USPTO Examiner CAPOZZI CHARLES - Art Unit 1798

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19251191Rain Gutter Paint SleeveJune 2025November 2025Allow400NoNo
18645077SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED MATERIAL APPLICATION RATE CONTROLApril 2024October 2025Allow1801NoNo
18687334APPLICATORS FOR HIGH VISCOSITY MATERIALSFebruary 2024December 2025Allow2111NoNo
18005481METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMPREGNATING AT LEAST ONE FIBRE MATERIALNovember 2023December 2025Allow3511NoNo
18449750SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMAugust 2023August 2025Allow2501YesNo
18271224ELECTRODE SLURRY LOT INFORMATION TRACKING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND TRACKING MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREFORJuly 2023October 2025Allow2721NoNo
17988439CONTAINER ASSEMBLY FOR COLLECTING BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENSNovember 2022March 2026Abandon4001NoNo
17985734VACUUM CHAMBER, VACUUM SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VACUUM PROCESSINGNovember 2022January 2026Abandon3822NoNo
17924535COATING APPARATUS AND COATING METHOD CAPABLE OF EASILY ADJUSTING THICKNESS OF COATING LAYERNovember 2022December 2025Allow3731YesNo
17979103REPLACEABLE MOUTHPIECES FOR AEROSOL-GENERATING DEVICESNovember 2022January 2026Allow3820NoNo
17995924COATING BOOTH FOR COATING VEHICLE RIMSOctober 2022December 2025Allow3810NoNo
17942136SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE TREATING METHOD USING THE SAMESeptember 2022November 2025Allow3801NoNo
17891477Powder Suction And Discharge ApparatusAugust 2022December 2025Allow3910NoNo
17806537MANUFACTURING APPARATUS FOR MASK APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING MASK APPARATUS AND MASK APPARATUSJune 2022August 2025Allow3810NoNo
17725590SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING PRESENCE AND/OR CHARACTERISTICS OF TARGET ANALYTES IN A SAMPLEApril 2022January 2026Allow4511NoNo
17683051SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUMFebruary 2022October 2025Allow4321YesNo
17630217DETECTION OF VOLATILESJanuary 2022March 2026Abandon4910NoNo
17595677A METHOD FOR REALISING CERAMIC SLABS OR TILESNovember 2021October 2025Allow4720YesNo
17372148METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING SOLVENT CONSUMPTIONJuly 2021December 2025Allow5341YesNo
17282280METHOD FOR CLEANING A VACUUM SYSTEM, METHOD FOR VACUUM PROCESSING OF A SUBSTRATE, AND APPARATUS FOR VACUUM PROCESSING A SUBSTRATEApril 2021August 2025Allow5340YesNo
17031838AUTOMATED PIZZA ASSEMBLY SYSTEM INCLUDING MEASURING DEVICESeptember 2020August 2025Allow5951YesNo
16417351Resin Application Tip for a Cut EdgeMay 2019December 2019Allow600NoNo
16264601SLURRY SPRAYING MASK AND SLURRY SPRAYING JIGJanuary 2019May 2021Allow2710NoNo
16191080ADHESIVE APPLICATION APPARATUS FOR TILESNovember 2018April 2019Allow500NoNo
16086446PAINT DRYING OVENSeptember 2018March 2020Allow1810NoNo
16002985DEPOSITION MASK AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING DEPOSITION MASKJune 2018February 2019Allow800YesNo
15865583EVAPORATION DEVICE AND EVAPORATION METHOD USING THE SAMEJanuary 2018June 2020Allow3011NoNo
15783952APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR APPLYING A FLUID TO AN OBJECT SURFACEOctober 2017July 2020Allow3311NoNo
15326108POWDER COATING APPARATUSJanuary 2017November 2019Allow3440NoYes
15176983SELECTIVE COATING OF A COMPONENT USING A POTTING PROCESSJune 2016September 2016Allow400NoNo
14773146COMPLEX SHOWERHEAD COATING APPARATUS WITH ELECTROSPRAY FOR LITHIUM ION BATTERYSeptember 2015April 2017Allow2011YesNo
14729781Curtain Coating DeviceJune 2015April 2017Allow2200NoNo
14545591Protective shield for painting and the like, and method of useMay 2015June 2017Allow2511YesNo
14376860CHARGED PARTICLE DEVICE AND WIRING METHODAugust 2014February 2018Allow4221NoNo
14445211AUTOMATIC TURNING DEVICE AND SPRAYING SYSTEM USING THE SAMEJuly 2014September 2016Allow2610NoNo
14354325Liquid Crystal Dropping Device and Liquid Crystal Dropping MethodApril 2014June 2017Allow3721NoNo
14063198Coating equipment for a composite membrane without a diffusion pump and its thickness gauge for both thick and thin coatingsOctober 2013April 2016Allow3020NoNo
