USPTO Examiner ROBINSON MIKHAIL O'DONNEL - Art Unit 1627

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18651454COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SHORT-CHAIN FATTY ACID, METHODS OF USE, AND METHODS OF MAKING THEREOFApril 2024November 2024Allow720YesNo
18600301TREATING SAR-COV-2 RELATED HEALTH PROBLEMSMarch 2024May 2025Abandon1410NoNo
18533052WOUND DRESSING BASED ON POLYMERIC MIXTURE OF CELLULOSE ACETATE AND HYALURONIC ACID EMBEDDED WITH COPPER OXIDE AND MAGNESIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLESDecember 2023December 2024Allow1220NoNo
18244012WOUND DRESSING BASED ON POLYMERIC MIXTURE OF CELLULOSE ACETATE AND HYALURONIC ACID EMBEDDED WITH COPPER OXIDE AND MAGNESIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLESSeptember 2023November 2024Allow1431YesNo
18134378SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLO PIPERIDINE CARBOXYLIC ACIDSApril 2023June 2024Allow1420YesNo
18123128LOW-GRADE INFLAMMATION COMPOSITIONSMarch 2023July 2025Allow2830NoNo
18082353LEVOCETIRIZINE AND MONTELUKAST IN THE TREATMENT OF CORONAVIRUS DISEASE AND SYMPTOMS THEREOFDecember 2022January 2025Abandon2520NoNo
17985622METHOD FOR ALLEVIATING CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE USING ROSOXACINNovember 2022March 2024Allow1610NoNo
180528384-Amino Pyrimidine Compounds for the Treatment of CancerNovember 2022May 2025Allow4030NoNo
17974000METHODS FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS, ORGAN INJURY, AND RELATED CONDITIONSOctober 2022February 2025Abandon2820NoNo
17969836COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF TOXIC GAS EXPOSUREOctober 2022July 2024Abandon2111NoNo
17960039AROMATIC IMMUNOREGULATORY COMPOUNDS FOR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASESOctober 2022July 2024Allow2220YesNo
17889244IRON SUPPLEMENT COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFAugust 2022May 2025Abandon3331NoNo
17567081METHOD, SYSTEM, FORMULATION AND KIT FOR THE TREATMENT OF ONYCHOMYCOSISDecember 2021January 2025Abandon3720NoNo
17555736TREATING SAR-COV-2 RELATED HEALTH PROBLEMSDecember 2021October 2022Allow1030YesNo
17618687PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF 2-FLUOROADENINEDecember 2021April 2025Allow4010NoNo
17548914CHEMICAL INHIBITION OF THE E3 LIGASE SUBUNIT FBXO7 CONFERS NEUROPROTECTION AND ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY BY STABILIZING MITOCHONDRIADecember 2021April 2025Allow4010NoNo
17544641COMBINATIONS OF INHIBITORS OF IRAK4 WITH INHIBITORS OF BTKDecember 2021May 2025Abandon4110NoNo
17543245COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CANCER THERAPYDecember 2021June 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17612951(R)-3-(3-CHLORO-5-FLUORO-2-((4-(1H-PYRAZOL-1-YL)-2-METHYLQUINOLIN-8-YLOXY)METHYL)PHENYL)MORPHOLINE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS AS BRADYKININ (BK) B2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST FOR TREATING SKIN DISEASESNovember 2021April 2025Allow4110NoNo
17612519COMPOSITION AND USE THEREOF FOR THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS MASTOCYTOSISNovember 2021May 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17606212PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING TREATMENT-RESISTANT CANCEROctober 2021March 2025Abandon4110NoNo
176059904H-PYRROLO[3,2-C]PYRIDIN-4-ONE DERIVATIVESOctober 2021April 2025Allow4210YesNo
17603553CD73 INHIBITORSOctober 2021April 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17603091COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING INFLAMMATORY DISORDERSOctober 2021April 2025Allow4210NoNo
17437761THERAPEUTIC AGENT FOR CORNEAL DISEASESSeptember 2021February 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17446063Pantoprazole Compositions and MethodsAugust 2021May 2024Allow3310NoNo
