USPTO Examiner MARTIN MATTHEW T - Art Unit 1728

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18612233POWER STORAGE CELLMarch 2024June 2025Allow1510NoNo
17123043BATTERY DEVICE WITH PRESSURE RELIEF VALVEDecember 2020August 2023Abandon3210NoNo
17053964Vehicle with a High-Voltage AccumulatorNovember 2020March 2024Abandon4020NoYes
17087575POROUS TWO-WAFER BATTERYNovember 2020June 2023Abandon3110NoNo
17031667Portable Sun Tracking SystemSeptember 2020October 2021Allow1210NoNo
16968776PORTABLE SYSTEM OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS WITH BIAXIAL SOLAR TRACKING STRUCTUREAugust 2020July 2021Allow1110NoNo
16959932BATTERY ASSEMBLY AND ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICEJuly 2020November 2023Abandon4120YesNo
16897755ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERIES AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAMEJune 2020August 2023Abandon3820NoNo
16764010BATTERY PACK FOR A HAND-HELD POWER TOOLMay 2020April 2025Abandon5920NoYes
16857830Thermoelectric ModuleApril 2020August 2021Allow1610NoNo
16819803CATHODE MIXTURE, ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY, AND METHOD OF PRODUCING CATHODE MIXTUREMarch 2020December 2023Abandon4520NoNo
16635400METHOD FOR PRODUCING SOLID ELECTROLYTE AND ELECTRODE FOR ALL-SOLID STATE BATTERIESJanuary 2020June 2023Abandon4030YesNo
16685263FULLERENE DERIVATIVES, AND ORGANIC PHOTOELECTRIC DEVICE, IMAGE SENSOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAMENovember 2019October 2021Allow2321YesNo
16610358SOLAR PV GENERATOR WITH DISH REFLECTOR AND FLY'S EYE RECEIVERNovember 2019July 2021Allow2111NoNo
16578872METHODS OF MAKING SULFIDE-IMPREGNATED SOLID-STATE BATTERYSeptember 2019September 2021Allow2411NoNo
16476491Battery Module with Improved Connection Structure Between Electrode Leads and Method for Manufacturing the SameJuly 2019August 2021Allow2511YesNo
16413352Method for hanging PV modulesMay 2019September 2021Allow2810YesNo
16363792RECHARGEABLE BATTERY HAVING A WALL ELEMENT AND WALL ELEMENT THEREFORMarch 2019July 2021Allow2810YesNo
16282700ELECTRODE MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEFebruary 2019July 2021Allow2931YesNo
16280404FUEL CELL SYSTEMFebruary 2019August 2021Allow2920YesNo
16250440EFFICIENT SOLAR CELLS VIA SULFUR-FUSED HELICAL PERYLENE DIIMIDES DESIGN CONCEPTJanuary 2019September 2021Allow3210NoNo
16085102FLOW BATTERY CONTROL METHOD, FLOW BATTERY CONTROL SYSTEM AND FLOW BATTERYJanuary 2019July 2021Allow3411NoNo
16082028NOVEL COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR AND USE THEREOFSeptember 2018July 2021Allow3510YesNo
13003615PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION DEVICEJanuary 2011July 2013Allow3120NoNo
12910093SOLAR CELLOctober 2010June 2012Allow2000NoNo
12711694DYE-SENSITIZED SOLAR CELLFebruary 2010July 2012Abandon2910NoNo
12691593SOLAR CELLJanuary 2010May 2012Allow2820NoNo
12669235Solar cell and method for the sameJanuary 2010June 2011Abandon1610NoNo
12643565NANOSTRUCTURED LAYER AND FABRICATION METHODSDecember 2009May 2012Allow2820YesNo
12626778TRUNCATED PYRAMID STRUCTURES FOR SEE-THROUGH SOLAR CELLSNovember 2009July 2011Allow1920NoNo
12582037SOLAR CELL AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAMEOctober 2009October 2012Allow3611NoNo
12579487VEHICLE-BASED SOLAR CONCENTRATOROctober 2009September 2012Abandon3510NoNo
12584252Integrated battery management system for vehiclesSeptember 2009August 2012Abandon3520NoNo
12541981NANOWIRE THERMOELECTRIC DEVICEAugust 2009June 2012Allow3410YesNo
12540463INTERMETAL STACK FOR USE IN A PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVICEAugust 2009September 2012Allow3711NoNo
12540560FOLDABLE SOLAR ENERGY APPARATUSAugust 2009July 2012Abandon3601NoNo
12537817PORTABLE SOLAR POWER SOURCEAugust 2009January 2012Abandon3010NoNo
12382669Photovoltaic module with heaterMarch 2009February 2012Abandon3510NoNo
12407780CIGS Solar Cell Structure And Method For Fabricating The SameMarch 2009September 2011Abandon3011NoNo
12407497COMPOUND OR ORGANIC THIN-FILM PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL, COMPOUND OR ORGANIC THIN-FILM PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING COMPOUND OR ORGANIC THIN-FILM PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLMarch 2009June 2012Abandon3920NoNo