14062578MASK FOR DEPOSITION PROCESSOctober 2013March 2016Allow2910YesNo
14008544APPARATUS FOR COATING A MOVING STRIP MATERIAL WITH A METALLIC COATING MATERIALOctober 2013August 2016Allow3520YesNo
14048644METHOD AND DEVICE FOR COATING OF A MEDICAL IMPLANTOctober 2013December 2016Allow3820YesYes
13968354APPARATUS FOR SUBSTRATE DOUBLE-SURFACE HOLE-FILLINGAugust 2013June 2017Allow4640YesNo
13802304GAS ENCLOSURE ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEMMarch 2013December 2014Allow2111YesNo
13720830Gas Enclosure Assembly and SystemDecember 2012October 2014Allow2111YesNo
13652857APPARATUS FOR SLOT DIE SETUP AND CONTROL DURING COATINGOctober 2012September 2013Allow1110YesNo
13637627DEPOSITION APPARATUS AND DEPOSITION METHODSeptember 2012April 2015Allow3011YesNo
13592140EMISSION ATTENUATED LINING APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR STRUCTURESAugust 2012February 2013Allow610YesNo
13568979System and Process for Coating an ObjectAugust 2012February 2015Allow3131YesNo
13534895SEASONING APPARATUS AND METHODJune 2012October 2015Allow4021YesNo
13524123SYSTEMS, ASSEMBLIES, AND METHODS FOR PROGRAMMING ROBOTIC SYSTEMSJune 2012June 2016Allow4812YesNo
13394271Coating Method and Coating ApparatusMay 2012September 2016Allow5521YesNo
13481022System and Process for Coating an ObjectMay 2012December 2014Allow3111YesNo
13505032System for Treating and Conveying ObjectsApril 2012February 2017Allow5830YesNo
13427307LIQUID COATINGMarch 2012July 2015Allow4031YesNo
13363545ADHESIVE APPLICATION APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD OF THE SAMEFebruary 2012April 2014Allow2711YesNo
13342783System for Coating a StentJanuary 2012May 2013Allow1601YesNo
13340600MASK FOR USE IN EVAPORATION COATING PROCESSDecember 2011November 2013Allow2311YesNo
13269505STENT SUPPORT DEVICESOctober 2011December 2012Allow1401YesNo
13184712ROTATABLE SUPPORT ELEMENTS FOR STENTSJuly 2011April 2013Allow2101NoNo
13152154APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR POSITIONING A SUBSTRATE USING CAPACITIVE SENSORSJune 2011September 2015Allow5231YesNo
13094252COATED WEB MANUFACTURING MACHINEApril 2011February 2016Allow5861NoNo
13047360Apparatus for Making Epitaxial FilmMarch 2011December 2012Allow2220YesNo
13035811Pressure Chamber And Apparatus For Loading Material Into A Stent StrutFebruary 2011July 2016Allow6021YesNo
13027028Compositions of Corrosion-resistant Fe-Based Amorphous Metals Suitable for Producing Thermal Spray CoatingsFebruary 2011January 2013Allow2340YesYes
13008670ELECTROSTATIC COATING APPARATUSJanuary 2011July 2011Allow610NoNo
12981759Flux MonitorDecember 2010September 2013Allow3301YesNo
12968114Method and Apparatus for Material DepositionDecember 2010March 2013Allow2711NoNo
12956790WIDE-SLOT NOZZLENovember 2010March 2013Allow2710YesNo
12991450DUAL MODE PUMP CONTROLNovember 2010June 2015Allow5540YesNo
12860533MASK CARRIER, MASK HANDLING MODULE AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING A MASKAugust 2010February 2016Allow6041NoNo
12835345Method and Apparatus for Thermal Spraying of Metal Coatings Using Pulsejet Resonant Pulsed CombustionJuly 2010May 2014Allow4730YesNo
12820265APPARATUS FOR SLOT DIE SETUP AND CONTROL DURING COATINGJune 2010February 2012Allow2011NoNo
12774986VALVEMay 2010May 2013Allow3611YesNo
12754470APPARATUS FOR RESIN IMPREGNATIONApril 2010September 2014Allow5421YesNo
12693505COMPOSITE COATING APPARATUS INCLUDING Q-SWITCH LASER SOURCEJanuary 2010December 2012Allow3510NoNo
12683575APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PREPARING COMPOSITE PARTICULATESJanuary 2010June 2013Allow4140YesNo
12634326LOW CAPACITANCE CONTAINER COATING SYSTEM AND METHODDecember 2009February 2013Allow3911YesNo
12589711APPARATUS FOR FORMING A FLEXIBLE NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIAL FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELSOctober 2009August 2012Allow3400YesNo
12554671SYSTEM FOR COATING A STENTSeptember 2009June 2013Allow4621YesNo
12523972DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING SUBSTRATE AND EXAMINER FOR SEAL PATTERN OF LCD CELL USING THE SAMEJuly 2009November 2014Allow6030YesNo