17433572HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND AND AGRICULTURAL OR HORTICULTURAL FUNGICIDEAugust 2021February 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17394572NEW ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUND ISOLATED FROM PSILOXYLON MAURITIANUM AND ITS DERIVATIVESAugust 2021October 2024Allow3821YesNo
17428406NOVEL AZOBENZENE DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR USE FOR THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT ASSOCIATED WITH IONIZING RADIATIONSAugust 2021March 2025Allow4320YesNo
17358002AMINOQUINAZOLINONE AND AMINOISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AND APPLICATION THEREOFJune 2021May 2025Allow4711NoNo
17418686COMPOSITION FOR SUPRESSING SECRETION OF EXTRACELLULAR VESICLESJune 2021June 2025Abandon4810NoNo
17418451A METHOD FOR TREATING SWI/SNF COMPLEX-DEFICIENT CANCERS COMPRISING GLUTATHIONE (GSH) METABOLIC PATHWAY INHIBITORJune 2021November 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17416175NEW SALICYLIC ACID DERIVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF, COMPOSITION THEREOF AND METHOD OF USE THEREOFJune 2021September 2024Abandon3910NoNo
174154961,3,4-OXADIAZOLES AND THEIR DERIVATIVES AS NEW ANTIFUNGAL AGENTSJune 2021February 2025Abandon4410NoNo
17311239VIBEGRON FOR THE TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER SYMPTOMSJune 2021March 2025Allow4520YesNo
17299361METHODS FOR TREATING CANCER IN MODELS HARBORING ESR1 MUTATIONSJune 2021June 2025Abandon4920NoNo
17293751PROPHYLACTIC OR THERAPEUTIC AGENT AND MEDICINAL COMPOSITION FOR IL-31-MEDIATED DISEASEMay 2021February 2025Abandon4501NoNo
17309200CANNABINOID COMPOSITIONS WITH HIGH SOLUBILITY AND BIOAVAILABILITYMay 2021January 2025Abandon4410NoNo
17244184GRANULATED PRODUCT CONTAINING ANTITUMOR AGENTApril 2021November 2024Abandon4310NoNo
17235120ANTIVIRAL 1,3-DI-OXO-INDENE COMPOUNDSApril 2021August 2024Allow4031YesNo
17233668INDOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS INHIBITORS OF MATERNAL EMBRYONIC LEUCINE ZIPPER KINASEApril 2021May 2025Abandon4920NoNo
17284323Compositions Comprising Guaifenesin and Flavour Compounds Containing an Isovanillyl GroupApril 2021June 2025Allow5040NoNo
17284112ANTICANCER ROCAGLAMIDE DERIVATIVESApril 2021February 2025Allow4730NoNo
17284380DISINFECTING COMPOSITION FOR TOPICAL USEApril 2021September 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17284306USNIC ACID DERIVATIVE HAVING TSLP SECRETION INHIBITORY ABILITY AND USE THEREOFApril 2021July 2024Allow3910YesNo
17283767DIHYDROIMIDAZOPYRAZINONE COMPOUND, COMPOSITION INCLUDING SAME, AND USE THEREOFApril 2021February 2025Abandon4620NoNo
17282058COMBINATION THERAPIESApril 2021October 2024Abandon4310NoNo
17279554METHOD FOR IMPROVING STABILITY OF LOW-CONCENTRATION ATROPINE OPHTHALMIC PREPARATIONMarch 2021January 2025Allow4620NoNo
17277603CDPK1 INHIBITORS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS RELATED THERETOMarch 2021July 2024Abandon4010NoNo
17254048(3S)- AND (3R)-6,7-BIS(HYDROXYMETHYL)-1H,3H-PYRROLO[1,2-C]THIAZOLES AS P53 ACTIVATORSDecember 2020April 2025Allow5230NoNo
17059378NITROIMIDAZOLE FORMULATIONSNovember 2020July 2024Allow4310NoNo
17045697CANCER SERUM BIOMARKERS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFOctober 2020September 2024Abandon4810NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL works in Art Unit 1627 and has examined 51 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 49.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL's allowance rate of 49.0% places them in the 7% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL receive 1.61 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +63.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL. This interview benefit is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 37.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 16.0% of allowed cases (in the 91% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.