USPTO Examiner CHUO TONY SHENG HSIANG - Art Unit 1751

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17139124POSITIVE ELECTRODE PIECE IN A BATTERY, ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE AND APPARATUSDecember 2020August 2023Allow3270NoNo
15733935SEAL STRUCTUREDecember 2020August 2023Abandon3310NoNo
15733933SEAL STRUCTUREDecember 2020July 2023Abandon3110NoNo
17106263SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING A WOUND ELECTRODE BODY WITH SPECIFIED FOIL BUNDLINGNovember 2020April 2025Allow5250NoNo
17089540MODULAR APPROACH FOR ADVANCED BATTERY MODULES HAVING DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICSNovember 2020October 2023Allow3511NoNo
17078934BATTERYOctober 2020March 2025Abandon5350NoNo
17012025PEO FILM, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND SOLID-STATE BATTERYSeptember 2020February 2024Allow4231NoNo
16969277NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING WINDING TYPE ELECTRODE BODY WITH TAPE ADHERED THEREONAugust 2020October 2023Abandon3820NoNo
16927274DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTING A CAVITY-FILLING COMPOUND IN A BATTERYJuly 2020July 2024Abandon4841NoNo
16959294Positive Electrode Having Improved Adhesion and Energy Density, and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the SameJune 2020September 2023Allow3820YesNo
16913132BATTERY CELL VENTING SYSTEM FOR ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE BATTERIESJune 2020March 2023Allow3320NoNo
16772060ELECTROLYTE COMPOSITION FOR A LITHIUM-ION ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLJune 2020April 2025Abandon5860NoNo
16853430LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING A HIGH NICKEL-BASED CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND A NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE CONTAINING A POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL-BASED POLYMERApril 2020November 2024Abandon5550NoNo
16842282SECONDARY BATTERY HAVING IMPROVED HIGH-TEMPERATURE PROPERTIESApril 2020December 2024Allow5650YesNo
16754276ELECTRODE COMPOSITION AND PREPARATION PROCESS FOR LITHIUM-ION BATTERY, ELECTRODE AND BATTERY INCORPORATING SAMEApril 2020November 2023Abandon4431NoNo
16824891NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE, NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ENERGY DEVICEMarch 2020May 2024Abandon5040NoNo
16644676Lithium Ion Secondary BatteryMarch 2020October 2023Allow4431NoNo
16805900ELECTROLYTE COMPOSITION FOR LITHIUM-ION ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLMarch 2020April 2024Abandon4950NoNo
16776163ELECTROLYTE FOR HIGH-ENERGY DENSITY, GRAPHITE-CONTAINING BATTERYJanuary 2020March 2023Abandon3820YesNo
16622513COMPOSITION AND POSITIVE-ELECTRODE BINDER COMPOSITIONDecember 2019May 2024Abandon5350NoNo
16704259BINDER SOLUTION FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY, ELECTRODE SLURRY FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY COMPRISING THE SAME AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY USING THE SAMEDecember 2019May 2024Abandon5341NoNo
16691970Laminated Lithium Metal Anode With Protective CoatingsNovember 2019April 2025Abandon6060YesYes
16659770SECONDARY BATTERYOctober 2019October 2023Abandon4840NoNo
16656190BATTERY MODULEOctober 2019June 2023Allow4440NoNo
16605334BATTERY CELL INCLUDING SEALING TAPE FOR ACCELERATING HEAT CONDUCTIONOctober 2019December 2023Allow5050YesYes
16535589SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY PACK, ELECTRIC VEHICLE, ELECTRIC TOOL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEAugust 2019June 2025Abandon6080YesNo
16465892THIN FILM, AND UNDERCOAT FOIL FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE ELECTRODEMay 2019April 2023Abandon4641NoNo
16465499NEGATIVE ELECTRODE WITH CARBON-BASED THIN FILM, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAMEMay 2019August 2023Allow5070YesNo
16078188Ceramic-and-Polymer-Compositely-Coated Lithium Ion Separator and Preparation Method ThereforMarch 2019July 2023Allow5951YesNo
