Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18904871 | PHOTOCATALYTIC DEGRADATION AND REMOVAL OF IMIDACLOPRID INSECTICIDE USING HYDROPHILIC MAGNETIC COVALENT ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS (COFs) | October 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 9 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18203892 | PRODUCT FOR PFAS ADSORPTION | May 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18131506 | ELECTROLYTE AND LITHIUM ION BATTERY | April 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18171757 | WATER PRODUCTION FACILITY AND METHOD OF REPLACING ION EXCHANGE RESIN | February 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18007346 | LITHIUM-ION BATTERY POSITIVE ELECTRODE LITHIUM SUPPLEMENT ADDITIVE, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY | January 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18013690 | BATTERY AND BATTERY HOLDER ARRANGEMENT FOR A LIGHT ELECTRIC VEHICLE | December 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17927079 | HOME TOILET WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM COMPRISING BIO-TREATMENT DEVICE AND COMBUSTION DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR TREATING TOILET WASTE BY USING SAME | November 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17927091 | WATER PURIFIER FILTER AND WATER PURIFIER COMPRISING SAME | November 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17985306 | METHOD FOR REMOVING ORGANIC POLLUTANTS FROM WATER BODIES BY ACTIVATING PERSULFATE WITH NUTRIENT-ENHANCED SOYBEAN SPROUT-BASED BIOCHAR | November 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17922811 | BATTERY MODULE, AND BATTERY PACK AND VEHICLE COMPRISING SAME | November 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17887593 | FILTER DEVICE AND FILTER ELEMENT | August 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17883185 | FILTER ELEMENT FOR AN AIR FILTER HAVING A PRIMARY AIR OUTLET AND A SECONDARY AIR OUTLET, AND AN AIR FILTER AND INSTALLATION METHOD | August 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17794319 | TWO-PIECE OIL FILTER ASSEMBLY FOR PUMPS | July 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17721256 | WATER PURIFIER AND SUPPLY IN A VEHICLE | April 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17679607 | METHOD OF PRODUCING NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY, AND NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL | February 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17669070 | ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE BATTERY PRESSURE RELIEF STRUCTURE | February 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17431124 | ELECTROLYSIS CELL FOR AN ELECTROLYTIC TREATMENT OF A LIQUID | August 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 11877454 | NITRIC OXIDE SENSOR | October 2007 | November 2010 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 11576211 | DEVICE FOR DIELECTROPHORETIC SEPARATION OF PARTICLES CONTAINED IN A FLUID | July 2007 | July 2011 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11684819 | PARALLEL PLATE ELECTRODES FOR PARTICLE CONCENTRATION OR REMOVAL | March 2007 | June 2011 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner DIETERLE, JENNIFER M works in Art Unit 1776 and has examined 4 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.
Examiner DIETERLE, JENNIFER M's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by DIETERLE, JENNIFER M receive 2.25 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DIETERLE, JENNIFER M is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DIETERLE, JENNIFER M. This interview benefit is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 25.0% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 7% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.