Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18609225 | ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERY | March 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18343834 | LIQUID COOLING UNIT | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17767344 | BATTERY PACK AND DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | April 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17767156 | BATTERY PACK AND DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | April 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17709943 | ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17673367 | BATTERY SYSTEM AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE BATTERY SYSTEM | February 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 30 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17601649 | HEAT INSULATING MATERIAL COMPOSITION, HEAT INSULATING MATERIAL, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | January 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17578460 | POSITIVE ELECTRODE AND ELECTRICITY STORAGE DEVICE | January 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17577959 | ALL SOLID STATE BATTERY | January 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17625011 | Secondary Battery And Method For Manufacturing The Same | January 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17551634 | POWER STORAGE MODULE | December 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17551426 | POWER STORAGE MODULE | December 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17542507 | NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY | December 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17535583 | CARBON-BASED ANODE MATERIAL HAVING SURFACE FORMED WITH SLIGHTLY OXIDIZED PORES, AND METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME | November 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 35 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17533725 | ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERY | November 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17613650 | NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY | November 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17298778 | CATHODE ADDITIVE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, CATHODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, COMPRISING SAME, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAME | November 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17511084 | COMPOSITE ELECTRODE FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERY | October 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17470180 | ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME | September 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17310690 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY | August 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17310671 | SLURRY COMPOSITION FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY FUNCTIONAL LAYER, SEPARATOR FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY, AND NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY | August 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17431216 | SULFUR-CARBON COMPOSITE, AND CATHODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY WHICH COMPRISE SAME | August 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17430804 | ANODE INCLUDING MULTIPLE CURRENT COLLECTORS JUXTAPOSED IN PARALLEL, AND SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAME | August 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17429152 | SEALING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SECONDARY BATTERY | August 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17418483 | ALL-SOLID BATTERY | June 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17340136 | BATTERY | June 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17297393 | POWER STORAGE MODULE | May 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD works in Art Unit 1752 and has examined 26 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 92.3%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 37 months.
Examiner COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD's allowance rate of 92.3% places them in the 78% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD receive 1.31 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD is 37 months. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +12.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD. This interview benefit is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 40.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 5% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 5% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.