USPTO Examiner GROSS CHRISTOPHER M - Art Unit 1684

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18800910MACROMOLECULE ANALYSIS EMPLOYING NUCLEIC ACID ENCODINGAugust 2024December 2024Allow410NoNo
18764943N-TERMINAL MODIFIER AGENTS AND BINDERS FOR TREATING AND ANALYZING PEPTIDESJuly 2024July 2025Allow1221YesNo
18764600EFFICIENTLY CHARACTERIZING PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONSJuly 2024October 2024Allow300YesNo
18659334MACROMOLECULE ANALYSIS EMPLOYING NUCLEIC ACID ENCODINGMay 2024March 2025Allow1000NoNo
18660053MACROMOLECULE ANALYSIS EMPLOYING NUCLEIC ACID ENCODINGMay 2024June 2025Allow1400NoNo
18610717METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS USING ONE-SIDED TRANSPOSITIONMarch 2024March 2025Allow1210NoNo
18590738ARRAYS INCLUDING A RESIN FILM AND A PATTERNED POLYMER LAYERFebruary 2024April 2025Allow1410NoNo
18409174METHODS, COMPOSITIONS, AND SYSTEMS FOR SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ANALYTES IN A BIOLOGICAL SAMPLEJanuary 2024May 2025Allow1610YesNo
18492069MAMMALIAN CELLS AND METHODS FOR ENGINEERING THE SAMEOctober 2023November 2024Allow1312YesNo
18355946SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS OF TRANSPOSASE ACCESSIBLE CHROMATINJuly 2023April 2025Allow2120NoNo
18329296MAMMALIAN CELL LINE FOR PROTEIN PRODUCTION AND LIBRARY GENERATIONJune 2023November 2024Allow1710YesNo
18190288NANOPORE DEVICE AND METHODS OF BIOSYNTHESIS USING SAMEMarch 2023January 2024Allow1000NoNo
18178367METHODS, COMPOSITIONS, AND SYSTEMS FOR CAPTURING PROBES AND/OR BARCODESMarch 2023December 2024Allow2240NoNo
18099913PROBE SET FOR ANALYZING A DNA SAMPLE AND METHOD FOR USING THE SAMEJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2930YesNo
18055297Fusion Proteins Comprising an Engineered Knottin Peptide and Uses ThereofNovember 2022December 2024Allow2620YesNo
18050912FLEXIBLE SUBSTRATES FOR NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESISOctober 2022February 2025Abandon2830YesNo
17899860High-Throughput Screening Methods to Identify Small Molecule TargetsAugust 2022May 2024Allow2110NoNo
17816691METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MASK ALIGNMENT IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS OF ARRAYSAugust 2022June 2025Abandon3501NoNo
17690386METHOD FOR SYNTHESIZING DNAMarch 2022November 2024Abandon3211NoNo
17683059GENE SEQUENCING CHIP AND GENE SEQUENCING METHODFebruary 2022April 2025Allow3710NoNo
17624295BIOMARKERS FOR IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROMEDecember 2021May 2025Allow4000NoNo
17447416MODULAR CHEMIRESISTIVE SENSOR FOR REAL-TIME ETHYLENE MONITORINGSeptember 2021April 2025Allow4300NoNo
17431193METHODS FOR DETERMINING KINETIC PARAMETERS OF A REACTION BETWEEN ANALYTE AND LIGANDSAugust 2021June 2025Allow4601YesNo
17175606METHODS AND DEVICES FOR DETECTION AND ACQUISITION OF BIOMARKERSFebruary 2021January 2025Abandon4810NoNo
17258001METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ANALYZING PLATELETS BY MASS CYTOMETRYJanuary 2021November 2024Abandon4610NoNo
17141682Methods, Systems and Compositions Thereof for Nucleic Acid Library Quality Control and QuantificationJanuary 2021May 2025Abandon5241NoNo
17055803Devices, Systems, and Methods of Electronic Modulation of Polymerase for DNA SynthesisNovember 2020August 2024Allow4531YesNo
17082940METHODS OF SINGLE-POLYPEPTIDE SEQUENCING AND RECONSTRUCTIONOctober 2020November 2024Abandon4821NoNo
17079959COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THERAPEUTICS PRESCREENINGOctober 2020March 2025Allow5350YesNo
16968512ARRAY-BASED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARIESAugust 2020November 2024Abandon5260NoNo
