USPTO Examiner LOUIE PHILIP Y - Art Unit 1755

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18849639POUCHED PRODUCT FOR ORAL USESeptember 2024July 2025Allow910YesNo
18025539Liquid-Tight Refillable Cartridge for an Electronic Smoking DeviceMarch 2023December 2025Abandon3401NoNo
18017959Heater Device ComponentJanuary 2023November 2025Abandon3301NoNo
18005247Method of Managing an Aerosol-Generating DeviceJanuary 2023September 2025Allow3211YesNo
18081278AEROSOL DELIVERY DEVICE WITH AUTOMATIC CONSUMABLE LOADING AND EJECTINGDecember 2022October 2025Allow3420NoYes
17982150FRESH / CLEAN SMOKING SYSTEMNovember 2022July 2025Allow3320YesNo
17810968BOX TIP Vape n ScrapeJuly 2022April 2025Abandon3310YesNo
17839156NOVEL EMOLLIENT COMPOSITIONJune 2022March 2023Allow920NoNo
17826513ELECTRONIC ATOMIZATION DEVICE, ATOMIZATION CORE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFORMay 2022June 2025Abandon3711NoNo
17772753Aerosol-Generating Tobacco-Containing Composition Comprising Medium-Chain TriglycerideApril 2022August 2025Abandon3901NoNo
17708833SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING OLEFINS FROM CRUDE OILMarch 2022March 2023Allow1220YesNo
17701643Handheld Vaping ImplementMarch 2022May 2025Allow3810NoNo
17699153HEATING ASSEMBLY AND VAPING DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAMEMarch 2022June 2025Abandon3930NoNo
17654774HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION SYSTEMMarch 2022January 2023Allow1001YesNo
17693399AEROSOL-GENERATING ARTICLE AND AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEM COMPRISING THE SAMEMarch 2022May 2025Abandon3920NoNo
17588285KIEF COINJanuary 2022August 2025Abandon4320NoNo
17562484ATOMIZER AND ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICE HAVING THE SAMEDecember 2021August 2023Abandon1910NoNo
17528675CONVERSION OF ETHANE TO ETHYLENENovember 2021January 2023Allow1410NoNo
17525941ATOMIZER AND ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE COMPRISING THE SAMENovember 2021June 2025Abandon4330NoNo
17523868ELECTRONIC CIGARETTENovember 2021May 2025Abandon4230NoNo
17518441COLLECTION AND STORAGE DEVICE FOR ACCESSORIES AND OTHER ORGANIC OR NON-ORGANIC DISPOSABLESNovember 2021November 2023Abandon2410NoNo
17488819System and Method of Reducing Emissions And Increasing Swell In An Oil Conditioning ProcessSeptember 2021March 2023Allow1711YesNo
17488869GLASS TIP FOR USE WITH SMOKABLE SUBSTANCES CONTAINED WITHIN A WRAP AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE TIPSeptember 2021January 2024Abandon2711NoNo
17476451REPLACEABLE OIL TANK-TYPE ATOMIZED SMOKE CARTRIDGESeptember 2021January 2024Abandon2810NoNo
17434682SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING ELECTRONIC-CIGARETTE AUTHENTICITY, SMOKING SET, ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2021September 2025Abandon4921NoNo
17401736ACTIVATED CARBON AND CATALYST FILTERAugust 2021January 2023Allow1710NoNo
17399298THREE-PIECE BOWL FOR A WATER PIPEAugust 2021December 2023Abandon2810NoNo
17393460SMOKING DEVICE HOLDER CONFIGURED TO BE HOUSED IN AN ICE BLOCKAugust 2021November 2023Abandon2710NoNo
17425601Shisha Cartridge with CapJuly 2021June 2025Allow4720NoNo
17370059Novel Multipurpose Fast Dehumidification DeviceJuly 2021September 2023Abandon2610NoNo
17358179Multifunctional AshtrayJune 2021July 2024Abandon3720NoNo
17356117SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION COUPLED PROCESS WITH HIGH HELIUM YIELD AND DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTSJune 2021March 2023Allow2110NoNo
