USPTO Examiner PROCTOR CACHET I - Art Unit 1712

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18870146AMORPHOUS ALLOY REINFORCED CU-BASED COMPOSITE COATING AND COMPOSITE BULK MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOFNovember 2024December 2025Allow1310NoNo
18833197PLASMA IRRADIATION APPARATUS AND PLASMA-TREATED LIQUID PRODUCTION METHODJuly 2024December 2025Allow1710NoNo
18782180DECORATIVE RADOME AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAMEJuly 2024January 2026Allow1810YesNo
18729469GRAPHENE COPPER COMPOSITE MATERIAL PREPARATION METHOD BASED ON COMBINATION OF HOT PRESSING SINTERING AND CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITIONJuly 2024March 2026Allow2020NoNo
18774128MEDICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS WITH NON-COATED SUPERHYDROPHOBIC OR SUPEROLEOPHOBIC SURFACESJuly 2024December 2025Allow1710NoNo
18770498CATALYST INK FOR PLATING AND ELECTROLESS PLATING METHOD USING SAMEJuly 2024December 2025Allow1720NoNo
18714638SOAKING AND ESC CLAMPING SEQUENCE FOR HIGH BOW SUBSTRATESMay 2024November 2025Allow1800NoNo
18714908A Lubricating ShuttleMay 2024December 2025Allow1810NoNo
18707196PROCESS FOR DIRECT DEPOSITION OF GRAPHENE OR GRAPHENE OXIDE ONTO A SUBSTRATE OF INTERESTMay 2024October 2025Allow1710NoNo
18691762TREATMENT STATION, TREATMENT SYSTEM, AND CORRESPONDING TREATMENT METHODMarch 2024February 2026Allow2310NoNo
18690898MULTI-ORIFICE NOZZLEMarch 2024October 2025Allow1910NoNo
18590383WINDOW AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1820NoNo
18490409System and Method for Liquid Dispense and Coverage ControlOctober 2023January 2026Allow2700NoNo
18454917METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR APPLYING A TRACING TO AN EXPANDABLE DEVICEAugust 2023January 2026Allow2910NoNo
18234308COATINGSAugust 2023October 2025Allow2620NoNo
18274158HOLDING JIG, OPTICAL ELEMENT COATING METHOD, AND OPTICAL LENS MANUFACTURING METHODJuly 2023November 2025Allow2710NoNo
18255768COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING HUMAN MILK OLIGOSACCHARIDES FOR USE IN A SUBJECT TO SUPPORT NIGHT SLEEP DURATIONJune 2023January 2026Allow3240NoNo
18253435BARRIER-COATED CELLULOSE-BASED SUBSTRATE, LAMINATED PACKAGING MATERIAL AND PACKAGING CONTAINER COMPRISING THE CELLULOSE-BASED SUBSTRATEMay 2023February 2026Allow3311NoNo
18120616COATING SYSTEM AND METHODMarch 2023October 2025Allow3121NoNo
18168523APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE, MASK ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE DISPLAY DEVICEFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3211NoNo
17119143System for Molding and Coating of Pharmaceutical TabletsJanuary 2023October 2025Allow5811NoNo
18088408SELECTIVE HYDRATION BY SITE SELECTIVE ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITIONDecember 2022January 2026Allow3721NoNo
18074051MODIFIED OVERPRINT VARNISHDecember 2022February 2026Allow3811NoNo
17817941STRUCTURAL IMPLANT FOR BONE REPAIRAugust 2022January 2026Allow4111NoNo
17636678Method for Making Microneedles Using a High Viscosity CompositionFebruary 2022January 2026Allow4721NoNo
17626996SYNTHETIC BARRIER MATERIAL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE THEREOFJanuary 2022February 2026Allow4931NoNo
17519858METHOD FOR AN ANALYTE SENSOR COVER-MEMBRANE PREPARATIONNovember 2021December 2025Allow4911YesNo
17474714METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICESeptember 2021November 2025Allow5030NoNo
17371592MULTI-ZONE HEATER WITH MINIMUM RF LOSSJuly 2021March 2026Allow5641YesNo
17146981COATED BALLOONS AND COATED BALLOON ASSEMBLIES AND RELATED METHODS OF USE AND MANUFACTUREJanuary 2021February 2026Abandon6030YesYes
16315327METHOD FOR PRODUCING DEPOSITION MASK, DEPOSITION MASK, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING ORGANIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEFebruary 2019November 2019Allow1001NoNo
16238457METALLIC MICRONEEDLESJanuary 2019October 2019Allow1010NoNo
16049749PORE FORMATION IN A SUBSTRATEJuly 2018June 2020Allow2201NoNo
160721693D PRINTER WITH TUNED COOLANT DROPLETSJuly 2018April 2021Allow3220YesNo
16019036LIQUID CRYSTAL DRIPPING NOZZLE, LIQUID CRYSTAL DRIPPING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIPPING LIQUID CRYSTALJune 2018May 2021Allow3411NoNo
15988531CEMENT SINTERING DEVICE AND CEMENT SINTERING METHODMay 2018October 2020Allow2810NoNo