16943067STABILIZED IMMUNOGLOBULIN DOMAINSJuly 2020November 2024Allow5211NoNo
16548143IN VITRO DNA WRITING FOR INFORMATION STORAGEAugust 2019November 2024Abandon6041YesNo
16385735MOVABLE TYPE METHOD APPLIED TO PROTEIN-LIGAND BINDINGApril 2019September 2024Allow6010YesNo
16302345METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLESNovember 2018January 2025Allow6080YesNo
16074128NUCLEIC ACIDS ENCODING CHIMERIC POLYPEPTIDES FOR LIBRARY SCREENINGJuly 2018April 2025Allow6061YesNo
15212215METHODS OF SELECTING ANTIBODIES AND ANTIBODY FRAGMENTSJuly 2016May 2025Allow6060YesYes
15131101APPARATUS FOR ASSAY, SYNTHESIS AND STORAGE, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE, USE, AND MANIPULATION THEREOFApril 2016January 2018Allow2120YesNo
14993792PHAGE MICROARRAY PROFILING OF THE HUMORAL RESPONSE TO DISEASEJanuary 2016April 2018Allow2701YesNo
14823571MANIPULATION OF MICROPARTICLES IN MICROFLUIDIC SYSTEMSAugust 2015January 2017Allow1810YesNo
14414916MULTI-SENSOR ARRAY COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFJanuary 2015January 2018Allow3611YesNo
14073653PS-SPCL SEARCHING APPARATUS AND METHOD USING SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCENovember 2013April 2018Allow5321NoNo
13761968TYROSINE KINASE BIOSENSORS AND METHODS OF USEFebruary 2013August 2016Allow4331NoNo
13487605PROBE ARRAY BASE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PROBE ARRAY BASE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PROBE ARRAYJune 2012January 2014Allow1921YesNo
13463212BETA-AMINO ACIDSMay 2012February 2014Allow2111YesNo
13396352Methods and Compositions for the Target-localized Anchoring of Detectable LabelFebruary 2012June 2016Allow5241YesNo
13365554METHODS AND KITS USING EXTENDED RHODAMINE DYESFebruary 2012August 2013Allow1922YesNo
13289542Ligand Libraries for Screening GPCRsNovember 2011January 2013Abandon1411NoNo
13207486IDENTIFYING ANTIGEN CLUSTERS FOR MONITORING A GLOBAL STATE OF AN IMMUNE SYSTEMAugust 2011December 2013Allow2811YesNo
12928312High throughput system for isolation, growth, and detection of lipid inclusions in bacteriaDecember 2010August 2015Allow5621YesNo
12848888Stamping Apparatus For Biochips and Method For Operation ThereofAugust 2010May 2015Allow5821YesNo
12465719NOVEL DIARYLPHOSPHINE-CONTAINING COMPOUNDS, PROCESSES OF PREPARING SAME AND USES THEREOF AS TRIDENTATE LIGANDSMay 2009March 2013Allow4621YesNo
12162799Novel Silane Compounds and Their Use in Functionalizing Solid Supports and Immobilizing Biological Molecules on These SupportsAugust 2008July 2016Allow6061NoNo
11884066Method and Array for the Replication and Analysis of Nucleic AcidsJune 2008September 2015Allow6042YesNo
12133190MASSIVELY PARALLEL SYNTHESIS OF BIOPOLYMERIC ARRAYSJune 2008July 2016Allow6031NoNo
11908223QUANTUM DOT TEMPLATE FOR FAST AND SIMULTANEOUS DETECTION OF DIFFERENT INFECTIOUS AGENTSMay 2008December 2013Allow6032YesNo
11856099METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR DETECTING PROTEIN-PROTEIN AND PROTEIN-NUCLEIC ACID INTERACTIONSSeptember 2007September 2013Allow6021YesNo
10594182POLYMER PARTICLEJuly 2007December 2010Allow5111YesNo
11758735METHOD FOR DETECTING TARGET BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL USING DNA BARCODESJune 2007November 2010Allow4111YesNo
11744112NUCLEIC ACID SAMPLE PURIFICATION AND ENRICHMENT WITH A THERMO-AFFINITY MICROFLUIDIC SUB-CIRCUITMay 2007March 2011Allow4622YesNo
11404807METHOD FOR SCREENING ANTI-ADHERENT COMPOUNDS ON POLYMERS FOR PREVENTING BIOFILM FORMATIONApril 2006June 2009Allow3831YesNo
10563463CUCURBITURIL DERIVATIVE-BONDED SOLID SUBSTRATE AND BIOCHIP USING THE SAMEJanuary 2006July 2010Allow5431NoNo
