Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19174132 | Lithium Secondary Battery, Battery Module and Battery Pack | April 2025 | December 2025 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18415666 | ANODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME | January 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 19 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18544234 | LITHIUM-SULFUR BATTERY | December 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18229940 | Lithium Secondary Battery, Battery Module and Battery Pack | August 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 27 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18259511 | LITHIUM METAL COMPOSITE OXIDE, POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, POSITIVE ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY | June 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18265599 | A POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18006148 | DISPERSANT COMPOSITION FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE, CONDUCTIVE MATERIAL DISPERSION LIQUID FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE, SLURRY COMPOSITION FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE ELECTRODE AND METHOD OF PRODUCING SAME, ELECTRODE FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE, AND ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE | January 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17854291 | BATTERY, ELECTRICAL APPARATUS, AND PREPARATION METHOD OF BATTERY | June 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17691681 | ZERO TRANSITION ELECTRODE COATING | March 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17536102 | NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION OF LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY, AND LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY | November 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17535938 | ANODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME | November 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 49 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17456589 | LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY | November 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17535680 | LITHIUM-CONTAINING SILICON OXIDE COMPOSITE ANODE MATERIAL, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME, AND LITHIUM ION BATTERY | November 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17532704 | ALL SOLID STATE BATTERY | November 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17528392 | COMPOSITE FOAM AS SOLID-ELECTROLYTE INTERFACE FOR SOLID-STATE BATTERIES | November 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17454205 | ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME | November 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17518077 | ALL-SOLID BATTERY | November 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17452477 | NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL FOR SECONDARY BATTERY | October 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17510582 | NEGATIVE ELECTRODE WITH GRADIENT STRUCTURE | October 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17509688 | MULTILAYER ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF | October 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17601175 | LAYER SYSTEM, BIPOLAR PLATE COMPRISING SUCH A LAYER SYSTEM, AND FUEL CELL PRODUCED THEREWITH | October 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17601306 | POLYMORPHIC LITHIUM-SILICON COMPOUND FOR USE IN PURE SILICON ANODE OF LITHIUM-ION BATTERY AND USE THEREOF | October 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17485261 | EXTINGUISHING BATTERY THERMAL RUNAWAY | September 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17442520 | CATHODE MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF AND SECONDARY LITHIUM BATTERY | September 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 17447305 | SOLID ELECTROLYTE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SOLID ELECTROLYTE | September 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17411504 | Solid Electrolyte, Method for Producing Solid Electrolyte, and Composite | August 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17366527 | MOTOR VEHICLE | July 2021 | February 2026 | Allow | 55 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17350775 | Electric Work Vehicle | June 2021 | March 2026 | Abandon | 57 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17415078 | ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR | June 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 16971180 | METHOD FOR PREPROCESSING LITHIUM METAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY | August 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner RUGGIERO, OLIVIA MASON works in Art Unit 1729 and has examined 21 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 66.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.
Examiner RUGGIERO, OLIVIA MASON's allowance rate of 66.7% places them in the 27% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by RUGGIERO, OLIVIA MASON receive 2.14 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 58% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RUGGIERO, OLIVIA MASON is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 16% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +28.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RUGGIERO, OLIVIA MASON. This interview benefit is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 18.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 22.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 5% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 5% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.