12478561APPARATUS FOR SIMULTANEOUS ROLL-TO-ROLL WET PROCESSING OF TWO WORKPIECES DISPOSED WITHIN A SINGLE CHAMBERJune 2009November 2011Abandon3020NoNo
12473966DROPLET DISCHARGE DEVICE, METHOD FOR DISCHARGING DROPLET, METHOD FOR FORMING PATTERN, PATTERN FORMED MEMBER, ELECTRO-OPTICAL DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMay 2009August 2012Allow3901YesNo
12463303APPARATUS FOR CONTINUOUS PROCESSING OF BUFFER LAYERS FOR GROUP IBIIIAVIA SOLAR CELLSMay 2009March 2012Allow3520NoNo
12385184Method of and apparatus for synthesizing highly oriented, aligned carbon nanotubes from an organic liquidApril 2009July 2014Allow6051YesNo
12406673APPLICATION LIQUID SUPPLY APPARATUS AND INKJET RECORDING APPARATUSMarch 2009April 2012Allow3720YesNo
12393552BLISTER PACKAGE ASSEMBLY AND METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEFebruary 2009October 2012Allow4411NoNo
12318090Liquid application apparatus, liquid application method, inkjet recording apparatus and inkjet recording methodDecember 2008February 2013Allow4911NoNo
12333226MODULAR FLOW CELL AND ADJUSTMENT SYSTEMDecember 2008March 2015Allow6040YesNo
12313543REAGENT ACTIVATOR FOR ELECTROLESS PLATINGNovember 2008September 2011Allow3410NoNo
12177853DEPOSITION APPARATUS WITH GUIDE ROLLER FOR LONG SUPERCONDUCTING TAPEJuly 2008September 2012Allow5010NoNo
12174867SLOT NOZZLE ASSEMBLY, SLOT COATING GUN, SHIM PLATE, AND METHOD OF EXTRUDING A FOAMABLE MELTED MATERIAL IN A WIDE BANDJuly 2008September 2012Allow5031YesNo
12167377ROLLER APPLICATORJuly 2008February 2012Allow4310YesNo
12147471AEROSOL-GENERTING APPARATUS, FILM-FORMING APPARATUS, AND AEROSOL-GENERATING METHODJune 2008September 2013Allow6031YesNo
12132369ADJUSTABLE PROTECTIVE PAINT SHIELDJune 2008January 2012Allow4400NoNo
12115085SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS TO PREVENT THE FORMATION OF LUBRICANT LINES ON MAGNETIC MEDIAMay 2008June 2015Allow6041YesNo
11967005PLATING APPARATUSDecember 2007December 2011Allow4811YesNo
11966809Vented Combinatorial Processing CellDecember 2007December 2014Allow6030YesNo
11922291APPARATUS FOR FORMING LAYERED OBJECTDecember 2007June 2012Allow5430YesNo
11953992DEVICE WITH SLOTTED NOZZLE ASSEMBLY FOR DISPENSING FLUIDDecember 2007January 2015Allow6030YesNo
11937226DIP COATING SYSTEM WITH STEPPED APRON RECOVERYNovember 2007November 2011Allow4831YesNo
11867818Apparatus for Holding a Medical Device During CoatingOctober 2007December 2013Allow6020YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CAPOZZI, CHARLES.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
3
Examiner Affirmed
1
(33.3%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(66.7%)
Reversal Percentile
85.9%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 66.7% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
10
Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(60.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(40.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
88.6%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 60.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner CAPOZZI, CHARLES - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CAPOZZI, CHARLES works in Art Unit 1798 and has examined 99 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 99.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 42 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CAPOZZI, CHARLES's allowance rate of 99.0% places them in the 92% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CAPOZZI, CHARLES receive 2.16 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 59% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CAPOZZI, CHARLES is 42 months. This places the examiner in the 18% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +3.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CAPOZZI, CHARLES. This interview benefit is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 32.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 11.1% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 38.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.0% of allowed cases (in the 79% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.