Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17138597 | BATTERY BOX | December 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17101525 | CONFORMAL GRAPHENE CAGE ENCAPSULATED BATTERY ELECTRODE MATERIALS AND METHODS OF FORMING THEREOF | November 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17056765 | COMPOSITE PARTICLES, METHOD FOR PRODUCING COMPOSITE PARTICLES, LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY ELECTRODE, AND LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY | November 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17056662 | THERMOSETTING ELECTROLYTE COMPOSITION FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, GEL POLYMER ELECTROLYTE PREPARED THEREFROM, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE ELECTROLYTE | November 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 35 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17052246 | Vehicle With a High-Voltage Battery | November 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 35 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17050258 | BATTERY MODULE, AND BATTERY RACK AND ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME | October 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17060237 | BATTERY MODULE | October 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17034189 | Battery Module | September 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17040328 | ENERGY STORAGE APPARATUS | September 2020 | April 2023 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17025551 | HEAT RESISTANT FIBER LAYER FOR BATTERY INSULATION | September 2020 | November 2023 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16981711 | BATTERY PACK CASE AND BATTERY PACK | September 2020 | January 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17008946 | COMBUSTION-POWERED FASTENER DRIVING TOOL FUEL CELL ADAPTER | September 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16977161 | BATTERY PACK EXHAUST DUCT AND BATTERY PACK | September 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16955371 | HOUSING FOR RECEIVING BATTERY CELLS, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME | August 2020 | November 2024 | Abandon | 53 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 16967350 | BATTERY PACK CASE AND BATTERY PACK | August 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16965479 | BATTERY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD | July 2020 | November 2024 | Abandon | 51 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16929433 | BATTERY HOUSING, BATTERY AND MOTOR VEHICLE | July 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 53 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16928265 | BATTERY ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING THE SAME | July 2020 | May 2023 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16923742 | SYSTEM FOR SUPPLYING POWER TO A PORTABLE BATTERY USING AT LEAST ONE SOLAR PANEL | July 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16920047 | LITHIUM ION CELLS WITH SILICON BASED ACTIVE MATERIALS AND NEGATIVE ELECTRODES WITH WATER-BASED BINDERS HAVING GOOD ADHESION AND COHESION | July 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16770122 | BATTERY PACK | June 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16759007 | BATTERY PACK COMPRISING BATTERY PACK FRAME CAPABLE OF PREVENTING WELDING DEFECT AND PRESSING JIG FOR PREPARING THE SAME | April 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16844668 | STRUCTURAL BATTERY WITH PRESSURE HOUSING FOR PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES | April 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16838005 | ACCUMULATOR | April 2020 | May 2023 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16704663 | BATTERY MODULE HOUSING SYSTEM WITH INTEGRATED COOLING MEANS | December 2019 | September 2023 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16695920 | SECONDARY BATTERY POSITIVE ELECTRODE, AND SECONDARY BATTERY | November 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16694222 | ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE OF MEMBRANE-ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY INCLUDING ELECTRONIC INSULATION LAYER AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF | November 2019 | February 2024 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16677828 | BATTERY STRUCTURE WITH ENERGY ABSORPTION MEMBERS | November 2019 | March 2025 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 1 | No | Yes |
| 16658442 | BATTERY CELL WITH ELECTROLYTE DIFFUSION MATERIAL | October 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16568312 | ACCUMULATOR BATTERY PACK, COMPRISING MAGNETIC SHUNTS THAT CAN BE ACTUATED ON DEMAND FOR THE ELECTRICAL SWITCHING OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ACCUMULATORS | September 2019 | November 2023 | Allow | 50 | 1 | 2 | Yes | No |
| 16568963 | BATTERY COOLING ASSEMBLY | September 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16567528 | BUS BAR MODULE AND BATTERY PACK | September 2019 | May 2023 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16561830 | SECONDARY BATTERY | September 2019 | February 2025 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16490576 | BINDER COMPOSITION FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY POSITIVE ELECTRODE, COMPOSITION FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY POSITIVE ELECTRODE, POSITIVE ELECTRODE FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY, AND NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY | September 2019 | May 2023 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16540363 | BATTERY MODULE | August 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16540359 | BATTERY PACK | August 2019 | April 2023 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16525817 | ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND SECONDARY BATTERY | July 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16523477 | BATTERY INCLUDING MULTIPLE UNIT CELLS HAVING DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS IN ELECTRONIC CONDUCTIVITY OF ANODE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING SAME | July 2019 | May 2023 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16447923 | SMART-BATTERY-PROTECTION PLATE, SMART BATTERY, AND MOBILE PLATFORM | June 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16349426 | ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME | May 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 49 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16407731 | ALKALI METAL-SULFUR SECONDARY BATTERY CONTAINING CONDUCTING POLYMER NETWORK-PROTECTED CATHODE MATERIAL PARTICULATES | May 2019 | October 2023 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16347624 | SHEET-TYPE AIR CELL, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND PATCH | May 2019 | February 2023 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16236829 | BATTERY, BATTERY PACK, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, ELECTROMOTIVE VEHICLE, POWER STORAGE DEVICE, AND ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM | December 2018 | December 2023 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16016729 | SPLIT PANEL ARRAY PLATE ASSEMBLIES FOR ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE BATTERY PACKS | June 2018 | May 2023 | Allow | 59 | 2 | 1 | No | Yes |
| 16012920 | LEAD ACID BATTERY SEPARATORS, BATTERIES, AND RELATED METHODS | June 2018 | April 2023 | Allow | 58 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16063230 | A COMPOSITE ANODE ACTIVE MATERIAL, METHOD OF PREPARING THE COMPOSITE ANODE MATERIAL, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING THE COMPOSITE ANODE ACTIVE MATERIAL | June 2018 | February 2023 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15703114 | BATTERY LIQUID QUENCH SYSTEM AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF | September 2017 | January 2023 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12835470 | SECONDARY BATTERY | July 2010 | March 2013 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12695803 | MODULAR CID ASSEMBLY FOR A LITHIUM ION BATTERY | January 2010 | October 2013 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner AKHTAR, KIRAN QURAISHI.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner AKHTAR, KIRAN QURAISHI works in Art Unit 1751 and has examined 49 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.8%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner AKHTAR, KIRAN QURAISHI's allowance rate of 87.8% places them in the 68% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by AKHTAR, KIRAN QURAISHI receive 2.53 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AKHTAR, KIRAN QURAISHI is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +15.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AKHTAR, KIRAN QURAISHI. This interview benefit is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 20.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 6% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 6% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.