USPTO Examiner BREEN KIMBERLY CATHERINE - Art Unit 1657

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18596683PEPTIDE BIOMARKER FOR IDENTIFYING HIPPOCAMPUS SPECIES BASED ON PEPTIDOMICS AND APPLICATION THEREOFMarch 2024April 2025Abandon1320NoNo
18402122BIOPLASTIC PRODUCTION METHODJanuary 2024April 2025Abandon1510NoNo
18373435Caproate-producing bacterium with multiple substrate utilization capabilities and its applicationsSeptember 2023July 2024Allow1011YesNo
18461008FUSION PROTEINS, RECOMBINANT BACTERIA, AND EXOSPORIUM FRAGMENTS FOR PEST CONTROL AND PLANT HEALTHSeptember 2023September 2025Allow2511YesNo
18350668COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURONAL INJURIESJuly 2023December 2025Abandon3020NoNo
18012660METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COLONY PICKINGDecember 2022December 2025Abandon3610NoNo
18009395PHYSIOLOGICALLY ACCEPTABLE COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING MICROORGANISMS OR MICROBIAL PRODUCTSDecember 2022November 2025Abandon3511NoNo
17998345AN ANTIBODY FRAGMENT BASED ANTIMICROBIAL CONJUGATE SELECTIVELY TARGETING PSEUDOMONASNovember 2022December 2025Abandon3710NoNo
17907449MICROBIOME-BASED THERAPEUTICSSeptember 2022March 2026Abandon4220NoNo
17814459PROBIOTIC STRAIN FOR REDUCING SERUM URIC ACID, COMPOSITION AND USE THEREOFJuly 2022January 2025Abandon3021NoNo
17844835OPTOGENETIC CONTROL OF MICROBIAL CO-CULTURE POPULATIONSJune 2022September 2024Abandon2721NoNo
17748727REAGENT KIT CONTAINING POLYPEPTIDE FOR USE IN DETECTION OF INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONSMay 2022December 2025Allow4351YesNo
17661169BIOPLASTIC PRODUCTION METHODApril 2022August 2025Abandon4051YesNo
17770740MICROBIOTA BASED THERAPIES TO PROMOTE MENTAL HEALTHApril 2022March 2026Abandon4721NoNo
17717211Method for Preparing Bacterial Cellulose Membrane Using Enzymatic Soybean HydrolysateApril 2022July 2025Abandon3920NoNo
17696374Uricase Derivative Co-conjugated With Fatty acid-linked PEG and optionally, Alkoxy PEGMarch 2022May 2024Abandon2621NoNo
17678441METHOD FOR MICROALGAL CULTIVATIONFebruary 2022August 2024Abandon3030NoNo
17666345PHOTOSYNTHETIC PROTEIN SECRETION PLATFORMFebruary 2022August 2024Allow3021YesNo
17560060PREOPERATIVE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF PREPARATION THEREOFDecember 2021May 2025Allow4041YesNo
17551057COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATING ASTHMADecember 2021March 2025Abandon3931NoNo
17530649COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATED TO GROWING AND/OR PRODUCING BACTERIAL STRAINS USING AGRICULTURAL BYPRODUCTSNovember 2021March 2025Abandon3941NoNo
17524568SPECIMEN COLLECTION FOR MICROBIAL BURDEN CLASSIFICATION AND SPECIMEN TRANSPORTATION TO LAB FOR REPORTING DIRECT-FROM-SPECIMEN ID AND ASTNovember 2021November 2023Abandon2401NoNo
17606177USES OF PANTOTHENIC ACID IN PREPARATION OF A COMPOSITION FOR TREATING AND/OR PREVENTING TUMORSOctober 2021March 2023Abandon1710NoNo
17508562MEDIUM FOR PRIMARY ISOLATION OF PORPHYROMONAS GINGIVALIS, AND A MEDIUM FOR PREPARING THE MEDIUM AND USE THEREOFOctober 2021May 2024Abandon3121NoNo
17436070FERRITIN NANOCAGE FOR MULTI-DISPLAYING TRAIL TRIMER AND CANCER-TARGETING PEPTIDE AND USE THEREOF AS ANTICANCER AGENTSeptember 2021February 2026Allow5341NoNo
17419082Polypeptide Having Phospholipase C Activity and Use ThereofJune 2021November 2024Allow4111YesNo
17358945Novel MethodsJune 2021February 2026Abandon5641NoYes
17413179A METHOD FOR INCREASING ROMIDEPSIN PRODUCTION FROM FERMENTATION BROTHJune 2021January 2026Allow5651YesNo
17331613PREOPERATIVE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF PREPARATION THEREOFMay 2021November 2023Abandon3021NoNo
17324067ONE-STEP FORMULATION FOR ALL-IN-ONE HYDROLYSIS SOLUTIONMay 2021August 2024Abandon3921NoNo
17292266BIOSYNTHESIS OF MOGROSIDESMay 2021October 2024Allow4111YesNo
17291058PROCESSES FOR TREATMENT OF MICROBE SUSPENSIONSMay 2021June 2024Abandon3811NoNo
17244385COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING ARGINASE 1 FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEUROVASCULAR AND RETINAL VASCULAR DISORDERSApril 2021September 2023Abandon2911NoNo
17238641SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF ENZYMESApril 2021December 2024Abandon4431NoYes
17283299MUTANT STRAIN OF TRICHODERMA REESEI, AND PROTEIN MANUFACTURING METHODApril 2021December 2024Abandon4410NoNo
17210956METHOD FOR MEASURING A BLOOD COAGULATION ACTIVITYMarch 2021October 2025Abandon5450YesNo
17278662STRAIN FOR PREVENTING AND TREATING METABOLIC DISEASES AND USE THEREOFMarch 2021March 2024Allow3620YesNo
17209318SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BIOMASS CARBON REMOVAL AND STORAGEMarch 2021May 2023Abandon2530NoNo
17276222PRODUCTION METHOD FOR IMMOBILIZED MICROORGANISMS AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR AMINO ACID USING THE SAMEMarch 2021June 2024Abandon3921YesNo
