USPTO Examiner RODRIGUEZ MICHAEL P - Art Unit 1712

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18929027METHOD FOR RESTORATION PERFORMANCES OF AGED NICKEL-RICH NMC CATHODE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM-ION SECONDARY BATTERYOctober 2024October 2025Allow1200NoNo
18913040FILM-FORMING METHOD AND FILM-FORMING APPARATUSOctober 2024January 2026Allow1510NoNo
18913070SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHODOctober 2024October 2025Allow1200NoNo
18779178METHODS FOR COLD SPRAYING NICKEL PARTICLES ON A SUBSTRATEJuly 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
18755271FUNCTION SCREEN PRINTING ON UPPERJune 2024January 2026Allow1910NoNo
18718558SLOT-TYPE SPRAY NOZZLE, COATING DEVICE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF FILM-COATED MEMBERJune 2024October 2025Allow1600NoNo
18712370A METHOD FOR PREPARING A VETERINARY MEDICAMENT DOSAGE WITH INKS AND A VETERINARY MEDICAMENT DOSAGE OBTAINABLE BY THE METHODMay 2024January 2026Allow2010NoNo
18649735METHOD OF APPLYING A COATING COMPOSITION TO A SUBSTRATE UTILIZING A HIGH TRANSFER EFFICIENCY APPLICATORApril 2024October 2025Allow1810YesNo
18631878ANTI-FOULING AND ANTI-CORROSION PROTECTIVE COATING METHODApril 2024October 2025Allow1810NoNo
18610530STRUCTURAL MEMBERMarch 2024January 2026Allow2220NoNo
18423957VARNISH IMPREGNATION DEVICE OF STATOR COIL WINDINGJanuary 2024January 2026Allow2410NoNo
18423896VARNISH IMPREGNATION METHOD OF STATOR COIL WINDINGJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2310YesNo
18423684METHOD OF MAKING STAINLESS STEEL REFRIGERATION APPLIANCE AND PAINTED STAINLESS STEEL REFRIGERATION APPLIANCEJanuary 2024January 2026Allow2411NoNo
18422103ELECTRODE LAYER COMPOSITION, PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF AND MEMBRANE ELECTRODE ASSEMBLYJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2210NoNo
18412065METALIZED FABRIC THAT DISSIPATES AND SCATTERS INFRARED LIGHT AND METHODS OR MAKING AND USING THE SAMEJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2420NoNo
18573597LAMINATE, PACKAGING MATERIAL, AND PACKAGING BODYDecember 2023January 2026Allow2510NoNo
18542444SYSTEM FOR DETECTING DEGRADATION OF PAINT AUTONOMOUSLY APPLIED TO A BUILDINGDecember 2023March 2026Abandon2710YesNo
18570014METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING STEAM OXIDATION RESISTANCE OF SMALL DIAMETER BOILER TUBE IN COAL-FIRED BOILERDecember 2023December 2025Allow2410NoNo
18526199PROCESS FOR MAKING A NON-FIBROUS WATER SOLUBLE PRODUCTDecember 2023January 2026Allow2620YesNo
18514787DEPOSITION OF SEALANT OR SIMILAR MATERIALSNovember 2023January 2026Allow2611YesNo
18389209FUNCTIONALIZED ORGANOTIN PRECURSORS AND RELATED METHODSNovember 2023March 2026Allow2821NoNo
18483200METHOD OF DEPOSITING A TRANSITION METAL DICHALCOGENIDEOctober 2023January 2026Allow2710NoNo
18367839ADJUSTABLE MULTIPLE FILAMENT ION BEAM DEPOSITION SYSTEMSeptember 2023October 2025Allow2511NoNo
18340535SUBSTRATE TREATING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUSJune 2023January 2026Allow3120YesNo
18198993ADHESIVE APPLICATION DEVICE AND METHOD OF APPLYING ADHESIVEMay 2023December 2025Allow3111NoNo
18130111COATED FLUID HANDLING COMPONENTS AND METHODS FOR PROTECTING AND EXTENDING THE SERVICE LIFE OF FLUID HANDLING COMPONENTSApril 2023January 2026Allow3320NoNo
18093081System and Method for Manufacture of Abrasive CoatingJanuary 2023January 2026Allow3620NoNo