16246896GRAPHENE/SILICON NANOWIRE HYBRID MATERIAL FOR A LITHIUM-ION BATTERYJanuary 2019October 2024Abandon6090NoNo
16222066COPPER FOIL FOR CURRENT COLLECTOR OF LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERYDecember 2018March 2024Allow6031NoYes
16188511REINFORCED BIPOLAR BATTERY ASSEMBLYNovember 2018June 2024Abandon6060NoYes
15774192ELECTRODE INCLUDING ELECTRODE CURRENT COLLECTOR WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL NETWORK STRUCTUREMay 2018June 2025Abandon6080YesYes
15868985BATTERY WITH DISPLAY FUNCTION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE CONTAINING THE SAMEJanuary 2018June 2023Abandon6070YesNo
15698695ELECTRODE AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE COMPRISING GRAPHENE COMPOUNDSeptember 2017July 2024Allow6081NoYes
14877089MATERIAL FOR USE IN A BATTERY AND A BATTERYOctober 2015May 2023Abandon6091YesNo
14870896WATER-ACTIVATED POWER BANK STRUCTURESeptember 2015July 2018Allow3410NoNo
14396696VEHICLE FUEL CELL APPARATUS WITH IMPROVED AIR INTAKEOctober 2014March 2017Allow2910NoNo
14079524ANNULAR DEVICE WITH BATTERY COVERNovember 2013February 2016Allow2700NoNo
14015292METHOD FOR PREPARING ELECTROLYTE FOR VANADIUM REDOX FLOW BATTERY USING VANADIUM OXIDEAugust 2013March 2016Allow3110NoNo
13925191HOLLOW PLATINUM NANOPARTICLES FOR FUEL CELLSJune 2013May 2017Allow4621YesNo
13872769MOLTEN SALT AND THERMAL BATTERYApril 2013December 2013Allow810NoNo
13850087SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELL SYSTEM RESPONSIVE TO EXPLOSIVE VAPORIZATION OF WATER IN REFORMER TO CONTROL POWERMarch 2013June 2016Allow3910NoNo
13848181BATTERY UNIT CONNECTION STRUCTURE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLEMarch 2013May 2016Allow3810NoNo
13556288UNIQUE BATTERY WITH A MULTI-FUNCTIONAL, PHYSICOCHEMICALLY ACTIVE MEMBRANE SEPARATOR/ELECTROLYTE-ELECTRODE MONOLITH AND A METHOD MAKING THE SAMEJuly 2012July 2013Allow1110NoNo
13536721SYMMETRIC BATTERY AND METHOD OF USEJune 2012June 2013Allow1211NoNo
13498422Solvent for Electrolyte Solution, Electrolyte Solution, and Gel-like ElectrolyteApril 2012June 2014Allow2700NoNo
13196474BATTERIES CONTAINING BISMUTH GLASS COMPOSITIONSAugust 2011May 2012Allow910YesNo
13053621PLATED PHOTOPOLYMER BASED FUEL CELLMarch 2011December 2013Allow3201NoNo
12957321RECHARGEABLE BATTERY PACK AND CONNECTION TAB USED FOR THE SAMENovember 2010April 2014Allow4121NoNo
12954020REPLACEMENT DEVICE FOR MEMBRANE-ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY OF FUEL CELL STACK WITH SEPARATORS HAVING RECESS PORTIONSNovember 2010October 2013Allow3411NoNo
12889420ANNUAL DEVICE WITH BATTERY COVERSeptember 2010September 2013Allow3611NoNo
12814821Prismatic Storage Battery Or Cell With Flexible Recessed PortionJune 2010September 2015Allow6041YesNo
12755624FUEL CELL STACK AND FUEL CELL SYSTEM WITH PLURALITY OF GENERATION MODULESApril 2010January 2015Allow5751NoNo
12702403METHOD FOR PROVIDING AN ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL HAVING A POCKET SEPERATOR DESIGNFebruary 2010November 2010Allow910NoNo
12700616SECONDARY BATTERY HAVING A SHORT INDUCTION PLATEFebruary 2010February 2014Allow4840NoNo
12598325DEVICE FOR STACKING SUCCESSIVE SEPARATOR AND SHEET ELECTRODEOctober 2009August 2013Allow4621NoNo
12532616FUEL CELL SYSTEM WITH ROTATION MECHANISMSeptember 2009July 2013Allow4620NoNo
12409999LAMINATE TYPE BATTERY AND BATTERY MODULE INCORPORATING THE LAMINATE TYPE BATTERYMarch 2009August 2012Allow4121NoNo
12240725Sulfur Tolerant Anode For Solid Oxide Fuel CellSeptember 2008January 2017Allow6051NoYes
12096414FUEL CELL SYSTEM HAVING DECREASED DETERIORATION DURING INITIATIONSeptember 2008December 2013Allow6041YesNo
12203616ELECTRIC SYSTEM FOR FUEL CELL, FUEL CELL VEHICLE, AND METHOD OF SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWERSeptember 2008July 2012Allow4731YesNo
12203688FUEL CELL VEHICLE, AND METHOD OF SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWERSeptember 2008September 2012Allow4941YesNo