12407178CIGS SOLAR CELL HAVING THERMAL EXPANSION BUFFER LAYER AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAMEMarch 2009October 2011Abandon3111NoNo
12406623AFFIXING METHOD AND SOLAR DECAL DEVICE USING A THIN FILM PHOTOVOLTAICMarch 2009February 2012Allow3501NoNo
12405962SINGLE HETEROJUNCTION BACK CONTACT SOLAR CELLMarch 2009June 2012Allow3920NoNo
12253630PHOTOACTIVE DEVICE WITH ORGANIC LAYERSOctober 2008August 2012Abandon4610NoNo
12246172HYBRID SOLAR PANELOctober 2008March 2012Abandon4220NoNo
12285261TCO-BASED HYBRID SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY CONVERSION APPARATUSOctober 2008July 2012Allow4620NoNo
12090090Structure With Profiled Surface for Variable Visual EffectsSeptember 2008February 2012Abandon4601NoNo
12162727SOLAR CELL AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAMEAugust 2008January 2012Abandon4210NoNo
12222102Light collection deviceAugust 2008February 2011Abandon3110NoNo
12184609ORGANIC SOLAR CELL USING CONDUCTIVE POLYMER TRANSPARENT ELECTRODE AND FABRICATING METHOD THEREOFAugust 2008July 2011Abandon3620NoNo
12183253GEODESIC DOME PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL POWER SYSTEMJuly 2008January 2012Abandon4110NoNo
12219654SOLAR CELL AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAMEJuly 2008April 2011Allow3311NoNo
12162260SOLAR CELL AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAMEJuly 2008July 2011Abandon3520NoNo
12179567APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR LEVITATING A PORTABLE SOLAR ARRAYJuly 2008November 2010Abandon2710NoNo
12177874Clips for Aligning Optical Components in a Solar Concentrating ArrayJuly 2008November 2011Abandon4001NoNo
12171653PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL AND PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL SUBSTRATEJuly 2008June 2011Abandon3511NoNo
12171579METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE OXIDE COATINGJuly 2008February 2012Abandon4321NoNo
12171617PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL AND PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL SUBSTRATEJuly 2008June 2011Abandon3511NoNo
12170423SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FORMING SOLAR CELL STRUCTURESJuly 2008May 2012Allow4631YesYes
12169374PHOTOVOLTAIC APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEJuly 2008August 2012Allow5030NoYes
12213724Solar beadsJune 2008January 2011Abandon3010NoNo
12138179METHOD FOR FABRICATING A SILICON SOLAR CELL STRUCTURE HAVING A GALLIUM DOPED P-SILICON SUBSTRATEJune 2008February 2011Abandon3210NoNo
12138140METHOD FOR FABRICATING A SILICON SOLAR CELL STRUCTURE HAVING SILICON NITRIDE LAYERSJune 2008February 2011Abandon3210NoNo
11913310Energy generating device and methodMay 2008September 2011Abandon4611NoNo
12094498Solar System and Method for the Operation ThereofMay 2008June 2011Abandon3711NoNo
12103409APPARATUS FOR GENERATING AC ELECTRIC POWER FROM PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLSApril 2008October 2010Abandon3010NoNo
12060012SOLAR CELL WITH COLORIZATION LAYERMarch 2008May 2011Abandon3710NoNo
12055305BACK CONTACT MODULE FOR SOLAR CELLMarch 2008April 2011Abandon3711NoNo
12076458Key module with energy storage functionMarch 2008December 2010Abandon3210NoNo
12073078Solar cell having spherical surface and method of manufacturing the sameFebruary 2008June 2011Abandon4021NoNo
11991141SILICON-BASED THIN-FILM PHOTOECLECTRIC CONVERTER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEFebruary 2008January 2011Allow3620NoNo
12070791Pre-fabricated roof-mount sun-track PV carouselFebruary 2008March 2013Allow6020YesNo
12032769THERMOELECTRIC POWER GENERATION METHOD AND APPARATUSFebruary 2008August 2013Allow6030NoYes
12070072GLASS-CERAMIC THERMOELECTRIC MODULEFebruary 2008June 2011Allow4030NoNo
11964218METHOD FOR FORMING PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION SUBSTRATEDecember 2007May 2012Abandon5311NoNo
11959309METHOD OR MEANS TO USE OR COMBINE PLASMONIC, THERMAL, PHOTOVOLTAIC OR OPTICAL ENGINEERINGDecember 2007July 2011Abandon4220NoNo
11956950SOLAR CELL SYSTEMS FOR USE IN BUILDINGSDecember 2007January 2011Abandon3711NoNo
