USPTO Examiner MRABI HASSAN - Art Unit 2147

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19216504Artificially Intelligent Systems, Methods and Media for Canonicalizing Computer System Logs Into Natural Language Processed Representations for the Purpose of Data AnalysisMay 2025November 2025Allow610YesNo
19054879Systems and methods for processing designsFebruary 2025September 2025Allow710NoNo
19054882Systems and methods for processing designsFebruary 2025September 2025Allow700NoNo
19054800Computer-Implemented Methods and Systems for Generative Text PaintingFebruary 2025June 2025Allow410YesNo
19021755METHOD FOR PROCESSING COMPLEX DATAJanuary 2025March 2025Allow200NoNo
18987388Graphical User Interface for Syntax and Policy Compliance ReviewDecember 2024June 2025Allow510NoNo
18680337Systems and Methods for Guided Natural Language Text GenerationMay 2024December 2024Allow700YesNo
18648075METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR CONTENT PRESENTATIONApril 2024December 2024Allow800YesNo
18627021Presenting Search Results in a Dynamically Formatted Graphical User InterfaceApril 2024March 2025Allow1100YesNo
18437104CONTENT-BASED TACTILE OUTPUTSFebruary 2024October 2024Allow900NoNo
18415746DISPLAY SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A RECREATIONAL VEHICLEJanuary 2024January 2026Allow2420YesNo
18414899SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING PERSONALIZED CONTENTJanuary 2024October 2024Allow900YesNo
18410621LANGUAGE MODEL FOR ABSTRACTIVE SUMMARIZATIONJanuary 2024August 2025Allow1910YesNo
18408263SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONVERSION OF DOCUMENTS TO REUSABLE CONTENT TYPESJanuary 2024October 2024Allow900YesNo
18390846System and Method for Electronic Document Interaction with External ResourcesDecember 2023October 2024Allow900YesNo
18544159CREATION OF COMPONENT TEMPLATES BASED ON SEMANTICALLY SIMILAR CONTENTDecember 2023August 2024Allow800YesNo
18370717MACHINE LEARNING BASED INSTANTIATION OF DOCUMENTS BASED ON TEMPLATES IN A DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMSeptember 2023September 2025Allow2410NoNo
18239868TECHNIQUES FOR VIEW CAPTURE AND STORAGE FOR MOBILE APPLICATIONSAugust 2023July 2024Allow1100YesNo
18456370SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTENT CREATION BASED ON AUDIENCE PREFERENCE AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORSAugust 2023January 2025Allow1710NoNo
18449467SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PROCESSING ELECTRONIC FORMSAugust 2023September 2025Allow2530YesNo
18336417Augmented Natural Language Generation PlatformJune 2023May 2024Allow1100YesNo
18334862SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOCUMENT TRANSLATION IN A FORMAT AGNOSTIC DOCUMENT VIEWERJune 2023August 2024Allow1410NoNo
18313987DRILL DOWN OF STATISTICS CHART ROWMay 2023October 2024Allow1710YesNo
18313529UTILIZING A TRANSFORMER-BASED GENERATIVE LANGUAGE MODEL TO GENERATE DIGITAL DESIGN DOCUMENT VARIATIONSMay 2023December 2024Allow1910YesNo
18161485Transforming Content Across Visual Mediums Using Artificial Intelligence and User Generated MediaJanuary 2023November 2025Allow3400NoNo
18101793CONTENT MANAGEMENT TOOLSJanuary 2023September 2025Abandon3210YesNo
17967218LEARNING DATA GENERATION DEVICE, METHOD, AND RECORD MEDIUM FOR STORING PROGRAMOctober 2022February 2026Allow4010YesNo
17934221GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT TRAINING JOB ALLOCATIONSeptember 2022September 2025Allow3600NoNo
17929290SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADAPTING PLATFORM BEHAVIOR USING MACHINE-LEARNING-BASED REMOTE ENTITY LIFECYCLE MONITORINGSeptember 2022February 2026Allow4100NoNo
17900753COMPUTING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING A DATA SCIENCE MODEL HAVING REDUCED BIASAugust 2022June 2025Allow3400YesNo
17870942DOMAIN-DRIVEN FEEDBACK DATA ANALYSIS IN INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMJuly 2022June 2025Allow3500NoNo
17759036CORRELATION AND POLICY ENGINE POLICY CREATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATIONJuly 2022October 2024Allow2700NoNo
17858680MESSAGING ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMJuly 2022January 2026Allow4210YesNo
17846784CUSTOMIZED AGREEMENT VALIDATIONJune 2022May 2025Abandon3420YesNo
17831464STORAGE MEDIUM, DATABASE CONSTRUCTION METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSJune 2022May 2025Allow3500NoNo