15987727PLANT FOR ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTSMay 2018March 2021Allow3320NoNo
15769447METHOD FOR GRAFTING A BIOACTIVE POLYMER ONTO IMPLANTSApril 2018December 2020Allow3220NoNo
15768904Method for Preparing Chitosan/Heparinized Graphene Oxide Composite Multilayer Film on Surface of Medical Magnesium AlloyApril 2018June 2020Allow2600NoNo
15765846A METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) (PMMA) MEMBRANES AND USES THEREOFApril 2018August 2020Allow2910NoNo
15762536PRINTING PROCESS FOR ORAL DOSAGE FORMSMarch 2018March 2020Allow2410NoNo
15871029Biosensors for Detecting Cholesterol and OxLDL in Blood SampleJanuary 2018October 2020Allow3311YesNo
15793275Coating of a Vascular EndoprosthesisOctober 2017August 2019Abandon2120NoYes
15712809COMPLIANT HYDROPHILIC COATINGS FOR MEDICAL DEVICESSeptember 2017April 2020Allow3111YesNo
15636922Methods for Providing a Dyed Polymer LayerJune 2017December 2018Allow1810YesNo
15343716METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRODE FOR STORAGE BATTERYNovember 2016February 2019Allow2810NoNo
15280845STENT MADE FROM AN ULTRA HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT BIOABSORBABLE POLYMER WITH HIGH FATIGUE AND FRACTURE RESISTANCESeptember 2016August 2017Allow1020NoNo
15269802SURGICAL SUTURES INCORPORATED WITH STEM CELLS OR OTHER BIOACTIVE MATERIALSSeptember 2016January 2020Allow4011NoNo
15130621MULTIPLE SCAFFOLD DESIGN AND COATING THEREOFApril 2016August 2018Allow2800NoNo
15021183Coating of a Vascular EndoprosthesisMarch 2016June 2017Allow1610NoNo
14953293THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOFNovember 2015July 2018Allow3211NoNo
14928823METHOD OF DRYING BIOABSORBABLE COATING OVER STENTSOctober 2015May 2016Allow610NoNo
14922172PORTABLE, RAPID, AND INEXPENSIVE DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR CARDIAC DISEASE RISKOctober 2015November 2017Allow2420YesNo
14708528MEDICAL IMPLANT COMPRISING A BIODEGRADABLE MAGNESIUM-BASED ALLOY AND METHOD FOR ITS MANUFACTUREMay 2015February 2016Allow910NoNo
14436301METHOD FOR PRODUCING A NANOPOROUS LAYER ON A SUBSTRATEApril 2015December 2016Allow2111NoNo
14659276METHOD OF DRYING BIOABSORBABLE COATING OVER STENTSMarch 2015July 2015Allow400NoNo
14595387Surgical Finger, Hand and Arm Barrier Coating and Covering, Method and SystemJanuary 2015July 2017Allow3020NoNo
14409774METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRINTING PATTERNS ONTO THREE-DIMENSIONAL ARTICLESDecember 2014January 2016Allow1300NoNo
14522583Preparation method of radiation sensitive copolymer carrier for coating radiated nanoparticles and chemotherapy drugsOctober 2014June 2016Allow2000NoNo
14396033Regeneration of Antimicrobial Coatings Containing Metal Derivatives Upon Exposure to Aqueous Hydrogen PeroxideOctober 2014September 2016Allow2320YesNo
14330778Surgical Mesh Spray And Delivery SystemJuly 2014March 2016Allow2010YesNo
14302326REMOVING A SOLVENT FROM A DRUG-ELUTING COATINGJune 2014November 2016Allow2910NoNo
14302295SOLVENT METHOD FOR FORMING A POLYMER SCAFFOLDINGJune 2014January 2017Allow3220NoNo
14355087PROCESS FOR THE COATING OF TEXTILESApril 2014June 2017Allow3711NoNo
14254981IMPLANT BODY, METHOD OF MANUFACTURE OF SAME, AND DENTAL IMPLANTApril 2014November 2016Allow3101NoNo
14220310METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRODE FOR STORAGE BATTERYMarch 2014July 2016Allow2700NoNo
14206586APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR HYDRATING A PARTICULATE BIOMATERIAL WITH A LIQUID BIOMATERIALMarch 2014December 2016Allow3311NoNo
14186183BIOMATERIAL, JOINT PROSTHESIS USING THE BIOMATERIAL AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAMEFebruary 2014February 2015Allow1200NoNo
14155217METHOD OF DRYING BIOABSORBABLE COATING OVER STENTSJanuary 2014November 2014Allow1010NoNo
14044188ARTICLES HAVING NON-FOULING SURFACES AND PROCESSES FOR PREPARING THE SAME INCLUDING PRETREATMENT OF ARTICLESOctober 2013July 2016Abandon3311NoNo
14038300Method of Forming Hollow Tubular Drug Eluting Medical DevicesSeptember 2013October 2014Allow1200NoNo
14024970MICROFLUIDIC SURFACE PROCESSING SYSTEMS WITH SELF-REGULATED DISTANCE-TO SURFACE CONTROLSeptember 2013July 2015Allow2200NoNo
14000588Method of Protecting Biologically Active Substances against DenaturationAugust 2013November 2014Allow1520NoNo
13978390ARTIFICIAL EYES AND MANUFACTURE THEREOFAugust 2013March 2015Allow2111NoNo
13931385Methods for Leaving a Channel in a Polymer Layer Using a Cross-Linked Polymer PlugJune 2013December 2015Allow3001NoNo