11954219MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING SYSTEM FOR THE SOLAR-SUPERCAPACITOR POWER DEVICE AND METHOD USING SAMEDecember 2007January 2011Abandon3710NoNo
11953027SOLAR ENERGY DEVICE FOR ELECTRICITY AND HEATINGDecember 2007January 2013Allow6030NoYes
11935753Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell and Method of Manufacturing the SameNovember 2007July 2011Abandon4430NoNo
11667101METHODS OF MAKING FUNCTIONALIZED NANORODSOctober 2007August 2011Allow5220NoNo
11758348LIGHT-HARVESTING ANTENNAE FOR ORGANIC SOLAR CELLSJune 2007March 2011Abandon4620NoNo
11751674DYE-SENSITIZED SOLAR CELL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEMay 2007December 2010Abandon4220NoNo
11751524PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL WITH SHALLOW EMITTERMay 2007June 2011Abandon4921NoNo
11746697WATER INTEGRATED PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMMay 2007January 2011Abandon4420NoNo
11799940Monolithic integration of nonplanar solar cellsMay 2007October 2011Abandon5321NoNo
11718434CHALCOPYRITE TYPE SOLAR CELLMay 2007February 2011Allow4530NoNo
11734126Tandem Photovoltaic CellsApril 2007December 2010Abandon4411NoNo
11664529Photoelectric ConverterApril 2007December 2010Abandon4420NoNo
11578359Light-Assisted Electrochemical Shunt Passivation for Photovoltaic DevicesMarch 2007February 2012Abandon6020YesNo
11688008COMPACT SOLAR APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING ELECTRICITY AND METHOD OF PRODUCING ELECTRICITY USING A COMPACT SOLAR APPARATUSMarch 2007December 2010Allow4520YesNo
11631610PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR CELL AND SOLAR MODULEMarch 2007March 2011Allow5040YesNo
11682319THIN FILM SOLAR CELL MODULE OF SEE-THROUGH TYPEMarch 2007September 2012Abandon6041NoNo
11679756THERMOELECTRIC MODULEFebruary 2007January 2011Allow4720NoNo
11573789Thermo-Electric Cooling DeviceFebruary 2007September 2012Abandon6030NoNo
11705770PHOTOVOLTAIC APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEFebruary 2007February 2012Allow6031YesNo
11700324Combined thermal diodic and thermoenergy devices and methods for manufacturing sameJanuary 2007August 2011Abandon5521NoNo
11571430Thermoelectric conversion material and process for producing the sameDecember 2006January 2011Abandon4821NoNo
11563443METHODS OF FORMING EMBEDDED THERMOELECTRIC COOLERS WITH ADJACENT THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE FIELDSNovember 2006August 2011Allow5650NoNo
11581769Semiconductor structure and process for forming ohmic connections to a semiconductor structureOctober 2006May 2011Abandon6021NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MARTIN, MATTHEW T.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
2
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
69.8%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
7
Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(57.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(42.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
86.2%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 57.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner MARTIN, MATTHEW T - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MARTIN, MATTHEW T works in Art Unit 1728 and has examined 111 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 41.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MARTIN, MATTHEW T's allowance rate of 41.4% places them in the 4% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MARTIN, MATTHEW T receive 1.82 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 56% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MARTIN, MATTHEW T is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +53.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MARTIN, MATTHEW T. This interview benefit is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 24.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 55.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 22.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.6% of allowed cases (in the 85% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 13.0% of allowed cases (in the 90% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.