18147686MIXED VALENCE SOL-GELS FOR HIGH REFRACTIVE INDEX, TRANSPARENT OPTICAL COATINGSDecember 2022March 2026Allow3911NoNo
17999062A PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PACKAGING MATERIALNovember 2022March 2026Allow3921NoNo
17999026CHEMICAL SOLUTION SPRAYING METHODNovember 2022November 2025Allow3620YesNo
17743922SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO REDUCE FLOW ACCURACY ERROR FOR LIQUID & GAS MASS FLOW CONTROLLER DEVICESMay 2022October 2025Allow4111YesNo
17734784PLANT BASED ANTI-MICROBIAL FABRIC TREATMENT, TREATED FABRICS, AND ASSOCIATED METHODSMay 2022July 2024Allow2731NoNo
17377424PREPARATION METHOD OF MATERIAL FOR PUNCTURE-RESISTANT ARTIFICIAL BLOOD VESSEL AND ARTIFICIAL BLOOD VESSEL PREPARED THEREBYJuly 2021October 2025Allow5111NoNo
16967004AQUEOUS SUSPENSION CONTAINING METAL CARBIDE PARTICLESAugust 2020January 2026Allow6051YesNo
16696490ROBOTIC DEVICENovember 2019March 2021Allow1600NoNo
16230165METHODS FOR PRINTING ON GLASSDecember 2018November 2020Allow2310NoNo
16224743SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING COATING OPERATIONSDecember 2018February 2021Allow2640YesNo
16072059USE OF LOW-MOLECULAR CARBOXYLIC ACIDS IN AQUEOUS BASE COATSJuly 2018June 2021Allow3410YesNo
16029874LIQUID RESIN MODIFICATION FOR VOLUMETRIC SUPERHYDROPHOBIC 3D PRINTINGJuly 2018March 2019Allow800YesNo
16017192KEYCAP FORMING METHODJune 2018January 2021Allow3110NoNo
15968586WET WIPES COMPRISING ANTIMICROBIAL COATING COMPOSITIONSMay 2018July 2021Allow3811NoNo
15960844PARTIAL SPRAY REFURBISHMENT OF SPUTTERING TARGETSApril 2018June 2019Allow1410NoNo
15880661Article with Aesthetic SubstrateJanuary 2018June 2020Allow2911NoNo
15792836PAPER WEB HAVING A SURFACE THAT INCLUDES A PLURALITY OF SECTIONS, AT LEAST ONE OF THE SECTIONS HAVING A PLURALITY OF POSITIONS, WITH INK APPLIED TO THE PAPER WEB SURFACE AT SOME OF THE PLURALITY OF POSITIONSOctober 2017July 2019Allow2030NoNo
15659918METHODS FOR PRINTING INK ON PRE-TREATED GLASS SUBSTRATESJuly 2017November 2018Allow1510NoNo
15126655TREATED ARTICLE AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAMESeptember 2016January 2020Allow4030NoYes
15242102CALIBRATION AND ALIGNMENT OF 3D PRINTING DEPOSITION HEADSAugust 2016June 2019Allow3411YesNo
15090885ELECTROSTATIC POWDER COATING METHOD AND POWDER COATING MATERIALApril 2016September 2018Allow2920YesNo
14888485METHOD FOR COATING A PUMP COMPONENTNovember 2015June 2017Allow2010YesNo
14888407METHOD OF PRODUCING AN ELECTROSTATIC INK COMPOSITIONOctober 2015July 2017Allow2010NoNo
14842718THERMALLY AND ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE STRUCTURE, METHOD OF APPLYING A CARBON COATING TO SAME, AND METHOD OF REDUCING A CONTACT RESISTANCE OF SAMESeptember 2015February 2017Allow1710NoNo
14423957METHOD FOR FORMING A FILM OF PARTICLES ON A CARRIER LIQUID, WITH MOVEMENT OF AN INCLINED RAMP FOR COMPRESSING THE PARTICLESFebruary 2015April 2017Allow2611YesNo
14531383NON-FOULING, ANTI-MICROBIAL, ANTI-THROMBOGENIC GRAFT-FROM COMPOSITIONSNovember 2014February 2018Allow4011NoNo
14460518METHOD FOR SPRAY COATING A MATERIAL HANDLING SURFACEAugust 2014January 2017Allow2930YesNo
14450093IMAGE RECORDING METHODAugust 2014February 2016Allow1810NoNo
14372040DEVICE FOR APPLYING A FOAMING REACTION MIXTUREJuly 2014April 2017Allow3321NoNo
14372039DEVICE FOR APPLYING A FOAMING REACTION MIXTUREJuly 2014April 2017Allow3321YesNo