10894916SOLUTION AND SOLID PHASE SYNTHESIS OF PYRROLINONES AND POLYPYRROLINONESJuly 2004March 2010Allow6050YesNo
10889914PREPARATION AND USES FOR POLYARYLATESJuly 2004May 2009Allow5831YesYes
10877380SEPARATION OF COMPOUNDS USING TAGGING MOIETIES INCLUDING VARYING NUMBERS OF REPEAT UNITSJune 2004April 2010Allow6031YesNo
10838911FACILITATED FORWARD CHEMICAL GENETICS USING TAGGED TRIAZINE LIBRARYMay 2004February 2010Allow6061YesNo
10779421HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING METHODS FOR LUBRICATING OIL COMPOSITIONSFebruary 2004February 2011Allow6041YesYes
10470296END GROUP ACTIVATED POLYMERS WITH OLIGONUCLEOTIDE LIGANDSJuly 2003August 2009Allow6051YesNo
10466124PERFLUORO SULFONYL HALIDES AND RELATED SPECIES AS POLYMER SUPPORT MODIFIERSJuly 2003November 2009Allow6031YesYes
10612298PEPTIDES COMPRISING AROMATIC D-AMINO ACIDS AND METHODS OF USEJuly 2003November 2009Allow6061YesNo
10455986MULTI-CHANNEL ANALYTE-SEPARATION DEVICE EMPLOYING SIDE-ENTRY EXCITATIONJune 2003January 2008Allow5631YesNo
10417543METHODS FOR MEASURING ENZYME ACTIVITYApril 2003December 2009Allow6041YesYes
10389501DURABLE FILM COATING COMPOSITIONS HAVING SUSTAINED SLOW-RELEASE CAPABILITY, AND METHODS OF USE THEREFORMarch 2003January 2008Abandon59100YesYes
10253493INSULIN AND IGF-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS AND ANTAGONISTSSeptember 2002January 2006Allow4001YesNo
10197115LATEX BASED ADSORBENT CHIPJuly 2002January 2009Allow6042YesYes
10192026SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE IMAGING OF MICRO-ARRAYSJuly 2002November 2009Allow6082YesNo
10186783SYNTHESIS AND USE OF ORGANOSILICA PARTICLESJuly 2002September 2004Abandon2761YesYes
10128493GLYCOSYL-ETOPOSIDE PRODRUGS, A PROCESS FOR PREPARATION THEREOF AND THE USE THEREOF IN COMBINATION WITH FUNCTIONALIZED TUMOR-SPECIFIC ENZYME CONJUGATESApril 2002July 2005Allow3911NoNo
09908518LATEX BASED ADSORBENT CHIPJuly 2001November 2008Allow6072YesNo
09763607METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING AND/OR ANALYZING BIOCHEMICAL REACTION SUPPORTING MATERIALSApril 2001January 2010Allow6052YesNo
09764163CIRCULARLY PERMUTATED, INTERACTION-ACTIVATED PROTEINSJanuary 2001January 2009Allow6071YesYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
3
Examiner Affirmed
1
(33.3%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(66.7%)
Reversal Percentile
85.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 66.7% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
11
Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(36.4%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(63.6%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
56.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 36.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M works in Art Unit 1684 and has examined 72 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 83.3%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M's allowance rate of 83.3% places them in the 51% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M receive 2.93 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +28.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M. This interview benefit is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 16.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 59% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 55.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 70.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 27.8% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 3% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.