13922326REINFORCEMENT LIQUID JET DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY PANELJune 2013May 2016Allow3411NoNo
13846711METHODS OF DRUG LOADING A HOLLOW STENT BY IMMERSIONMarch 2013October 2014Allow1910NoNo
13749483MANUFACTURING PROCESSES FOR MAKING MEDICAL DEVICES HAVING A COATING GRADIENTJanuary 2013March 2014Allow1410NoNo
13729630METHOD OF MAKING A STENTDecember 2012December 2014Allow2410NoNo
13666553COATING METHOD AND COATING DEVICE FOR MEDICAL IMPLANTSNovember 2012July 2014Allow2010NoNo
13651729SURGICAL FINGER, HAND AND ARM BARRIER COATING AND COVERING, METHOD AND SYSTEMOctober 2012September 2014Allow2310NoNo
13634514LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD MANUFACTURING METHODSeptember 2012April 2015Allow3110NoNo
13582083PATTERN TRANSFER METHOD AND APPARATUSAugust 2012June 2015Allow3411NoNo
13559483Method of Manufacturing an Offset Printing Substrate and Method of Manufacturing a Display Substrate Using the SameJuly 2012June 2015Allow3501NoNo
13550202METHODS OF MODIFYING STENT COATING THICKNESSESJuly 2012September 2013Allow1420NoNo
13456894Methods of fabricating large-area GrapheneApril 2012September 2014Allow2910NoNo
13322226COATING METHODFebruary 2012August 2015Allow4510NoNo
13331351COATING METHOD AND COATING DEVICEDecember 2011July 2014Allow3120NoNo
13283763Mechanical Stability of the Biomimetic Coating by Cross Linking of Surfactant PolymerOctober 2011September 2014Allow3411NoNo
13184696ROTATABLE SUPPORT ELEMENTS FOR STENTSJuly 2011November 2012Allow1620NoNo
12992120NANOSCALE COLLAGEN PARTICLES AND MEMBRANESNovember 2010September 2014Allow4630NoNo
12865632METHOD FOR PRODUCTION OF ORALLY RAPIDLY DISINTEGRATING TABLET COMPRISING IMIDAFENACIN AS ACTIVE INGREDIENTSeptember 2010December 2013Allow4120NoNo
12859802FINE METAL STRUCTURE, PROCESS FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, FINE METAL MOLD AND DEVICEAugust 2010December 2013Allow3920NoNo
12844863METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUBSTRATE FOR BIOCHIPJuly 2010July 2012Allow2410NoNo
12835420PREPARATION FOR RESTENOSIS PREVENTIONJuly 2010May 2012Allow2220NoNo
12742923SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENHANCING THE EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL CONTACT LENSES AND OTHER SURFACESMay 2010April 2012Allow2310NoNo
12765312HOT MELT ADHESIVE SYSTEM AND METHOD USING MACHINE READABLE INFORMATIONApril 2010November 2011Allow1911NoNo
12753613HYDROPHILIC POLYMERIC COATINGS FOR MEDICAL ARTICLESApril 2010December 2011Allow2100NoNo
12699127THERMAL TREATMENT OF A DRUG ELUTING IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICEFebruary 2010July 2011Allow1710NoNo
12693602PROCESSES FOR COATING A CARRIER WITH MICROPARTICLESJanuary 2010February 2014Allow4830NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PROCTOR, CACHET I.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
2
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
70.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
9
Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(66.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(33.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
91.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 66.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner PROCTOR, CACHET I - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner PROCTOR, CACHET I works in Art Unit 1712 and has examined 110 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.4%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner PROCTOR, CACHET I's allowance rate of 96.4% places them in the 86% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by PROCTOR, CACHET I receive 1.65 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 33% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PROCTOR, CACHET I is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 49% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -4.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PROCTOR, CACHET I. This interview benefit is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 55.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 87.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 10.0% of allowed cases (in the 93% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 13.2% of allowed cases (in the 91% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.