17338064Composite Materials Containing Alkyl-Aryl Amine Rich Molecules and Mesoporous Supports for Direct Air CO2 CaptureJune 2021May 2023Abandon2310NoNo
17243048ATTACHABLE VAPORIZERSApril 2021August 2024Abandon3920YesNo
17237592CIRCULAR ECONOMY FOR PLASTIC WASTE TO POLYETHYLENE VIA OIL REFINERY WITH FILTERING AND METAL OXIDE TREATMENT OF PYROLYSIS OILApril 2021February 2023Allow2210NoNo
17228874PHOTOCATALYST COMPRISING BIMETALLIC NANOPARTICLES AND GRAPHENE OXIDE FOR DENITRIFICATION REACTION, AND WATER TREATMENT METHOD USING SAMEApril 2021March 2023Allow2311YesNo
17280635SMOKING ARTICLE INCLUDING MULTILAYER MEDIUM PORTIONMarch 2021May 2025Abandon5030YesNo
17211690DEVICES FOR HARVESTING DRINKING WATER FROM AIR USING SOLAR ENERGY AND HEAT RECUPERATIONMarch 2021August 2023Abandon2910NoNo
17202009FUEL GAS CONDITIONING SYSTEM AND METHODMarch 2021February 2023Allow2301NoNo
17198346METHOD OF REDUCING MERCURY IN STABILIZED CONDENSATEMarch 2021July 2023Abandon2820NoNo
17164088FILTRATION IN GAS DEHYDRATIONFebruary 2021December 2022Allow2301YesNo
17148311HEAT NOT BURN ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING TEMPERATURE OF THE SAMEJanuary 2021November 2023Abandon3410NoNo
17128178HIGH-FREQUENCY HEATING DEVICEDecember 2020January 2025Abandon4930NoNo
17117091HEATING CUPDecember 2020November 2024Abandon4830NoNo
17107961PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH DUAL CHANNELSDecember 2020August 2023Abandon3301NoNo
16982019CIGARETTE PACKING PROCESSES, SYSTEMS, AND PRODUCTSSeptember 2020July 2024Abandon4631NoNo
17015060ATOMIZER AND ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE COMPRISING THE SAMESeptember 2020November 2023Abandon3820NoNo
17010969AROMATIZATION OF LIGHT HYDROCARBONS USING METAL-MODIFIED ZEOLITE CATALYSTSSeptember 2020January 2023Allow2930YesNo
17003988DISPOSABLE ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF PUFFS AND ITS CONTROL METHODAugust 2020March 2024Abandon4310NoNo
16817756Processes for Producing XylenesMarch 2020August 2023Abandon4140NoNo
16637033ABSORPTION COLUMN HAVING EXTERNAL HEAT EXCHANGE CIRCUITFebruary 2020August 2022Allow3110NoNo
16559281SMOKING SYSTEM, POWER SUPPLY CONTROL METHOD, PROGRAM, PRIMARY DEVICE, AND SECONDARY DEVICESeptember 2019March 2024Abandon5410NoNo
16382646FILTRATION STRUCTURE FOR CARBON DIOXIDE SCRUBBERApril 2019September 2023Abandon5340NoNo
16123707METHOD FOR FORMING A ZEOLITE CATALYST AND USE THEREOF TO FORM A BTX-RICH STREAMSeptember 2018October 2018Allow100NoNo
16123630PROCESS FOR FORMING A XYLENE-RICH STREAMSeptember 2018November 2018Allow300NoNo
15975114FIXED-BED ALKYL-AROMATIC CONVERSION PROCESSMay 2018August 2018Allow310NoNo
15703382Energy Efficient Methods for Isomerization of a C5-C7 Fraction with Dividing Wall Fractional DistillationSeptember 2017August 2018Allow1100NoNo
15658879PROCESS FOR FORMING ETHYLENE AND PROPYLENE BY HYDROCRACKINGJuly 2017August 2017Allow100NoNo
15593847HYDROCARBON CONVERSIONMay 2017September 2017Allow410NoNo
15593984Hydrocarbon ConversionMay 2017January 2018Allow810NoNo
15489382CATALYTIC HYDROCRACKING OF LIGHT OLEFINSApril 2017July 2017Allow310NoNo
15270179PROCESS FOR PRODUCING XYLENE USING A METAL-DOPED ZEOLITE CATALYSTSeptember 2016April 2018Allow1811NoNo
15159161FARNESANE ALKYLATIONMay 2016September 2017Allow1610NoNo
15159205HIGH VISCOSITY INDEX LUBRICANTS BY ISOALKANE ALKYLATIONMay 2016May 2018Allow2430YesNo
15153612Chemical Conversion of Carbon Dioxide and Water to Hydrocarbon FuelsMay 2016October 2017Allow1710NoNo
14997304DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING NATURAL GAS HYDRATEJanuary 2016September 2018Allow3210NoNo
