Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18949623 | GENERATING TRANSACTIONAL DOCUMENTS | November 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18920709 | ARCHITECTURE FOR QUANTIFYING AVOIDED CARBON EMISSIONS IN A DIGITAL ENGINEERING PLATFORM | October 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18732346 | SECURE SERVICE RECIPIENT ONLINE PORTAL | June 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18444538 | SECURE SERVICE RECIPIENT ONLINE PORTAL | February 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18418972 | Baggage Imagery Reanalysis for Multi-Modal Travel | January 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18413441 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROGRAMMATICALLY ACCESSING FINANCIAL DATA | January 2024 | July 2024 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18514924 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CREATING LUGGAGE MANIFEST USING B-TYPE MESSAGE, AIRLINE CODE AND FLIGHT DATA | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18514914 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING LUGGAGE MANIFESTS | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18510578 | METHOD, INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) SYSTEM, AND MEDIUM FOR DISPOSING EMERGENCY GAS SUPPLY OF SMART GAS | November 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18370675 | COMPLIANCE DOCUMENT CREATION, MODIFICATION, AND PROVISIONING | September 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18462213 | SECONDARY MARKET AND VENDING SYSTEM FOR DEVICES | September 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18348889 | CARBON EMISSION OPTIMIZATION FOR DEVICE LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT | July 2023 | February 2024 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18333803 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROPERTY GROUP ANALYSIS | June 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18180176 | AI-Based Platform for Automated Labor Law Compliance Associated With Mining Operations | March 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18090239 | APPARATUS FOR PROPORTIONAL CALCULATION REGARDING NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS | December 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18069059 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING REPAIRS TO A VEHICLE | December 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18062629 | METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING CARBON COINS IN A BLOCKCHAIN SYSTEM USING PROOF OF CAPTURE | December 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17993192 | INCENTIVIZED MULTI-STREAM RECYCLING SYSTEM WITH FILL LEVEL, VOLUME, WEIGHT, COUNTERS, SHREDDER, COMPACTOR, CONSUMER IDENTIFICATION, DISPLAY AND LIQUID DRAINAGE SYSTEM | November 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17984188 | METHOD FOR PRESENTING DATA ABOUT A CONSTRUCTION SITE | November 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17941748 | Method for Questioning Jurors | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17817296 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECYCLING CONSUMER ELECTRONIC DEVICES | August 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17815205 | SECONDARY MARKET AND VENDING SYSTEM FOR DEVICES | July 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17789688 | PATENT TRANSACTION PREDICTION METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND PATENT TRANSACTION PLATFORM | June 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17827530 | MATCHING VALIDATION | May 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17769175 | MANAGEMENT OF RECYCLABLE GOODS AND THEIR SOURCE MATERIALS | April 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17683143 | AGREEMENT DOCUMENT EXECUTION BASED ON DOCUMENT MODEL IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | February 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17683268 | Gradar Web, Cloud and AI Based Fundraising Evaluation Auto Pitch Deck Generator and Feedback System | February 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17578994 | METHOD FOR VALIDATING A PRODUCT PORTFOLIO | January 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17562791 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING INTERCEPTION AND AUDITING SERVICES IN COMPOSED INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEMS | December 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17561549 | NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING ANALYSIS OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS | December 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17549683 | INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM MAIN BOARD DISPOSITION AUTOMATED USING PERFORMANCE METRICS | December 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17444831 | INFORMATION SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROVIDING METHOD FOR STORAGE BATTERY | August 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17384487 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CUSTOMER AND/OR CONTAINER DISCOVERY BASED ON GPS DRIVE PATH ANALYSIS FOR A WASTE / RECYCLING SERVICE VEHICLE | July 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17383933 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF A TRANSITION AND NOTIFICATION PROTOCOL | July 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17350828 | COMPUTING DEVICES AND METHODS FOR EXCHANGING IDENTITY DATA | June 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17317507 | WASTING STATION FOR MEDICATIONS | May 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17282985 | METHOD OF RECIRCLING AND ASSOCIATED COMPUTER PROGRAM | April 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17281106 | METHOD FOR MANAGING HEALTH SERVICE SOLID WASTE | March 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17205810 | DECOMMISSIONING TRANSPORT BATTERIES | March 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17196311 | Management System for Hard Drive Dismantling System | March 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17266384 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR BALANCED MATCHING OF OPPORTUNITY DATA WITH ONE OR MORE SPONSOR DATA | February 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17157163 | CONTROL METHOD, FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND DATA STRUCTURE | January 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17143955 | METHODS FOR MONITORING COMMUNICATIONS CHANNELS AND DETERMINING TRIGGERS AND ACTIONS IN ROLE-BASED COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS | January 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 44 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17125994 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VENDING AND/OR PURCHASING MOBILE PHONES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES | December 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16766819 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHARING DATA ACROSS GROUPS | May 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 58 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 16880734 | STREAMLINED RECORD ASSOCIATION AND UPDATES | May 2020 | February 2025 | Abandon | 57 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16583573 | PRESENTATION OF AN OVERVIEW OF PRODUCT LIFECYCLE RISK FOR COMPONENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT | September 2019 | January 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16430910 | LAND ACQUISITION AND PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS PLATFORM | June 2019 | December 2024 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16426667 | Raw Material and/or Recycling System | May 2019 | September 2024 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16400490 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A DOCUMENT BASED ON RETRIEVED DATA | May 2019 | December 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15911682 | APPLIANCE NETWORK WITH A SMART CONTROL, HOST MULTI-FUNCTION AND EXTERNAL APPLIANCE WITH FOOD CONTAINERS AND METHODS | March 2018 | July 2022 | Allow | 52 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15907143 | Communication session management based on intelligent database analysis of semi-anonymized user activity | February 2018 | April 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MINCARELLI, JAN P.
With a 25.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 14.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner MINCARELLI, JAN P works in Art Unit 3626 and has examined 24 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 66.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner MINCARELLI, JAN P's allowance rate of 66.7% places them in the 28% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by MINCARELLI, JAN P receive 3.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MINCARELLI, JAN P is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MINCARELLI, JAN P. This interview benefit is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 41.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 33.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 37% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.