USPTO Examiner AKAR SERKAN - Art Unit 3797

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18959018PPG SIGNAL QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD AND APPARATUS AND PPG SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEMNovember 2024April 2025Allow501YesNo
18776706CATHETER POSITION TRACKING AND REPRESENTATION USING A DYNAMIC SPRING MODEL AND MOTION EQUATIONJuly 2024June 2025Allow1120YesNo
18661494SYSTEM TO MONITOR AND MANAGE PATIENT HYDRATION VIA PLETHYSMOGRAPH VARIABILITY INDEX IN RESPONSE TO THE PASSIVE LEG RAISINGMay 2024May 2025Allow1300YesNo
18642853Device and Method for Deflecting and Focusing Shock Waves by a Reflection Surfaces with a Focal Point Different than a Projectile of a Thrust Direction of an ApplicatorApril 2024June 2025Allow1410YesNo
18429958INTRAVASCULAR IMAGING CATHETER SYSTEM WITH FORCE ERROR DETECTION AND AUTOMATIC REMEDIATION VIA PULLBACK AND ROTATIONFebruary 2024May 2025Allow1500YesNo
18532371FOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOR RELIEVING PAIN AND SWELLING IN SKIN TREATMENT USING ELECTRIC MUSCLE STIMULATION AND COOLINGDecember 2023February 2024Allow300YesNo
18115075RELEASABLE PORTABLE IMAGING DEVICE FOR MULTISPECTRAL MOBILE TISSUE ASSESSMENT VIA DETERMINING DRIVING INTENSITY CORRECTION FOR LEDSFebruary 2023September 2024Allow1821YesNo
18175485OPTICAL SURGICAL SYSTEM HAVING LIGHT EMITTERS AND LIGHT SENSORS COUPLED TO A CONTROLLER CONFIGURED TO REMOVE ANGULAR DISTORTION VIA COMPARISON OF ILLUMINATION PATTERNSFebruary 2023May 2024Allow1500NoNo
18166589ABLATION AND IMAGING CATHETER WITH USER INTERFACE TO CATALOGUE ABLATION PARAMTERS AND IDENTIFICATION LABELS FOR LESIONSFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2831YesNo
18058603IDENTIFYING A DEMENTIA BASED ON GAZE INFORMATION OF USER PERFORMING TASK ON A SCREEN AND GAZE TASK SCORENovember 2022February 2024Allow1520YesNo
17960337Blood Pressure Tracking and Detection SystemOctober 2022December 2023Allow1420YesNo
17880951HIGH SPEED ULTRASONIC THICK SLICE IMAGING BY COMBINING SLICE IMAGES WITH MICROBEAMFORMER PROVIDED IN THE PROBE TO CONTROL STEERINGAugust 2022January 2024Allow1700NoNo
17856487DIAGNOSTIC METHOD AND SYSTEM WITH OPTICAL AND TEMPERATURE SENSORS FOR IMAGING AND MAPPING FLUORESCENCE INTENSITIES OF TISSUEJuly 2022October 2024Allow2810YesNo
17838106IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IMAGES TO IMPROVE SPATIAL SPARSITY OF MICROBUBBLESJune 2022June 2025Allow3600YesNo
17686112Electromagnetic Tracking and Position Measurement System having Interference Reduction from Nearby Instrumentation by Filtering Time-Division Multiplexed Signal via Step FunctionMarch 2022August 2024Allow3020YesNo
17676000Method for detecting cancerous mass of breast via infrared by computer controlled motor for emitter and detector with collimator and windowFebruary 2022July 2024Allow2910YesNo
17457334DISPLACEMENT MECHANISM FOR PATIENT CONTROLLED PLACEMENT AND REMOVAL OF AN OPTICAL DEVICE IN A CONFINED SPACE ENVIRONMENTDecember 2021January 2025Allow3821YesNo
17534696OPTICAL TRACKING SYSTEM FOR TRACKING A PATIENT AND A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH A REFERENCE MARKER AND SHAPE MEASUREMENT DEVICE VIA COORDINATE TRANSFORMATIONNovember 2021April 2024Allow2900NoNo
17532838TRI-AXIAL SEISMOCARDIOGRAPHY DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MONITORING CARDIAC HEALTH AND IDENTIFYING A USER VIA CARDIAC FIDUCIARY MARKER MATCHINGNovember 2021February 2024Allow2621YesNo
17474443DETERMINING A HEATING EFFECT OF A MRI SEQUENCE ON A DIAGNOSTIC MODALITY DUE TO THE TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS AND METHOD OF PREDICTING AND COMPENSATING THE VARIATIONSSeptember 2021June 2025Allow4541YesNo