17710880INTENT-BASED TASK REPRESENTATION LEARNING USING WEAK SUPERVISIONMarch 2022May 2025Allow3800NoNo
17709237APPARATUS, ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE, AND METHODS FOR CLUSTERED FEDERATED LEARNING USING CONTEXT DATAMarch 2022March 2026Abandon4820YesNo
17655669PROBABILISTIC ENTITY-CENTRIC KNOWLEDGE GRAPH COMPLETIONMarch 2022October 2025Allow4310YesNo
17652779MACHINE LEARNING MODEL EVALUATION SYSTEM AND METHODFebruary 2022September 2025Abandon4310NoNo
17652863Machine Learning Super Large-Scale Time-series ForecastingFebruary 2022October 2025Allow4310YesNo
17652754QUERY-DRIVEN CHALLENGE OF AI BIASFebruary 2022October 2025Allow4310YesNo
17666477SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE DOCUMENT MANAGEMENTFebruary 2022November 2024Abandon3320NoNo
17665742Method and System for Rule Mining Using Quantum ComputingFebruary 2022June 2025Allow4100NoNo
17589699PHYLOGENETIC REPLAY LEARNING IN DEEP NEURAL NETWORKSJanuary 2022August 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17577620INTELLIGENT ORDER PROBLEM LEARNING AND MITIGATION IN AUTOMATED ORDER PROCESSING SYSTEMJanuary 2022August 2025Allow4310YesNo
17564275RESONATOR NETWORK BASED NEURAL NETWORKDecember 2021October 2025Allow4610YesNo
17553063Statistical dependence-aware biological predictive systemDecember 2021January 2026Allow4910YesNo
17619395SPIKING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK BASED ON FLASH STORAGE AND COMPUTING ARRAYDecember 2021October 2025Allow4620YesNo
17546346PRIORITIZED DATA CLEANINGDecember 2021September 2025Allow4510YesNo
17545921Quantum Computer Designs with Core Computing and Cache Regions that Utilize Lattice SurgeryDecember 2021March 2025Allow3900NoNo
17528362PREDICTING TARGETED FUTURE ENGAGEMENT USING TRAINED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROCESSESNovember 2021January 2026Allow5020YesNo
17509102INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAMOctober 2021November 2024Allow3700NoNo
17450055DISTRIBUTED SYNCHRONOUS TRAINING ARCHITECTURE USING STALE WEIGHTSOctober 2021June 2025Allow4410NoNo
17470951METHOD FOR REAL-TIME ENHANCEMENT OF A PREDICTIVE ALGORITHM BY A NOVEL MEASUREMENT OF CONCEPT DRIFT USING ALGORITHMICALLY-GENERATED FEATURESSeptember 2021June 2025Allow4510NoNo
17399584EVOLUTION OF TOPICS IN A MESSAGING SYSTEMAugust 2021February 2026Allow5420NoNo
17355310METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRAINING CLASSIFICATION TASK MODEL, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJune 2021December 2025Allow5410YesNo
17330048IMPLEMENTATION-TUNED ARCHITECTURE FOR NEURAL NETWORK PROCESSING IN A LEARNED TRANSFORM DOMAINMay 2021December 2024Allow4300NoNo
17322194REDUCING OPERATIONS FOR TRAINING NEURAL NETWORKSMay 2021May 2025Allow4810YesNo
17318022DATA DE-IDENTIFICATION USING SEMANTIC EQUIVALENCE FOR MACHINE LEARNINGMay 2021April 2025Allow4710YesNo
17237892MACHINE-LEARNING TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO INTERACTION DATA FOR DETERMINING SEQUENTIAL CONTENT AND FACILITATING INTERACTIONS IN ONLINE ENVIRONMENTSApril 2021February 2025Allow4620YesNo
17237827TECHNIQUE FOR ASSESSING TRUST BASED ON COMPANY EMAIL DOMAIN DATAApril 2021February 2025Allow4620NoNo
17217903SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EMAIL CAMPAIGN DOMAIN CLASSIFICATIONMarch 2021January 2025Allow4510YesNo
17280252TEACHING DATA EXTENDING DEVICE, TEACHING DATA EXTENDING METHOD, AND PROGRAMMarch 2021October 2024Allow4310NoNo
17190992PREDICTION OF FUTURE OCCURRENCES OF EVENTS USING ADAPTIVELY TRAINED ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE PROCESSES AND CONTEXTUAL DATAMarch 2021February 2025Allow4820YesNo
17254372DATA PROCESSING METHOD, DEVICE, COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2020September 2025Allow5630YesYes
17111120AUGMENTING A PRESENTATION BASED ON A PREDICTED USER KNOWLEDGE BACKGROUNDDecember 2020August 2025Abandon5640YesNo
17099310Methods and Circuits for Copying Qubits and Quantum Representation of Images and SignalsNovember 2020October 2025Abandon5920NoYes
17098822STATISTICAL CONFIDENCE METRIC FOR RECONSTRUCTIVE ANOMALY DETECTION MODELSNovember 2020November 2023Allow3630YesYes
17090481ANALOG NEURAL MEMORY ARRAY IN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK WITH SOURCE LINE PULLDOWN MECHANISMNovember 2020March 2024Allow4120NoNo
17036913TASK PRIORITIZED EXPERIENCE REPLAY ALGORITHM FOR REINFORCEMENT LEARNINGSeptember 2020December 2024Allow5040YesNo
