Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18435347 | CALIBRATION METHOD AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEM | February 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18319979 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING FUNDUS IMAGE BASED ON DYNAMIC WEIGHTED ATTENTION MECHANISM | May 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18304549 | EFFICIENT MOTION ESTIMATION IN AN IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE | April 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18296213 | FIXED-SIZE IMAGE ALPHA CHANNEL COMPRESSION TECHNIQUES | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13947719 | System and Method for Linking Real-World Objects and Object Representations by Pointing | July 2013 | August 2013 | Allow | 1 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 10692834 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTION OF DROWSINESS AND QUANTITATIVE CONTROL OF BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES | October 2003 | September 2007 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10692185 | METHOD FOR IMAGING OF PRE-STACK SEISMIC DATA | October 2003 | April 2007 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10437070 | METHOD AND A DEVICE FOR DETECTING A WATERMARK IN DIGITAL DATA | May 2003 | September 2007 | Allow | 52 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10435725 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A MEASURE OF PERFORMANCE OF REGION OF INTEREST IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHMS | May 2003 | April 2007 | Allow | 48 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner WANG, CLAIRE X works in Art Unit 1774 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.
Examiner WANG, CLAIRE X's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by WANG, CLAIRE X receive 0.80 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WANG, CLAIRE X is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WANG, CLAIRE X. This interview benefit is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 20.0% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 40.0% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.