693SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR CONVERSION OF ORGANIC MATTER INTO TORREFIED PRODUCTFebruary 2014December 2016Abandon3510NoNo
14125257SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING ACTIVE CARBON FROM COAL FLYASHFebruary 2014April 2017Abandon4010NoNo
14161447PHOTORESPONSIVE GAS-GENERATING MATERIAL, MICROPUMP AND MICROFLUID DEVICEJanuary 2014February 2016Abandon2410NoNo
14139490SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FOCUSING PARTICLESDecember 2013May 2016Allow2920YesNo
14128518APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR CONTINUOUS CARBONISATION OF WOOD CHIPS OR WASTES AND OTHER CHARRING ORGANIC MATERIALSDecember 2013November 2016Allow3410NoNo
13877720Microfluidic PlatformNovember 2013September 2016Abandon4220NoNo
14033435SYSTEM AND METHOD USING A HORIZONTAL SUBLIMATION CHAMBER FOR PRODUCTION OF FUEL FROM A CARBON-CONTAINING FEEDSTOCKSeptember 2013October 2016Allow3711NoNo
13989623SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR CONNECTING A GAS SOURCE TO A THERMAL OXIDISERSeptember 2013January 2017Abandon4410NoNo
14022303PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR DEVOLATIZING FEEDSTOCKSeptember 2013November 2016Allow3811NoNo
13879215Method for Treating Solid Waste Based on a Gradient Composed of Two Distinct Thermal SourcesSeptember 2013December 2016Allow4420NoNo
14014864SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MULTIPLEXED DIAGNOSTICSAugust 2013June 2016Allow3421YesNo
13978938SURFACE-TENSION BASED FLOW GUIDANCE IN A MICROSTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTJuly 2013March 2016Abandon3220NoNo
13936188Rotating Fluidized Bed Catalytic Pyrolysis ReactorJuly 2013February 2017Abandon4321NoNo
13919959REAGENT DELIVERY SYSTEM, DISPENSING DEVICE AND CONTAINER FOR A BIOLOGICAL STAINING APPARATUSJune 2013May 2015Allow2310NoNo
13989241SAMPLE CONTAINER FOR STORING AND PROCESSING SAMPLES TAKEN WITH A SAMPLING TOOLMay 2013July 2018Abandon6060YesNo
13836927PYROLYSIS APPARATUS AND METHODMarch 2013April 2017Abandon4930NoNo
13790781Hybrid Thermal Oxidizer Systems and MethodsMarch 2013August 2017Abandon5321NoYes
13784173CO2 RECOVERY SYSTEM AND CO2 RECOVERY METHODMarch 2013August 2016Allow4221NoNo
13781292METHODS, SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR MULTIPLE SINGLE-CELL CAPTURING AND PROCESSING USING MICROFLUIDICSFebruary 2013November 2015Allow3320YesNo
13781307METHODS, SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR MULTIPLE SINGLE-CELL CAPTURING AND PROCESSING USING MICROFLUIDICSFebruary 2013January 2016Allow3430YesNo
13764763GASIFICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HIGH ASH CONTENT FEEDSTOCKFebruary 2013January 2017Abandon4740YesNo
13809161AUTOMATIC ANALYZERJanuary 2013January 2015Allow2410YesNo
13713678CELL CAPTURING FILTER HAVING HIGH ASPECT RATIODecember 2012November 2014Allow2331NoNo
13712328Liquid Dietary Supplement Formulation CompositionsDecember 2012June 2018Allow6020YesYes
13554655MANIPULATING DROPLET SIZEJuly 2012November 2013Allow1600NoNo
13499421TESTING SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING HYPOXIA INDUCED CELLULAR DAMAGEApril 2012November 2016Abandon5621NoYes
13442013FLOW CELLS AND MANIFOLDS HAVING AN ELECTROOSMOTIC PUMPApril 2012December 2015Allow4521YesNo
13390154ASSAY DEVICEMarch 2012November 2018Allow6081NoYes
13406450MICROFLUIDIC SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAMEFebruary 2012June 2016Abandon5241YesNo
13331552Generating a Fluid Stream in a Microfluidic DeviceDecember 2011November 2018Allow6060NoYes
13294256HEATED MAT AND EXHAUST GAS TREATMENT DEVICENovember 2011November 2017Allow6030NoYes
13287012VITAMIN D METABOLITE DETERMINATION UTILIZING MASS SPECTROMETRY FOLLOWING DERIVATIZATIONNovember 2011January 2013Allow1530NoNo
13239779Tagging Of Small Containers For Biological And Chemical Samples With Light-Activated MicrotranspondersSeptember 2011April 2018Abandon6041NoYes
13139584PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN EDIBLE FAT CONTINUOUS SPREADSeptember 2011December 2016Abandon6040YesYes
13139580PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN EDIBLE FAT CONTINUOUS FOOD PRODUCTSeptember 2011January 2017Abandon6040NoYes
13143991SAMPLE HOLDER FOR USE IN BIOLOGICAL TESTINGJuly 2011May 2015Abandon4630NoNo
13174124METHOD FOR NON-INVASIVE DETERMINATION OF CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONSJune 2011February 2016Allow5611NoNo
13111722Testing Method and Kit for Detecting Lead, Mercury, and Chromate in Paint , Varnish, and Other surface CoatingsMay 2011April 2015Abandon4731NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WARDEN, JILL ALICE.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
16
Examiner Affirmed
13
(81.2%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(18.8%)
Reversal Percentile
31.0%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 18.8% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
31
Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(22.6%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
24
(77.4%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
31.6%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 22.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner WARDEN, JILL ALICE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WARDEN, JILL ALICE works in Art Unit 1798 and has examined 118 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 41.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WARDEN, JILL ALICE's allowance rate of 41.5% places them in the 9% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WARDEN, JILL ALICE receive 2.75 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 77% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WARDEN, JILL ALICE is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +38.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WARDEN, JILL ALICE. This interview benefit is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 9.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 72.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 40.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 36.4% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 90.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.8% of allowed cases (in the 65% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.