Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18649960 | HYDROPHILIC POLYMER, METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY CONTAINING THE HYDROPHILIC POLYMER | April 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18568706 | ACTIVE MATERIAL AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING THE SAME | December 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17921490 | Battery Housing With Valve Device, Battery and Motor Vehicle | October 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17896610 | SOLID-STATE ELECTROLYTE FILM AND SOLID-STATE BATTERY | August 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17888497 | SILICON CARBON NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL, NEGATIVE ELECTRODE SHEET, SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK AND POWER CONSUMPTION APPARATUS | August 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17798749 | COOLANT PORT ASSEMBLY | August 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17849992 | RECYCLING ALL SOLID-STATE BATTERIES (ASSBs) AND ANODE RECOVERY | June 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17785308 | Housing Cover for a Battery Housing With Particle Protection and Heat Protection, Battery Housing, Traction Battery and Motor Vehicle | June 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17778915 | CURRENT COLLECTING PLATE AND CYLINDRICAL LITHIUM BATTERY | May 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17730512 | COOLING SYSTEM OF POWER STORAGE DEVICE | April 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17730538 | BATTERY PACK APPARATUS | April 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17707037 | BATTERY COOLING DEVICE | March 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17763102 | SECONDARY BATTERY | March 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17697490 | VEHICULAR BATTERY CASE | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17686505 | LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY | March 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17679014 | ELECTROCHEMICAL REDUCTION OF HALOGENATED COMPOUNDS COMPRISING A HALOALKANE | February 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17043844 | CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME | October 2020 | June 2025 | Allow | 56 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner VAN KIRK, DUSTIN KENWOOD works in Art Unit 1722 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 56 months.
Examiner VAN KIRK, DUSTIN KENWOOD's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by VAN KIRK, DUSTIN KENWOOD receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by VAN KIRK, DUSTIN KENWOOD is 56 months. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 4% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 4% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.