17462641REMOTE DETERMINATION OF ULTRASONIC CSF FLOWRATE IN VP SHUNT VIA MACHINE LEARNING AND ULTRASOUND FREQUENCY MATCHINGAugust 2021April 2024Allow3211YesNo
17396272Method to Detect Perfusion and Brain Functional Activities Using Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRIAugust 2021May 2025Abandon4501NoNo
17381376ULTRASOUND ENDOSCOPE FOR PREVENTING A NON-COAXIAL CABLE FROM BEING DISCONNECTED AND IMPROVING A DEGREE OF FREEDOM OF WIRINGJuly 2021December 2024Allow4140YesNo
17356558SCANNED LASER VEIN CONTRAST ENHANCER WITH REDUCED LASER INTENSITY DURING SCAN LINE REVERSALSJune 2021September 2024Allow3911YesNo
17345392Magnetic Tracking Calibration via Distortion Correction for Electromagnetic Fields Using Inside-Out TrackingJune 2021December 2024Allow4221YesNo
17194599Surgical Monitoring System and Related Methods For Spinal Pedicle Screw AlignmentMarch 2021July 2024Abandon4011YesNo
17193318DEVICES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS WITH SPECTRAL FILTERING FOR DETECTING WOUND AND IDENTIFYING BACTERIA BASED ON FLUORESCENCE SIGNATUREMarch 2021October 2024Allow4371YesYes
17249321DISTRIBUTED EXTRAVASATION DETECTION SYSTEM FOR FLUID CHANGE AND TO CONTROL THE FLUIDS LEVELS IN A BODY VIA WIRELESS INTERFACE BASED ON RATE OF ACTIVATION.February 2021January 2024Allow3511YesNo
17179429SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND IMAGE GUIDED THERAPY WITH SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET SHIELDING AND PROVIDING HEAT EXCHANGEFebruary 2021January 2025Allow4740YesNo
17072428INTEGRATED EXTRAVASATION AND INFILTRATION DETECTION DEVICE ON A RF ISOLATED FLEXIBLE SUBSTRATE WITH FLUID GUIDE TO DETECT FLUID CHANGES VIA SIGNAL COMPARISONOctober 2020September 2023Allow3511YesNo
17070993System and Method for Machine Learning based Mapping function of Patient Data from One Physiological State to Another Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Blood via Offline TrainingOctober 2020July 2024Allow4531YesNo
17031974COLLOCATED PET AND MRI ATTENUATION MAP ESTIMATION FOR RF COILS ATTENUATION CORRECTION VIA MACHINE LEARNINGSeptember 2020February 2025Allow5250YesNo
16989679Method and System for Personalized Treatment Planning in Ablation of Cancerous TissueAugust 2020May 2025Abandon5840YesNo
16927911ENHANCED STETHOSCOPE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT VIA PLURALITY OF ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCERS AND OPTICAL SENSORS TO DETERMINE TIME SERIES BLOOD VALUES USING AUTOENCODERSJuly 2020February 2024Allow4331YesNo
16868663WIRELESS AND POWER-SOURCE-FREE EXTRAVASATION AND INFILTRATION DETECTION SENSOR CIRCUITRY PROVIDED ON A SUBSTRATE WITH SIGNAL SPLITTERMay 2020September 2023Allow4011YesNo
16759573COGNITIVE FUNCTION EVALUATION SYSTEM, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DEMENTIA BY ANALYZING VOICE OF EVALUATEE FOR RECOGNITION, REMEMBERING OR JUGMENT CAPABILITIESApril 2020December 2023Allow4430YesNo
16649319METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR RANDOM NOISE SUPRESSION AND FILTERING OF ACOUSTIC CLUTTER VIA AUTOREGRESSIVE MOVING AVERAGE FILTERMarch 2020April 2025Allow6050YesNo
16673335SYSTEM TO MONITOR AND MANAGE PATIENT HYDRATION VIA PLETHYSMOGRAPH VARIABLITY INDEX IN RESPONSE TO THE PASSIVE LEG RAISINGNovember 2019February 2024Allow5131YesNo
16597656SYSTEM AND METHOD OF NONINVASIVE BLOOD FLOW MEASUREMENT DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION USING SIGNAL GATINGOctober 2019September 2024Allow6031YesNo
16577996SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSDERMALLY DETECTING TISSUE ISCHEMIA AND EVALUATING ORGAN FUNCTION USING SERUM LUMINESCENCESeptember 2019December 2024Allow6031YesNo
