USPTO Examiner MORGAN BAILEY MICHELLE - Art Unit 1645

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19227585PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING SUTTERELLA WADSWORTHENSIS AND IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS FOR TREATMENT OF COLON CANCERJune 2025January 2026Allow710NoNo
18624353ANTI-STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS SPECIFIC ANTIBODY AND NUCLEIC ACID ENCODING SEQUENCE THEREOF, AND USES OF THE SAMEApril 2024March 2025Allow1211NoNo
18416083LACTOBACILLUS PARACASEI GLU70 STRAIN WITH GLUTEN-DEGRADING ABILITY AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY AND PROBIOTIC PROPERTIES AND USES THEREOFJanuary 2024March 2025Abandon1310NoNo
18503901LYOPHILIZED AND STABILIZED LIVE ATTENUATED FORMULATED VACCINE AGAINST TULAREMIANovember 2023March 2025Allow1620YesNo
18354838METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVING IMMUNE SYSTEM FUNCTIONJuly 2023December 2025Abandon2911NoNo
18249626BACTERIA BASED PROTEIN DELIVERYApril 2023September 2025Allow2800YesNo
18147627IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC VACCINE AND ANTIBODY COMBINATION THERAPYDecember 2022September 2025Allow3321YesNo
17910263PROTECTIVE STAPHYLOCOCCAL EXOTOXIN VACCINESeptember 2022December 2025Abandon4001NoNo
17793813RECOMBINANT BCG, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND APPLICATION THEREOFJuly 2022February 2026Allow4311NoNo
17790103LASSO PEPTIDES FOR TREATMENT OF CANCERJune 2022October 2025Abandon3901NoNo
17789300ANTICANCER COMPOSITION COMPRISING TLR5 AGONIST DERIVED FROM FLAGELLIN AS ACTIVE INGREDIENTJune 2022January 2026Abandon4320NoNo
17788137SAMPLE PREPARATION AND MICROBIAL ANALYSISJune 2022September 2025Abandon3910NoNo
17786129LIVE ATTENUATED LEISHMANIA PARASITE VACCINES WITH ENHANCED SAFETY CHARACTERISTICSJune 2022February 2026Allow4421YesNo
17783379M. TUBERCULOSIS AG85 PROTEINS AND METHODS OF USEJune 2022September 2025Abandon3911NoNo
17782873TOOLS AND METHODS TO DETECT AND ISOLATE COLIBACTIN PRODUCING BACTERIAJune 2022September 2025Abandon3911NoNo
17781930Bacterial strain Bacillus mojavensis PS17 for producing higher yield and protection of agricultural plants against phytopathogenic fungiJune 2022November 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17773494IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH COMBINATION THERAPY COMPRISING AN IMMUNOTOXINApril 2022August 2025Allow4020NoNo
17771175TREATMENT AND CONTROL OF BACTERIAL AND FUNGAL DISEASE IN HONEYBEESApril 2022October 2025Abandon4211NoNo
17766551METHOD FOR TREATING AND/OR PREVENTING A PARASITIC INFECTION IN A TELEOSTApril 2022February 2026Allow4620NoNo
17765428NON-TOXIC LISTERIOLYSIN O POLYPEPTIDES AND USES THEREOFMarch 2022March 2025Abandon3601NoNo
17438515Epitope-Based Approach for Allergy Treatments and Inhibitors for Crohn's DiseaseSeptember 2021September 2025Allow4811NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner MORGAN, BAILEY MICHELLE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MORGAN, BAILEY MICHELLE works in Art Unit 1645 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MORGAN, BAILEY MICHELLE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MORGAN, BAILEY MICHELLE receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MORGAN, BAILEY MICHELLE is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 200.0% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.