Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17253388 | SIZE-BASED SEPARATION METHOD FOR HIGHLY CONCENTRATING EXTRACELLULAR VESICLE IN FLUID SAMPLE | December 2020 | May 2024 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16978291 | METHOD FOR DETECTING ALLERGIC DISEASES | November 2020 | April 2024 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17089003 | Membrane Probes for Expansion Microscopy | November 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17082370 | SPECIFIC MATERIALS THAT CAN BE USED FOR THE DETECTION OF AT LEAST ONE ALKALINE ELEMENT | October 2020 | August 2024 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17051119 | MAGNETIC BEAD PURIFICATION SYSTEM | October 2020 | October 2024 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17050759 | METHOD FOR MEASURING INTRACELLULAR POTENTIAL WITH A CAPACITANCE TYPE POTENTIAL MEASUREMENT DEVICE | October 2020 | January 2025 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17077828 | COLUMN-BASED DEVICE FOR RETRIEVAL OF RARE CELLS BASED ON SIZE, AND USES THEREOF | October 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17073608 | METHOD FOR PREPARING ANALYSIS SAMPLE, ANALYSIS METHOD, AND KIT FOR PREPARING ANALYSIS SAMPLE | October 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17048997 | MICROFLUIDIC BOARD AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME | October 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17040389 | HIGH-SPEED POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION ANALYSIS PLATE | September 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17040064 | OPTICAL REACTION WELL FOR ASSAY DEVICE | September 2020 | December 2022 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17017284 | MOLECULE DETECTING DEVICE AND MOLECULE DETECTING METHOD | September 2020 | April 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16978438 | MODULAR FLUIDIC CHIP AND FLUIDIC FLOW SYSTEM COMPRISING SAME | September 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16992248 | BIOLOGICAL DETECTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TOILET WATER SOLUTION | August 2020 | October 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16984955 | MICROFLUIDIC PROBE HEAD WITH BARRIER PROJECTIONS | August 2020 | February 2024 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16984852 | MICROFLUIDIC PROBE HEAD WITH ASPIRATION POSTS | August 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16932729 | Rapid Method of Forensic Toxicology in Post-Mortem Individuals Using Muscle Tissue Testing | July 2020 | July 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16931468 | STRIP DETECTING APPARATUS | July 2020 | October 2024 | Abandon | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16634559 | Physical Model for Evaluation of Heat Treatment | January 2020 | February 2024 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 16631706 | Method for Quantitative Analysis of Hydrogen in Porous Silica | January 2020 | February 2024 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner HUANG, MICKEY NMN works in Art Unit 1758 and has examined 20 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 65.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.
Examiner HUANG, MICKEY NMN's allowance rate of 65.0% places them in the 27% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by HUANG, MICKEY NMN receive 2.05 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 50% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HUANG, MICKEY NMN is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 10% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +77.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HUANG, MICKEY NMN. This interview benefit is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 6% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 6% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.