Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18870387 | Composite Sodium Ferrous Sulfate Cathode Material, and Preparation Method and Application Thereof | November 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18657806 | SEPARATOR AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, BATTERY, AND ELECTRIC APPARATUS | May 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18583541 | ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND SECONDARY BATTERY | February 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18065616 | POSITIVE ELECTRODE PIECE AND SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING SAME | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17989752 | Carbon Nanotube Dispersion Paste, Method for Manufacturing Carbon Nanotube Dispersion Paste, Quality Control Method for Carbon Nanotube Dispersion Paste, Composite Material Paste, Electrode for Lithium-Ion Battery Positive Electrode, and Lithium-Ion Battery | November 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17973865 | NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL, AND NEGATIVE ELECTRODE PLATE, ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING SAME | October 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17943689 | ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND SECONDARY BATTERY | September 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17941197 | CELL CONNECTOR FOR AN ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE, AND ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE | September 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17942051 | NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE RECHARGEABLE BATTERY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE RECHARGEABLE BATTERY | September 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17939142 | NEGATIVE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND RECHARGEABLE LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING SAME | September 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17896110 | TEMPERATURE RAISING SYSTEM | August 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17893856 | ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING SAME | August 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17797057 | CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR PREPARING METAL ELECTRODES | August 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17860365 | BATTERY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THEREOF | July 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17858979 | HIGH-ENTROPY TRANSITION METAL LAYERED OXIDES, POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL, AND SODIUM ION BATTERY | July 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17844359 | BATTERY RACK | June 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17713973 | CATHODE COATED WITH CATALYSTS AND HYBRID ELECTROLYTES FOR HIGH-ENERGY DENSITY LITHIUM-SULFUR (Li-S) BATTERIES | April 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17709782 | POSITIVE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME | March 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17708713 | ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17706754 | METHOD OF MAKING COMPOSITE POLYMER ELECTROLYTE FOR ALL SOLID-STATE LITHIUM-ION BATTERY | March 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17702154 | DRY PROCESS FOR FORMING AN ELECTRODE | March 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17570080 | COMPLIANT RODS FOR FUEL CELL | January 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17551395 | RECOVERY OF MATERIALS FROM SPENT BATTERIES USING A GREEN SOLVENT | December 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T works in Art Unit 1727 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.
Examiner LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 16% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 4% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 5% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.