16470678SHORT WAVE INFRARED BEDSIDE OR INTRA OPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF WOUND OR BURN DEPTH AT DRY-WET LAYERS AND READINESS FOR RECONSTRUCTIONJune 2019October 2024Allow6041YesNo
16376691MAMMOGRAPHY-APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MEASURING A CONTACT AREA BETWEEN A BREAST AND THE MAMMOGRAPHY-APPARATUSApril 2019May 2024Abandon6030NoNo
16371878MEDICAL IMAGE DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS AND MEDICAL IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS FOR MRI or X-RAY CT VOLUME IMAGE CORRELATIONSApril 2019March 2024Allow5931YesNo
16272616METHODS FOR IN VIVO FUNDUS MONOCHROMOTIC ANGIOGRAPHY IMAGING BLOOD-CONTAINING TISSUE BY UTILIZING TWO WAVELENGTH FROM 400NM TO 620 NM AND 620 NM TO 800 NMFebruary 2019October 2023Allow5621YesNo
16254640FLEXIBLE SKIN THERAPY DEVICE HAVING PHOSPHORUS MATERIAL WITH LIGHT AND TRANSPARENT ELECTRICAL STIMULATION LAYERSJanuary 2019April 2024Allow6031YesNo
16315390SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING EDEMA BY FUSING HYPERSPECTRAL AND VISIBLE IMAGEJanuary 2019May 2024Allow6041YesNo
16131603Intravascular Imaging Catheter System with Force Error Detection and Automatic Remediation via Pullback and Rotation for Translating and Rotating a Torque Cable in a CatheterSeptember 2018October 2023Allow6040YesNo
16034678PUNCTURE SUPPORT DEVICE FOR DETERMINING SAFE LINEAR PUNCTURE ROUTES BY PUNCTURE REGION CLASSIFICATION AND SUPERIMPOSING OF IMAGESJuly 2018August 2023Allow6040NoNo
15727266SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROBOTIC SURGICAL INTERVENTION IN A MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGEROctober 2017November 2022Abandon6021NoYes
15718835Stent Planning Systems and Methods Using Vessel Representation obtained via Intravascular Probe by Determining Stent Effectiveness Score and Fractional Flow ReserveSeptember 2017September 2023Allow6051YesNo
14349333MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY WITH DISPLAYING THE CATHETER PLACEMENT POSITIONApril 2014November 2018Allow5520NoYes
14115527METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATED DETERMINATION OF STENT LANDING ZONES BASED ON A MAXIMUM DIAMETER OF A SEGMENTED BLOOD VESSEL DATA OBTAINED BY INTRAVASCULAR DEVICENovember 2013October 2023Allow6081NoNo
14008016CONTACTLESS SLEEP DISORDER SCREENING SYSTEMOctober 2013September 2018Allow6050NoNo
13796710Blood Vessel Lumen Morphology and Minimum Lumen Area Measurements Data Collection by Intravascular Imaging Systems for Stenosis or Stent PlanningMarch 2013August 2023Allow60100YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner AKAR, SERKAN.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
99.8%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
52.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner AKAR, SERKAN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner AKAR, SERKAN works in Art Unit 3797 and has examined 49 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 89.8%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner AKAR, SERKAN's allowance rate of 89.8% places them in the 70% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by AKAR, SERKAN receive 2.76 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 91% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AKAR, SERKAN is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +24.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AKAR, SERKAN. This interview benefit is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 61% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 4.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 57.1% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.