Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17124496 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ONLINE MONITORING OF HEALTH STATUS OF INSULATED-GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR MODULE | December 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17114159 | DETECTION OF A CLOGGED FILTER IN AN ASPIRATING DETECTION SYSTEM | December 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15734031 | RIPPLE FILTER UNIT FOR USE IN RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT, METHODS FOR RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS | December 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17107365 | HAIRPIN TYPE STATOR INSPECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TESTING THE SAME | November 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17086933 | FIRST OBJECT FOR ASSEMBLY WITH A SECOND OBJECT AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLY THEREOF | November 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17003594 | HYBRID SWITCH FOR SUBSTATION AND OTHER APPLICATIONS AND METHODS OF OPERATING SAME | August 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16999272 | MULTI-CORE CABLE FAULT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | August 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16918242 | TARGET AND ALGORITHM TO MEASURE OVERLAY BY MODELING BACK SCATTERING ELECTRONS ON OVERLAPPING STRUCTURES | July 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16806742 | Systems, Methods and Computer Program Products for Charging Autonomous Wireless Sensors in Subsurface Environments | March 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16703379 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SENSOR FOR DETECTING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE AND SENSOR FOR DETECTING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME | December 2019 | January 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16610786 | DRILLING FLUID CONTAMINATION DETERMINATION FOR DOWNHOLE FLUID SAMPLING TOOL | November 2019 | July 2023 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16589809 | MODULAR POWER TILE AND METHOD OF OPERATING A POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM | October 2019 | April 2023 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16496806 | METHOD FOR ACCURATE FAULT LOCATION IN A MULTI-TYPE CABLE CONNECTION SYSTEM, A DEVICE AND A STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOF | September 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16533180 | ACTIVE ISOLATION DETECTION USING ADAPTIVE BIAS RESISTANCE | August 2019 | April 2023 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16394134 | PER-TENANT COST CALCULATION IN MULTI-TENANT DATA STORAGE SYSTEM | April 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 50 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16081577 | METHOD FOR CALIBRATING BIOMASS SENSORS OPERATING WITH IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY AND USE OF A SUSPENSION FOR CARRYING OUT SUCH A METHOD | August 2018 | March 2023 | Allow | 55 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J works in Art Unit 2881 and has examined 16 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 93.8%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J's allowance rate of 93.8% places them in the 81% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J receive 2.31 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 61% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -10.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GASSEN, CHRISTOPHER J. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 40.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 25.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.