Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19227615 | System and Method for Scheduling Display of Incoming Messages | June 2025 | September 2025 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18948334 | METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DISPLAYING PRIVACY INDICATIONS FOR NAVIGATION TABS | November 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 11 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18345879 | CONTENT GENERATION FOR GENERATIVE LANGUAGE MODELS IN MESSAGING APPLICATIONS | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18255604 | INTERACTION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEDIA OBJECT IN MEDIA LIBRARY, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18252537 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM FOR SLIDE TO EXECUTE TOUCH BUTTON | May 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17920535 | AUTHORING TOOL FOR CREATING INTERACTIVE MEDIA STORYLINE | October 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17916228 | MULTI-TASK MANAGEMENT METHOD AND TERMINAL DEVICE | September 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17953328 | SYNCHRONIZING MESSAGE STATUS ACROSS MULTIPLE USER DEVICES | September 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17939459 | INTERFACE FOR SETTING SPEED AND DIRECTION OF VIDEO PLAYBACK | September 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17768890 | PROVISION OF FEEDBACK TO AN ACTUATING OBJECT | April 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17703147 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENABLING VOICE AND VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS USING A MESSAGING APPLICATION | March 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17589927 | GESTURE-BASED USER INTERFACE | February 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17588200 | Data Analysis Platform with Animation for Rendering Graphical Representations of Data | January 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17648713 | Browser-Based Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Robot Design Interface | January 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17648717 | Systems and Methods for Executing Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Within a Web Browser | January 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17647988 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROVISION SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD FOR INCLUDING DISPLAY SCREEN IMAGE WITH STATUS EVENT NOTIFICATION | January 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17565181 | TECHNOLOGY ADD-ON INTERFACE | December 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17534731 | METHOD, AN APPARATUS, AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND A STORAGE MEDIUM FOR SHARING MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA | November 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17493924 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CUSTOMIZING MEDIA PLAYER PLAYBACK SPEED | October 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17490701 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AGGREGATE GROUP PRESENCE STATE IDENTIFIER | September 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 41 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17484553 | MODIFYING A FILE STORAGE STRUCTURE UTILIZING A MULTI-SECTION GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE | September 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17310847 | SYSTEMS AND INTERFACES FOR LOCATION-BASED DEVICE CONTROL | August 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 50 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17375991 | System and Method for Ignoring Call with Quick Reply Using a Messaging Application | July 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17364553 | DEFINING AND DEBUGGING MODULE COMPLETENESS GRAPHS BASED ON INTERACTIVE USER INTERFACE CHECKLIST ELEMENTS | June 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 48 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17149929 | PLAYLISTS PROGRESS BAR IN AN INTERACTIVE MEDIA GUIDANCE APPLICATION | January 2021 | December 2025 | Abandon | 59 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17127375 | SHARING OF COLLABORATIVE DOCUMENTS WITH USERS VIA INSTANT MESSAGING | December 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17119551 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR TRANSITION BETWEEN TWO APPLICATIONS | December 2020 | September 2025 | Allow | 58 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17079928 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USING ACTIVITY-BACKED OVERLAYS TO DISPLAY MEDIA CONTENT ON PORTABLE DEVICES DURING PERIODS OF USER INACTIVITY | October 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17031854 | PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND WORKOUT MONITOR WITH DAILY ACTIVITY INDICATORS | September 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 51 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17031671 | USER INTERFACES WITH A CHARACTER HAVING A VISUAL STATE BASED ON DEVICE ACTIVITY STATE AND AN INDICATION OF TIME | September 2020 | January 2025 | Allow | 52 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16902971 | SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR CUBIC GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES | June 2020 | September 2025 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16892555 | Interacting Method for Sidebar Menu with Shortcut Icons, Apparatus and Computer-readable Storage Medium | June 2020 | January 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16835909 | ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECE AND NOTIFICATION CONTROL METHOD | March 2020 | January 2025 | Abandon | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15486285 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ORGANIZING MESSAGES | April 2017 | November 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15421865 | CONTEXT-SPECIFIC USER INTERFACES FOR RELOCATING ONE OR MORE COMPLICATIONS IN A WATCH OR CLOCK INTERFACE | February 2017 | April 2024 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13288267 | GRANTING OBJECT AUTHORITY VIA A MULTI-TOUCH SCREEN TO A COLLABORATOR | November 2011 | June 2016 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12874868 | DYNAMICALLY DEPICTING INTERACTIONS IN A VIRTUAL WORLD BASED ON VARIED USER RIGHTS | September 2010 | March 2016 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12238744 | METHODS, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS, AND HARDWARE PRODUCTS FOR PROVIDING INTERACTIVE PROGRAM GUIDE AND INSTANT MESSAGING CONVERGENCE | September 2008 | December 2013 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PAN, PHOEBE X.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner PAN, PHOEBE X works in Art Unit 2179 and has examined 22 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 72.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 53 months.
Examiner PAN, PHOEBE X's allowance rate of 72.7% places them in the 36% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by PAN, PHOEBE X receive 4.77 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PAN, PHOEBE X is 53 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +16.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PAN, PHOEBE X. This interview benefit is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 12.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 40.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.