Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19272858 | DISPLAY CUSTOMIZATION SYSTEM FOR 3D MODEL SHOPPING INTERFACE | July 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 19218195 | METHOD FOR GENERATING IMAGES OF SYNTHETIC PRODUCTS THAT ARE IMMEDIATELY MANUFACTURABLE | May 2025 | February 2026 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18526882 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND ARTICLE OF MANUFACTURE FOR COMPUTER SEARCH ENGINE RANKING FOR ACCESSORY AND SUB-ACCESSORY REQUESTS | December 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18470818 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE FOR AUGMENTED REALITY APPLICATION FOR DISPLAY OF VIRTUAL OBJECTS | September 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18237622 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPUTER GENERATED RECOMMENDATIONS WITH IMPROVED ACCURACY AND RELEVANCE | August 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18220953 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FAST-TRACK DELIVERY OF ADD-ON GOODS TO CUSTOMERS AT CHECKOUT LOCATIONS OF A PHYSICAL STORE | July 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18214536 | MANUFACTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR COLLABORATIVE AND IMPROVED PROCESSING OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS IN A VENDOR SERVICE AREA | June 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18215005 | SYSTEMS, MANUFACTURES, AND METHODS FOR A COMMERCE PLATFORM COORDINATING TRANSACTIONS WITHIN THIRD PARTY APPLICATIONS | June 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18135909 | SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING DIGITAL MAP CORRECTIONS | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18184609 | System and Method for Catalog Data Enrichment | March 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18097090 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VALIDATING PURCHASE OF RESTRICTED MERCHANDISE | January 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17880045 | METHOD, ARTICLE OF MANUFACTURE, AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING CATEGORY SUGGESTIONS | August 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17806880 | AUTOMATED SYSTEM TO FACILITATE REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS | June 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17780721 | COMPANION ANIMAL CUSTOMIZED FEED ORDER SYSTEM | May 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17740590 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTED GIFTING TRANSACTIONS BASED ON MERCHANT WEBSITE DATA | May 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17767134 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR RECOMMENDING FASHION PRODUCT | April 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17702522 | MANUFACTURING ORDERING ASSISTANCE APPARATUS, METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17701885 | INFORMATION PROVIDING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROVIDING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17701082 | CAR WASH POINT OF SALE SYSTEM AND MANUFACTURE | March 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17700374 | Machine Learning Based Automated Product Classification | March 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17673552 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MANUFACTURES FOR CHARGER SUCCESS RATE AND USAGE MONITORING | February 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17635530 | METHOD FOR NAVIGATING WITHIN AND DETERMINING NON-BINARY, SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCES WITHIN VERY LARGE AND SPECIFIC DATA SETS HAVING OBJECTIVELY CHARACTERIZED METADATA | February 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17582957 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND ARTICLE OF MANUFACTURE FOR MANAGING CLICK AND DELIVERY SHOPPING EVENTS | January 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17581007 | Curated Collections Based On Templates | January 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17562803 | METHODS, MANUFACTURES, AND SYSTEMS FOR PRODUCT DETECTION ON MERCHANT WEBSITES | December 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17645386 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PRODUCT DISPLAY VISUALIZATION IN AUGMENTED REALITY PLATFORMS | December 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17545627 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED VIDEO GENERATION FROM IMAGES FOR E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS | December 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17481218 | AUGMENTED REALITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PURCHASING | September 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17328343 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATION OF LOCAL BUSINESS INVENTORIES | May 2021 | July 2023 | Abandon | 25 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17283802 | SERVER APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROVISION METHOD OF COMPONENT SELECTION SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR COMPONENT SELECTION SYSTEM | April 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17163373 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING SEARCH RETRIEVAL | January 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 57 | 6 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17146957 | PRODUCT QUALITY INSPECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS | January 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17257630 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR CONTROL AND ALLOCATION OF ACCESS RIGHTS WITH VARIABLE PRICE | January 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17250287 | ITEM CURATION WITH INGREDIENT-BASED LENS | December 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17023551 | METHOD, MANUFACTURE, AND APPARATUS FOR FACILITATING ON-DEMAND HOME AND AUTO SERVICES | September 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 46 | 6 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16595306 | BUYER-SELLER VALIDATION AND COMMUNICATION PLATFORM | October 2019 | November 2022 | Abandon | 37 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16229482 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND MANUFACTURE FOR VIRTUAL JEWELRY SHOPPING IN SECONDARY MARKETS | December 2018 | February 2020 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15415791 | METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DISPLAYING SEARCH INFORMATION | January 2017 | March 2020 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15281650 | PROVIDING BETTER CUSTOMER SERVICE BY ANALYZING CUSTOMER COMMUNICATIONS | September 2016 | August 2017 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14676809 | VIRTUAL JEWELRY SHOPPING IN SECONDARY MARKETS | April 2015 | May 2018 | Allow | 37 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14480336 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASYNCHRONOUS CONSUMER ITEM SEARCHING REQUESTS WITH SYNCHRONOUS PARALLEL SEARCHING | September 2014 | March 2018 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14175663 | EMBEDDED WEB APPLICATION GALLERY | February 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13615851 | PRODUCT REVIEW SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2012 | November 2016 | Allow | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SMITH, LINDSEY B works in Art Unit 3688 and has examined 19 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 73.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.
Examiner SMITH, LINDSEY B's allowance rate of 73.7% places them in the 38% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SMITH, LINDSEY B receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 87% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SMITH, LINDSEY B is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 22% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +77.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SMITH, LINDSEY B. This interview benefit is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 11.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 80.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 40% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.