USPTO Examiner RAYAN MIHIR K - Art Unit 2619

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18905868SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING ADAPTIVE RECENTERING IN VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTSOctober 2024February 2025Allow400NoNo
18745940DETERMINING ANGULAR ACCELERATIONJune 2024April 2025Allow1010NoNo
18732585SCAN DRIVER AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING THE SAMEJune 2024April 2025Allow1110NoNo
18665129DATA MODELING FOR VIRTUAL COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENTMay 2024April 2025Allow1110NoNo
18640553Thumbnail for Disambiguation in a Visual SearchApril 2024April 2025Allow1210NoNo
18637565INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODApril 2024April 2025Allow1100NoNo
18637356UI FOR HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY SYSTEMApril 2024February 2025Allow1000NoNo
18636357REFINING HEAD POSE TRACKING BASED ON SEAT POSITION AND ORIENTATIONApril 2024March 2025Allow1100NoNo
18635525INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODApril 2024April 2025Allow1210YesNo
18601526DISPLAY DRIVER AND DISPLAY APPARATUSMarch 2024May 2025Allow1510NoNo
18598452HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY APPARATUSMarch 2024March 2025Abandon1310NoNo
18591492MULTI-WAY INPUT DEVICEFebruary 2024January 2025Allow1000NoNo
18443164Electronic Device With Optical Sensor for Color DetectionFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1210NoNo
18434627TOUCHPAD FORCE DETERMINATIONSFebruary 2024April 2025Allow1410NoNo
18293504Smart Algorithm for Seamless Transition with Under Display Fingerprint SensorsJanuary 2024December 2024Allow1100NoNo
18291979Method And Device For Dynamic Sensory And Input Modes Based On Contextual StateJanuary 2024May 2025Allow1620YesNo
18403599EYE DETECTION METHODS AND DEVICESJanuary 2024January 2025Allow1210YesNo
18540007DISPLAY DEVICEDecember 2023March 2025Allow1510NoNo
18528781HOW TO LAYOUT THE SIGNAL LINES ON THE UPPER LAYER OF THE CONDUCTORDecember 2023June 2025Allow1820NoNo
18526892DISPLAY APPARATUS AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOFDecember 2023December 2024Allow1210YesNo
18508890DISPLAY APPARATUS AND DISPLAY CONTROL METHODNovember 2023May 2025Allow1810NoNo
18505172DYNAMIC USER INPUT SYSTEM AND METHODNovember 2023September 2025Abandon2220NoNo
18559341TOUCH STRUCTURE AND TOUCH DISPLAY APPARATUSNovember 2023October 2024Allow1100NoNo
18503575SHIFT REGISTER AND METHOD FOR DRIVING THE SAMENovember 2023December 2024Allow1310NoNo
18496895DISPLAY PANELS AND DISPLAY DEVICESOctober 2023March 2025Allow1710NoNo
18557376Anchoring Tracking Device Space to Hand Tracking SpaceOctober 2023June 2025Allow1920NoNo
18382532ELECTRONIC DEVICEOctober 2023February 2025Allow1510NoNo
18488977IMAGE PRESENTING METHOD AND DISPLAY APPARATUSOctober 2023May 2025Abandon1830NoNo
18477430MULTIPLE-MAGNET HAND-MOUNTED POSITION-TRACKING DEVICESeptember 2023March 2025Allow1720NoNo
18368307WEARABLE DEVICE FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT AN APPLICATION THROUGH AN EXTERNAL DISPLAY AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE WEARABLE DEVICESeptember 2023December 2024Allow1510NoNo
18454698SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING LOWER BODY POSESAugust 2023September 2024Allow1310YesNo
18278117Pump Having a Control PanelAugust 2023May 2025Allow2120NoNo
18262431TOUCH STRUCTURE, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUSJuly 2023November 2024Allow1600NoNo
18203600DETECTING MANUALLY APPLIED PRESSUREMay 2023November 2024Allow1810NoNo
18313450DYNAMIC FOCUSING HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAYMay 2023September 2024Allow1720NoNo
18028522Pixel Circuit and Drive Method thereof, Display Panel, and Display ApparatusMarch 2023November 2024Allow2010NoNo
18112115INPUT ASSEMBLIES FOR EXERCISE MACHINES AND METHODS OF ASSEMBLING INPUT ASSEMBLIES FOR EXERCISE MACHINESFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2510NoNo
17455148DRIVING CIRCUIT, DRIVING METHOD AND MICROFLUIDIC SUBSTRATENovember 2021November 2024Allow3600NoNo
16763818LIGHT CONTROL SHEETMay 2020June 2025Allow6040NoYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RAYAN, MIHIR K.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
93.8%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
1
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(100.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
96.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner RAYAN, MIHIR K - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RAYAN, MIHIR K works in Art Unit 2619 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RAYAN, MIHIR K's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RAYAN, MIHIR K receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RAYAN, MIHIR K is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.