Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18658596 | MARKET SEGMENT ANALYSIS OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE OFFERINGS | May 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 9 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18634023 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE AGENDAS FOR ONE-ON-ONE MEETINGS | April 2024 | May 2025 | Abandon | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18564566 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF MODIFYING IDLE THRESHOLDS FOR CHARGING ELECTRIC VEHICLES | November 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18480390 | COMPUTER SIMULATION SKILLS TRAINING TECHNIQUES | October 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18463434 | VEHICLE DRIVER SAFETY PERFORMANCE BASED ON RELATIVITY | September 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18339179 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOMMENDING A WORKPLAN SCHEDULE | June 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18038062 | Supply Method Determination Device | May 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18138082 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FUTURE EVENT RECOMMENDATION | April 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18295843 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEVELOPING COMPONENTS FOR A DEVICE APPLICATION | April 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18174810 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR QUOTA PLANNING OPTIMIZATION | February 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18172232 | Order Processing for Remotely Ordered Goods | February 2023 | February 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18168945 | METHOD FOR ENSURING HIGHLY RELIABLE EXECUTION OF PROCESSES AND CONTINUOUS OPTIMIZATION OF HUMAN WORKFLOWS THROUGH REAL-TIME MEASUREMENT AND SCORING OF HUMAN PERFORMANCE | February 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18040377 | EVALUATING ENTITY BEHAVIOUR IN A CONTRACTUAL SITUATION | February 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18161684 | BENCHMARKING THROUGH DATA MINING | January 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18101234 | ANTICIPATING TRANSPORTATION ON DEMAND NEEDS | January 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18158747 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BOOTSTRAP SCHEDULING | January 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18148917 | SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMIZING A DELIVERY PROCESS | December 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18089030 | Automatic and Dynamic Adaptation of Hierarchical Reconciliation for Time Series Forecasting | December 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18068679 | COMPUTERIZED METHOD FOR PERFORMING WORK-FLOW DRILLING OPERATION MANAGEMENT FOR OFFSHORE DRILLING OPERATIONS | December 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17928366 | OPTIMIZATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, OPTIMIZATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | November 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18056321 | MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD TO MANAGE ACTIVITY NOTIFICATIONS WITHIN UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE | November 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17987164 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE AGENDAS FOR ONE-ON-ONE MEETINGS | November 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17978592 | Machine Learning-based Knowledge Management for Incident Response | November 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17977522 | CARBON FOOTPRINT SIZING FOR CLOUD SOLUTIONS | October 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17973688 | PROACTIVE SCHEDULING OF SHARED RESOURCES OR RESPONSIBILITIES | October 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17970426 | ACCESS AND MANAGEMENT FOR REMOTE EMPLOYEES | October 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17935353 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING MERGERS AND ACQUISITION VULNERABILITIES IN FINANCIAL MARKETS | September 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17902654 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELING OF MIXED MEDIA MARKETING | September 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17730605 | SUSTAINABILITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HYDROCARBON OPERATIONS | April 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17651649 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INDOOR FARMS REMOTELY AND USER INTERFACE FOR SAME | February 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17627306 | PRODUCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | January 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17567106 | GENERATING A MITIGATION WORKFLOW FOR MITIGATING A TECHNICAL ISSUE OF A COMPUTING SERVICE USING HISTORICAL MITIGATION WORKFLOWS | December 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17558541 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A SUSTAINABILITY SCORE | December 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17643002 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING STATEMENT EVENTS | December 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17530182 | USER INTERACTION AND NOTIFICATION SYSTEM | November 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 38 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17526749 | INTELLIGENT SCORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCORING A LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE OF A BUSINESS UNIT OF A PLURALITY OF BUSINESS UNITS IN AN ORGANIZATION | November 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 35 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17524636 | PROCESS FOR INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH BUSINESS CYCLE | November 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17453392 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING SHARED DATA ANALYTICS HUB | November 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17510693 | AUTOMATED POLICY PROPAGATION FOR ASSOCIATED PROCESS DEFINITION FILES AND PROCESS AUTOMATION FILES | October 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17498994 | SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING AIRCRAFT TURNAROUND TIME BASED ON GEOSPATIAL DATA AND AIRCRAFT LOCATION DATA | October 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17490398 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED INTERRUPTION AND RESUMPTION MANAGEMENT | September 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17389350 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM OF PROVIDING REWARD-TYPE PRACTICAL TRAINING TO PRACTICAL TRAINING PARTICIPANT IN CROWDSOURCING-BASED PROJECT | July 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17420482 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VALUING THE MOVEMENT AND FLOW OF DATA | July 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17339675 | FARM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | June 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17236762 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVISIONING WORKFLOWS WITH PROACTIVE DATA TRANSFORMATION | April 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17220437 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION FROM A SENSOR ASSOCIATED WITH A USER | April 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17218213 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR STORING PROGRAM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE | March 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17280905 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING COGNITIVE ATTRIBUTES FROM AN ADJUSTED FORECAST TO AUTOMATICALLY RECOMMEND IMPROVED ADJUSTED FORECAST | March 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17184649 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING SHORT-TERM DISPATCHING DECISIONS FOR OPERATING A NUMBER OF RESOURCES INVOLVED IN A NUMBER OF PRODUCTION PROCESSES UNDER CONSIDERATION OF LONG-TERM OBJECTIVES | February 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 41 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17139833 | Analytics and Device Management Platform for Human Interaction | December 2020 | October 2024 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16914813 | UTILIZING DIGITAL SIGNALS TO INTELLIGENTLY MONITOR CLIENT DEVICE TRANSIT PROGRESS AND GENERATE DYNAMIC PUBLIC TRANSIT INTERFACES | June 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16571232 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED POINTING AND PRIORITIZING FOCUS ON CHALLENGES | September 2019 | November 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15818646 | IDENTIFYING INSTALLATION SITES FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL STATIONS | November 2017 | December 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 14937185 | PREDICTIVE AND CORRECTIVE REPORTING OF VENUE OPERATING HOURS | November 2015 | September 2017 | Allow | 22 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14270735 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF SUBMITTING DAILY FIELD REPORTS | May 2014 | May 2015 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12943125 | Recommending Alternatives For Providing A Service | November 2010 | November 2016 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 20.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN works in Art Unit 3625 and has examined 25 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 44.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN's allowance rate of 44.0% places them in the 9% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN receive 3.44 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 93% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +40.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN. This interview benefit is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 5.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.