Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19051308 | INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT AND COST RECOVERY OF VEHICULAR ACCIDENT DAMAGE TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ASSETS | February 2025 | December 2025 | Abandon | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18635722 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSFERRING FUNDS BETWEEN A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION AND AN E-WALLET WITHIN AN INTERBANK NETWORK | April 2024 | February 2026 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18527952 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PRE-VERIFICATION OF CRYPTOCURRENCY TRANSACTIONS ON BLOCKCHAIN NETWORKS | December 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18496501 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPERATING FINANCIAL SERVICE ON THE BASIS OF STAGE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | October 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18206903 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATING REAL-TIME MORTGAGE INSURANCE RATE QUOTES FOR MORTGAGE BROKERS | June 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18205897 | Heppner Cangany AltRating™ - Computer-Implemented Integrated Simulation System for Generating Credit Ratings of Alternative Assets | June 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18203572 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TOKENIZED REAL ESTATE | May 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18251162 | Rating System for Comparative Analysis of Tradable Securities and Method Thereof | April 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18303061 | PLATFORM AND CARBON OFFSET APPLICATIONS FOR GREEN SHARE FUND COMPONENTS | April 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18302912 | PRESENTATION MANAGEMENT OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | April 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18107403 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXTENDING AN INTELLIGENT LINE OF CREDIT FOR AGGREGATING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS | February 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18102572 | System Facilitating Government Mitigation of Damage at Public and Private Facilities | January 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18101621 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING POLICY DOCUMENTS | January 2023 | December 2024 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18092783 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING A VARIABLE CREDIT OFFER FOR A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT | January 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17866181 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING THE MOST LIKELY SUPPLEMENTARY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR A GIVEN PRIMARY SERVICE BY IDENTIFYING PATTERNS BETWEEN CO-OCCURRING BILLED SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES IN HISTORICAL CLAIMS DATA | July 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17865252 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR QUANTIFYING THE PRIMACY OF A FINANCIAL RELATION | July 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17861511 | DISTRIBUTED LEDGER AND BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY-BASED RECRUITMENT, JOB SEARCHING AND/OR PROJECT SEARCHING, SCHEDULING, AND/OR ASSET TRACKING AND/OR MONITORING, AND/OR PRINCIPAL/AGENT RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT AND/OR MONITORING, APPARATUS AND METHOD | July 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17857878 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR DYNAMICALLY MODELING A CURRENT PRICE OF AN INVOICE ISSUED BY A SELLER BASED ON REAL-TIME MONITORING OF TRANSACTION DATA ON A COMPUTER NETWORK | July 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17853535 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR CODE ANALYSIS AND DATA STORAGE WITH CRYPTOGRAPHY | June 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17843093 | CHATBOT EXPERIENCE TO EXECUTE BANKING FUNCTIONS | June 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17713133 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODELING TELEMATICS DATA | April 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17697128 | MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR PREDICTING CLIENT SENSITIVITY TO RATE CHANGES IN COMMERCIAL DEPOSIT PRODUCTS | March 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17667001 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA MAPPING BETWEEN UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM INSURANCE SYSTEMS | February 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17590762 | METHOD AND COMPUTING APPARATUS FOR INTEGRATING DYNAMIC WEB SOURCE DATA WITH STANDARD VEHICLE CONFIGURATION DATA FOR A VIN-BASED INQUIRY | February 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17588879 | Conditional Transaction Pre-Approval | January 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17519129 | GENERATING USER INTERFACES COMPRISING DYNAMIC BASE LIMIT VALUE USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS DETERMINED FROM A BASE LIMIT VALUE MODEL | November 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17508386 | BLOCKCHAIN-ENABLED ELECTRONIC FUTURES TRADING SYSTEM WITH COMPUTERIZED OPTIONAL DELIVERY OF CRYPTOCURRENCY OR FIAT AND OPTIONAL CRYPTOCURRENCY AND FIAT RESERVE | October 2021 | August 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17461993 | SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE FOR MACHINE LEARNING FEATURE GENERATION | August 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17406790 | AUTOMATED ITERATIVE PREDICTIVE MODELING COMPUTING PLATFORM | August 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 50 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17379639 | TAINTED ASSET MARKER MANAGEMENT | July 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17364266 | CLAIM ASSIGNMENT SYSTEM | June 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17363781 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR DYNAMIC CACHING AND ROUTING OF HEALTH CARE PAYMENT PLAN ELIGIBILITY RESPONSES | June 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17414321 | ATTEMPT ASSISTANCE SYSTEM | June 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17345642 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS | June 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17340526 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A MARKET DATA HUB WITH DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT | June 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17314906 | SYSTEM FOR CHECK IMAGE CAPTURE | May 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17218868 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PROCESSING MEDICAL CLAIM DENIALS USING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENGINE | March 2021 | August 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17152656 | CONDITION TREE OPTIMIZATION | January 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 59 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17125924 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING AN AFFORDABILITY INDEX | December 2020 | February 2025 | Abandon | 50 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16948938 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRIORITIZING TRANSMISSION OF TRADING DATA OVER A BANDWITDH-CONSTRAINED COMMUNICATION LINK | October 2020 | July 2025 | Allow | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17008393 | COLLECTING AND EVALUATING DRIVING DATA FOR EXTENDING AN INSURANCE OFFER | August 2020 | May 2025 | Abandon | 57 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17004569 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REAL TIME, DYNAMIC MANAGEMENT OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE, SERVICES, AND REPORTING | August 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16746775 | FIRST PARTY FRAUD DETECTION | January 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 59 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16577821 | ANOMALY AND FRAUD DETECTION USING DUPLICATE EVENT DETECTOR | September 2019 | September 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16575219 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICES AND METHODS | September 2019 | October 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16529773 | LINKING EVENTS WITH LINEAGE RULES | August 2019 | May 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16346458 | VERIFYING AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN A COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND A USER | April 2019 | December 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16230112 | MULTIPLE CHAIN MESSAGE DATA RECORDATION WITH ADJUSTABLE VISIBILITY PERMISSIONING | December 2018 | October 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 9 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16229575 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTHENTICATING ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS AT VIRTUAL REALITY DEVICES USING MOBILE APP PAYMENT ACCOUNT(S) | December 2018 | May 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 11 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15857305 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTI-LAYERED BILLING IN A CLOUD SERVICE BROKERAGE | December 2017 | August 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14985543 | DELTA-BASED SIMULATION SYSTEMS | December 2015 | November 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 12 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14751343 | AUTOMATIC CHARGEBACK MANAGEMENT | June 2015 | March 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner EKECHUKWU, CHINEDU U.
With a 15.4% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 8.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner EKECHUKWU, CHINEDU U works in Art Unit 3695 and has examined 27 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 7.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 54 months.
Examiner EKECHUKWU, CHINEDU U's allowance rate of 7.4% places them in the 1% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by EKECHUKWU, CHINEDU U receive 5.74 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 100% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by EKECHUKWU, CHINEDU U is 54 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +8.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by EKECHUKWU, CHINEDU U. This interview benefit is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 83.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 35.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 71.4% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.