14868426METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROCESSING CELLULOSIC BIOMASSSeptember 2015April 2017Allow1810NoNo
14868542METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROCESSING CELLULOSIC BIOMASSSeptember 2015April 2017Allow1810NoNo
14868435METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROCESSING CELLULOSIC BIOMASSSeptember 2015April 2017Allow1810NoNo
14791999USE OF CATALYST PREPARED WITH A SUBGROUP VI ELEMENT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS AND FUELS FROM LIGNINJuly 2015May 2017Allow2330YesNo
14574311SELECTIVE HYDROGENATION METHODDecember 2014April 2017Allow2710YesNo
14563701PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF N-PROPYL BENZENEDecember 2014February 2017Allow2610NoNo
14538993PROCESSES AND CATALYSTS FOR PRODUCTION OF LIGHT OLEFINSNovember 2014January 2017Allow2611YesNo
14485957METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING HYDROGEN TO A HYDROCATALYTIC REACTIONSeptember 2014January 2017Allow2810NoNo
14472658TRANSALKYLATION / DISPROPORTIONATION OR THERMAL HYDRODEALKYLATION HYDROCARBON PROCESSING METHODS AND SYSTEMS EMPLOYING AN INCREASED ETHYLBENZENE FEED CONTENTAugust 2014August 2017Allow3520NoNo
14045094Reduction In Flushing Volume In An Adsorptive Separation SystemOctober 2013May 2014Allow720YesNo
13808010PROCESS FOR THE SELECTIVE HYDROGENATION OF MULTIPLY UNSATURATED HYDROCARBONS IN OLEFIN-CONTAINING HYDROCARBON MIXTURESMarch 2013June 2014Allow1820NoYes
13732798METHODS FOR PRODUCING SYNTHETIC FUELJanuary 2013March 2015Allow2620YesNo
13714542METHOD FOR CONVERTING BIOMASS INTO LIQUID FUELDecember 2012May 2016Allow4120YesNo
13455743METHOD AND A DEVICE FOR GENERATING A CARBURIZING GAS MIXTUREApril 2012February 2016Allow4531NoNo
13381735METHOD FOR PRODUCING LOW-ODOR N-BUTANEFebruary 2012May 2014Allow2820YesNo
13381680PREPARATION OF ISOBUTENE BY DISSOCIATION OF MTBEFebruary 2012October 2014Allow3321YesNo
13331384USE OF SUPPORTED RUTHENIUM-CARBENE COMPLEXES IN CONTINUOUSLY OPERATED REACTORSDecember 2011September 2014Allow3320YesNo
13265508METHODS OF PREPARING OIL COMPOSITIONS FOR FUEL REFININGDecember 2011May 2015Allow4321NoNo
13287540PROCESS FOR PREPARING A PHENYLCYCLOHEXANENovember 2011October 2013Allow2310NoNo
13102384FLEXIBLE PROCESS FOR TRANSFORMATION OF ETHANOL INTO MIDDLE DISTILLATES IMPLEMENTING A HOMOGENEOUS CATALYTIC SYSTEM AND A HETEROGENEOUS CATALYTIC SYSTEMMay 2011November 2015Allow5440YesYes
12993956PROCESS FOR OBTAINING BENZENE, TOLUENE (AND NAPHTHALENE) FROM C1-C4-ALKANES WITH CO-DOSAGE OF HYDROGEN AT A SEPERATE LOCATIONFebruary 2011March 2014Allow4030NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LOUIE, PHILIP Y.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
51.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner LOUIE, PHILIP Y - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LOUIE, PHILIP Y works in Art Unit 1755 and has examined 71 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 63.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LOUIE, PHILIP Y's allowance rate of 63.4% places them in the 24% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LOUIE, PHILIP Y receive 1.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LOUIE, PHILIP Y is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +32.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LOUIE, PHILIP Y. This interview benefit is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 52.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 6% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 6% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.