15494685AUGMENTING WEB CONTENT TO IMPROVE USER EXPERIENCEApril 2017April 2019Allow2320YesNo
15340666SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRESENTING OPTIMIZED MAP LABELSNovember 2016February 2019Allow2710NoNo
15164425METHOD AND SYSTEM TO CONVERT DOCUMENT SOURCE DATA TO XML VIA ANNOTATIONMay 2016August 2018Allow2720YesNo
15163537MOBILE TERMINALMay 2016September 2018Allow2810YesNo
14993385AUTHORING TOOL FOR THE AUTHORING OF WRAP PACKAGES OF CARDSJanuary 2016July 2016Allow610YesNo
14852138WRAP DESCRIPTOR FOR DEFINING A WRAP PACKAGE OF CARDS INCLUDING A GLOBAL COMPONENTSeptember 2015July 2016Allow1010YesNo
14643745METHOD FOR LOGICAL ORGANIZATION OF WORKSHEETSMarch 2015July 2016Allow1610YesNo
14546284TECHNIQUES FOR SYNCHRONIZATION OF A PRINT MENU AND DOCUMENT ANNOTATION RENDERINGS BETWEEN A COMPUTING DEVICE AND A MOBILE DEVICE LOGGED IN TO THE SAME ACCOUNTNovember 2014January 2017Allow2630YesNo
14452940System and Method for Rendering an Assessment ItemAugust 2014April 2017Allow3220NoNo
14448205SYNCHRONISING SCREENSHOTS IN DOCUMENTATION WITH PRODUCT FUNCTIONALITYJuly 2014June 2017Allow3510NoNo
14332416Methods, Circuits, Devices, Systems and Associated Computer Executable Code for Composing Composite ContentJuly 2014November 2016Allow2810YesNo
14263292METHOD FOR LOGICAL ORGANIZATION OF WORKSHEETSApril 2014July 2016Allow2610YesNo
14047872ANNOTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC CONTENTOctober 2013May 2016Allow3110YesNo
14036308STRUCTURAL HOT SPOT AND CRITICAL LOCATION MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2013December 2018Allow6060YesNo
13817689Optimizing Hyper Parameters of Probabilistic Model for Mixed Text-and-Graphics Layout TemplateFebruary 2013September 2015Allow3110YesNo
13733014ONLINE DOCUMENTATION REVIEWJanuary 2013March 2017Allow5130YesNo
13670428USING MOTION GESTURES TO SEND, SAVE, DELETE, AND REJECT A MESSAGENovember 2012February 2015Allow2810YesNo
13609541Personalized medical recordSeptember 2012July 2017Allow5830NoNo
13535193CONVERTING DIGITAL PUBLICATIONS INTO A FORMAT FOR SENDING TO A USER DEVICEJune 2012April 2017Allow5850YesNo
13535164MASKING CONTENT WHILE PRESERVING LAYOUT OF A WEBPAGEJune 2012June 2016Allow4830YesNo
13517802OVERRIDING STYLE RULES FOR STYLING WEB ELEMENTSJune 2012November 2016Allow5340YesNo
13468543INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS HAVING PAGE PREVIEW FUNCTION, METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2012March 2016Allow4640YesNo
13462740TRANSLATING USER INTERFACE SOUNDS INTO 3D AUDIO SPACEMay 2012March 2019Allow6040YesYes
13428498INTERACTION BASED PRIORITIZED RETRIEVAL OF EMBEDDED RESOURCESMarch 2012February 2019Allow6060YesYes
13217557Arranging Content in an Electronic PageAugust 2011July 2015Allow4630YesNo
13072475MOBILE TERMINAL FOR DISPLAYING A WEBPAGE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAMEMarch 2011November 2016Allow6050YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MRABI, HASSAN.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
3
Examiner Affirmed
1
(33.3%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(66.7%)
Reversal Percentile
86.0%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 66.7% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
5
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(40.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(60.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
65.4%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 40.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner MRABI, HASSAN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MRABI, HASSAN works in Art Unit 2147 and has examined 51 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.1%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 46 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MRABI, HASSAN's allowance rate of 96.1% places them in the 86% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MRABI, HASSAN receive 2.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 55% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MRABI, HASSAN is 46 months. This places the examiner in the 11% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +4.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MRABI, HASSAN. This interview benefit is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 18.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 57.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.