14363477METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SLIDING BEARING COMPRISING A CUNI2SI, CUFE2P OR CUSNX COMPOUNDJune 2014January 2021Allow6081NoNo
13959118Color Fan Deck With Paper Blades Painted On Both SidesAugust 2013March 2016Allow3111YesNo
13886338PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING A WATERPROOFING MEMBRANEMay 2013June 2016Allow3740YesYes
13448325Composition and Method to Form a Self Decontaminating SurfaceApril 2012July 2017Allow6071YesNo
13416449METHOD FOR DISPENSING FOAM ONTO SUBSTRATES OF LARGE WIDTHMarch 2012April 2013Allow1310YesNo
13364739COATING APPARATUS, COATING METHOD AND COATING-FILM FORMING APPARATUSFebruary 2012February 2013Allow1210NoNo
13257829EXTRUSION-COATED STRIP FOR RIGID PACKAGINGSDecember 2011May 2019Allow6041YesYes
13127683HETEROBIFUNCTIONAL POLYMERS AND METHODS FOR LAYER-BY-LAYER CONSTRUCTION OF MULTILAYER FILMSSeptember 2011December 2014Allow4321NoNo
13120292METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MASK HAVING SUBMILLIMETRIC APERTURES FOR A SUBMILLIMETRIC ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE GRID, AND MASK AND SUBMILLIMETRIC ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE GRIDJune 2011November 2013Allow3220NoNo
13120265METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MASK HAVING SUBMILLIMETRIC APERTURES FOR A SUBMILLIMETRIC ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE GRID, MASK HAVING SUBMILLIMETRIC APERTURES AND SUBMILLIMETRIC ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE GRIDJune 2011April 2015Allow4911NoNo
13127932METHODS FOR APPLYING POLYMER-MODIFIED WET CONCRETE MIXTURESMay 2011July 2015Allow6030YesNo
13057039METHOD FOR USING A SUPER-SLIPPERY THIN LAYER CHARACTERISED BY THE METHOD FOR MAKING SAMEApril 2011December 2013Allow3420YesNo
13056886LACQUER PATTERN PRODUCTION METHOD, LACQUER PATTERN FORMED BY USING THE METHOD, AND LACQUER PATTERN DISPLAY METHODMarch 2011December 2014Allow4611YesNo
12664092PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SELF-SEALING PNEUMATIC TIRE AND APPARATUS THEREFORDecember 2009April 2012Allow2800YesNo
12431477CONFIGURABLE APPLICATION OF A TIRE DRESSINGApril 2009December 2012Allow4421NoNo
12427259CONDUCTIVE POLISHING PAD AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAMEApril 2009September 2012Allow4121NoNo
12397894Method and Apparatus for Producing Ultra-Thin Graphitic LayersMarch 2009March 2013Allow4920YesNo
12253962SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROTECTING ENCLOSURE FROM SOLAR RADIATIONOctober 2008November 2012Allow4920YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
91.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
91.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 66.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P works in Art Unit 1712 and has examined 43 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P receive 1.95 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 48% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 46% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P. This interview benefit is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 22.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 66.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 4% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 9.3% of allowed cases (in the 88% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.