Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18770966 | NON-ORTHOGONAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND THE TREATMENT OF PARTS MANUFACTURED THEREOF | July 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 18674983 | Blow- Molded Panel and Manufacturing Method for Blow-Molded Panel | May 2024 | September 2025 | Abandon | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18428346 | Pure Layered Stretch Film Produced Using Single Pass Extrusion Resins | January 2024 | January 2026 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18457912 | METHODS OF PRODUCING CARBON/CARBON COMPOSITE PREFORMS AND CARBON/CARBON COMPOSITES FORMED THEREFROM | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18209054 | Processes For Polymerizing Alpha-Olefins, Internal Olefins And Compositions Thereof | June 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 18329714 | IMPRINT APPARATUS, IMPRINT METHOD, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ARTICLE | June 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 18039916 | MOLDED ARTICLE MANUFACTURING METHOD, RESIN IMPREGNATING APPARATUS, AND 3D PRINTER | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18029084 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING OF METAL OBJECTS USING BINDING AGENT WITH COPPER NITRATE | March 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18080770 | AGENT CONTAINING EMULSIFIER AND MICROCAPSULES | December 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18001769 | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A COMPOSITE PART FOR A TURBOMACHINE | December 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18072281 | GYRO DROP APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME | November 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17999453 | HEATING OVEN AND METHOD OF USE | November 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17903689 | IMAGE PRESENTATION SYSTEM FOR AMUSEMENT PARK ATTRACTION SYSTEM | September 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17898790 | STARTING BLOCK OR BASE PLATE WITH A SUPPORTING LEDGE DEVICE FOR A START OF A BACKSTROKE RACE | August 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17801699 | TURF SYSTEM FOR SPORTS OR DECORATIVE USE AND METHOD FOR POSITIONING SUCH SYSTEM | August 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17760477 | A PROCESS FOR SYNTHESIS OF CARBON BEADS | August 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17880174 | ROBOTIC ARM INTEGRATED IMMERSIVE REALITY | August 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17797167 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAKING OBJECTS FROM RECYCLED POLYMERIC MATERIAL | August 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17849535 | LOOSE TUBE-TYPE OPTICAL CABLE PRODUCTION DEVICE AND PRODUCTION METHOD | June 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17808530 | FERRIS WHEEL INSTALLATION COMPRISING A GUIDE STRUCTURE FOR GONDOLAS HAVING SLIDING BALL JOINTS | June 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17826089 | MOLDING APPARATUS, MOLDING METHOD, AND ARTICLE MANUFACTURING METHOD | May 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 43 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17762468 | Thermoplastic Resin Composition | March 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17683733 | Cake Decorating Tool | March 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17626020 | ACRYLIC RUBBER EXCELLENT IN STORAGE STABILITY | January 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17616042 | NON-DEGRADING SWELLABLE POLYMERS AS MATERIALS FOR BIOMEDICAL DEVICES | December 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17437245 | CLEANING OF FOOD PRODUCT MOULDING INSERTS | September 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17263838 | AMORPHOUS COPOLYMERIZED POLYESTER RAW MATERIAL FOR A FILM, HEAT-SHRINKABLE POLYESTER-BASED FILM, HEAT-SHRINKABLE LABEL, AND PACKAGING BAG | January 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner DEL SOLE, JOSEPH STEVEN works in Art Unit 1763 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 66.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.
Examiner DEL SOLE, JOSEPH STEVEN's allowance rate of 66.7% places them in the 27% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by DEL SOLE, JOSEPH STEVEN receive 2.67 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 78% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DEL SOLE, JOSEPH STEVEN is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +100.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DEL SOLE, JOSEPH STEVEN. This interview benefit is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 6% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 7% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.