Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18667301 | REGULATION OF ROOT DEVELOPMENT | May 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18651582 | USE OF MfERF026 GENE REGULATION IN GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT, AND STRESS TOLERANCE OF MEDICAGO SATIVA | April 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18400143 | NOVEL TOMATO YELLOW LEAF CURL VIRUS ISOLATE AND INFECTIOUS CLONES THEREOF | December 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 17 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18570977 | PLANTS RESISTANT TO INFECTION BY PEPINO MOSAIC VIRUS | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18277560 | USE OF SWEETPOTATO IBSAP15 GENE IN REGULATING LEAF SHAPE AND FLOWER SHAPE OF SWEETPOTATO | August 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18344933 | PLANT-BASED SYNTHESIS PRODUCTS | June 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18268856 | PROMOTING REGENERATION AND TRANSFORMATION IN PLANTS | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18331970 | RICE WHITE LEAF AND PANICLE GENE WLP3 AND APPLICATION THEREOF IN RICE STRESS RESISTANCE AND YIELD INCREASE | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18255916 | TOMATO PLANTS RESISTANT TO TOBRFV, TMV, TOMV AND TOMMV AND CORRESPONDING RESISTANCE GENES | June 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18066191 | METHODS TO BLOCK APHID TRANSMISSION OF POLEROVIRUSES AND TO DEVELOP VIRUS MANAGEMENT TOOLS | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18049645 | SEC12-LIKE PROTEIN GENE CPU1 AND APPLICATION THEREOF IN IMPROVING SOYBEAN PHOSPHORUS EFFICIENCY | October 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17904510 | PRIME EDITING TECHNOLOGY FOR PLANT GENOME ENGINEERING | August 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17416015 | NATIVE DELIVERY OF BIOMOLECULES INTO PLANT CELLS USING IONIC COMPLEXES WITH CELL-PENETRATING PEPTIDES | June 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner CHATTERJEE, JAYANTA works in Art Unit 1662 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 53 months.
Examiner CHATTERJEE, JAYANTA's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by CHATTERJEE, JAYANTA receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CHATTERJEE, JAYANTA is 53 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 133.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.