12196519NIOBIUM OXIDE-CONTAINING ELECTRODE AND LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAMEAugust 2008November 2012Allow5120NoNo
12118483POLYMERS OBTAINED FROM MONOMERS ALLOWING A SEQUENTIAL POLYMERIZATION, AND THEIR USE FOR PREPARING IONIC CONDUCTORSMay 2008April 2013Allow5940NoNo
11791521NICKEL METAL HYDRIDE RECHARGEABLE BATTERY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING NEGATIVE ELECTRODE THEREOFMarch 2008November 2012Allow6021YesYes
11939721UNIQUE BATTERY WITH A MULTI-FUNCTIONAL, PHYSICOCHEMICALLY ACTIVE MEMBRANE SEPARATOR/ELECTROLYTE-ELECTRODE MONOLITH AND A METHOD MAKING THE SAMENovember 2007April 2012Allow5310NoNo
11919716FUEL CELL SYSTEM HAVING HEAT EXCHANGER AND PRELIMINARY REFORMER AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE FUEL CELL SYSTEMOctober 2007March 2014Allow6060YesNo
11869915COIN-TYPE NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERYOctober 2007March 2012Allow5420NoNo
11882111ELECTRIC POWER SOURCE PROVIDING A BATTERY CASE WITH AN INTERMEDIARY DUCTJuly 2007June 2011Allow4611NoNo
11752613FUEL CELL SYSTEM INCLUDING CHARGE STAUS DETECTOR AND OPERATION METHOD THEREFORMay 2007June 2013Allow6050YesNo
11690413UNIQUE BATTERY WITH AN ACTIVE MEMBRANE SEPARATOR HAVING UNIFORM PHYSICO-CHEMICALLY FUNCTIONALIZED ION CHANNELS AND A METHOD MAKING THE SAMEMarch 2007December 2011Allow5730NoNo
11723436ELECTRODE STRUCTURE FOR POLYMER ELECTROLYTE FUEL CELL COMPRISING SULFONATED POLYARYLENE-BASED POLYMER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTUING SAMEMarch 2007October 2011Allow5530NoNo
11723174HIGH VOLTAGE METHANOL FUEL CELL ASSEMBLY USING PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANES AND BASE/ACID ELECTROLYTESMarch 2007May 2011Allow5020YesNo
11671210SELF-REGULATING CONTROL OF PARASITIC LOADS IN A FUEL CELL POWER SYSTEMFebruary 2007November 2010Allow4511YesNo
11508148MEMBRANE ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY FOR FUEL CELLAugust 2006December 2012Allow6021NoYes
11480617FUEL CELL STACK WITH HEAT SINK ELEMENTJuly 2006March 2011Allow5640NoNo
10583413FUEL CELL SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF FOR DETECTING A CHEMICAL SHORTJune 2006May 2011Allow5940YesNo
10953778INTEGRATED CURRENT SENSORS FOR A FUEL CELL STACKSeptember 2004July 2012Allow6060NoYes
10943688FLUID CONSUMING BATTERY WITH FLUID REGULATING SYSTEMSeptember 2004November 2011Allow6020NoYes
10664818ENHANCED FUEL DELIVERY FOR DIRECT METHANOL FUEL CELLSSeptember 2003March 2011Allow6060NoYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
7
Examiner Affirmed
3
(42.9%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(57.1%)
Reversal Percentile
81.9%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 57.1% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
15
Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(40.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
9
(60.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
65.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 40.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG works in Art Unit 1751 and has examined 81 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 72.8%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 49 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG's allowance rate of 72.8% places them in the 38% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG receive 3.40 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 90% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG is 49 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +1.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG. This interview benefit is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 21.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 58.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 44.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 4.9% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.4% of allowed cases (in the 77% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.