17276075A COMPOSITION OF PHOTOAUTOTROPHIC MICROORGANISMS AND CHEMOHETEROTROPHIC MICROORGANISMS IN A BIOFILMMarch 2021January 2025Allow4631YesNo
17273580NOVEL TREATMENT FOR MUCOSITISMarch 2021February 2024Abandon3610NoNo
17273635PROBIOTIC COMBINATION FOR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY-RELATED GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERSMarch 2021August 2025Abandon5461NoYes
17187499COMPOSITION CONTAINING A VITAL PROBIOTIC CULTURE FOR HUMAN OR VETERINARY USE AS A DEODORANTFebruary 2021January 2025Abandon4750NoNo
17267877BEHAVIOURAL TREATMENTFebruary 2021March 2025Abandon4931NoNo
17172860COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING PROBIOTICS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFFebruary 2021August 2023Abandon3041NoNo
17168328METHOD OF IDENTIFYING PROPERTIES OF MICROORGANISMS USING ODEP FORCEFebruary 2021April 2023Abandon2610NoNo
17265829Directed Evolution of a Mutualistic Community of Organisms for the Production of a Nutrient or a NutraceuticalFebruary 2021January 2025Abandon4740NoNo
17151871BIOSYNTHESIS AND RECOVERY OF SECONDARY METABOLITESJanuary 2021January 2025Abandon4821NoNo
17147709METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR RESECTION MARGIN LAVAGEJanuary 2021April 2023Abandon2701NoNo
17144868INTESTINAL MICROBE HAVING D-PSICOSE-RESPONSIVE PROLIFERATIONJanuary 2021March 2023Abandon2710NoNo
17258195USE OF LEUCONOSTOC MESENTEROIDES SUBSP. MESENTEROIDES SD23 FOR MATERNAL FETAL METABOLIC PROGRAMMINGJanuary 2021April 2023Abandon2701NoNo
17257156MICROCAPSULE OF SUSTAINABLE SELF-HEALING COAL MINE VENTILATION SEALING MATERIAL CRACK AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOFDecember 2020December 2024Abandon4711NoNo
17256599SEPARATING AGENTDecember 2020June 2024Allow4220YesNo
17130118USE OF GRAM-NEGATIVE LYSIN-ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE (AMP) POLYPEPTIDE CONSTRUCTS IN TREATING ENDOCARDITISDecember 2020May 2024Abandon4131NoNo
17126346Microbial Conductive Ceramics and Preparation Method and Application thereofDecember 2020March 2024Abandon3911NoNo
17121685WOUND CLOSURE ENHANCEMENT METHODS AND MATERIALS VIA MANIPULATION OR AUGMENTATION OF LIPIN-1December 2020January 2024Abandon3711NoNo
17117099ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE POLYPEPTIDES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFDecember 2020June 2025Allow5461YesNo
16972492COMPOSITION FOR DIAGNOSING DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH COX2 OVEREXPRESSION AND SCREENING METHOD THEREFORDecember 2020March 2025Allow5131YesNo
15734900COMPOSITION FOR THE TREATMENT OF ATOPIC DERMATITIS COMPRISING BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS SUBSP. LACTIS LM1017December 2020March 2023Allow2720YesNo
17100005CRYPTIC ANTIBIOTICS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING BIOACTIVE CRYPTIC METABOLITESNovember 2020June 2025Allow5551YesNo
17057609METHOD FOR PREPARING PRECURSOR OF RECOMBINANT HUMAN INSULIN OR ANALOGUE THEREOFNovember 2020April 2024Abandon4101NoNo
17078883COMPOSITIONS FOR ACTIVE IMMUNOTHERAPYOctober 2020June 2025Abandon5631NoNo
17038229AUTOMATED BIONANOCATALYST PRODUCTIONSeptember 2020October 2025Abandon6031NoNo
17036526AUTOTRANSPORTER-MEDIATED DISPLAY OF COMPLEMENT RECEPTOR LIGANDS BY BACTERIAL IMMUNOGENSSeptember 2020January 2023Allow2811YesNo
17006334SALT FORMULATIONS FOR THE FERMENTATION OF MARINE MICROORGANISMSAugust 2020June 2025Abandon5841YesNo
16937051SCREENING METHOD, DEVICE AND KIT FOR DETECTING MUCOSAL CARBOHYDRATES AND ASSOCIATED CONDITIONSJuly 2020December 2024Abandon5340NoNo
16863603RAPID METHODS FOR DETERMINING MICROORGANISM GROWTH IN SAMPLES OF HUMAN ORIGINApril 2020August 2023Abandon3901NoNo
16779327Targetable 3`-Overhang Nuclease Fusion ProteinsJanuary 2020December 2025Abandon6061YesNo
16632966METHOD FOR RAPID DETECTION AND ENUMERATION OF VIRUSES, BACTERIOPHAGE AND/OR BACTERIAJanuary 2020July 2023Abandon4211NoNo
16672152METHODS FOR DIAGNOSING, MONITORING AND MITIGATING MICROBIOLOGICALLY INFLUENCED CORROSIONNovember 2019April 2023Abandon4110NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
0.9%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
0.9%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE works in Art Unit 1657 and has examined 52 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 25.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE's allowance rate of 25.0% places them in the 3% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE receive 2.46 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 20% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +72.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE. This interview benefit is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 9.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 20.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 90.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.